Search found 9058 matches
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:00 pm
- Forum: Classical Theravāda
- Topic: Identity View
- Replies: 41
- Views: 5059
Re: Identity View
From SN 5.10: "Why now do you assume 'a being'? Mara, have you grasped a view? This is a heap of sheer constructions: Here no being is found. Just as, with an assemblage of parts, The word 'chariot' is used, So, when the aggregates are present, There's the convention 'a being.'" https://ww...
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:39 pm
- Forum: Classical Theravāda
- Topic: Identity View
- Replies: 41
- Views: 5059
Re: Identity View
The senses are all there is (Sabba Sutta) and the senses are empty of self (Sunna Sutta).Suddh wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:30 pmRead them many times. They're clear, yes. Your point is not.Spiny Norman wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:21 pm Read the Sabba Sutta, then the Sunna Sutta.
It's pretty clear.
Again, is this not clear to you?
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:34 pm
- Forum: Classical Theravāda
- Topic: Identity View
- Replies: 41
- Views: 5059
Re: Identity View
The Buddha is quite clear that if Vacchagotta hadn’t been liable to such confusion, he would have said there is no self. A true self is an impossible thing. Indeed, and it's very clear. It's puzzles me that some don't (won't?) understand this. Do explain it for our benefit if you can. Is the follow...
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:21 pm
- Forum: Classical Theravāda
- Topic: Identity View
- Replies: 41
- Views: 5059
Re: Identity View
Read the Sabba Sutta, then the Sunna Sutta.
It's pretty clear.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
It's pretty clear.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:09 pm
- Forum: Early Buddhism
- Topic: What is a dhammā exactly?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 1049
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:07 pm
- Forum: Classical Theravāda
- Topic: Identity View
- Replies: 41
- Views: 5059
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:24 pm
- Forum: Early Buddhism
- Topic: What is a dhammā exactly?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 1049
Re: What is a dhammā exactly?
Anything we fabricate If they are qualities then that isn’t quite true. Also nibbana is said to be a dhamma. Conditioned qualities are fabricated. And nibbana is beyond fabrication by definition. We have to distinguish between conditioned and unconditioned dhammas. "Anything we experience"...
- Mon Mar 25, 2024 3:20 pm
- Forum: Early Buddhism
- Topic: What is a dhammā exactly?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 1049
Re: What is a dhammā exactly?
Anything we experience?
- Sat Mar 23, 2024 7:54 pm
- Forum: General Theravāda discussion
- Topic: "If we owned our body, it would obey our every command"
- Replies: 41
- Views: 773
Re: "If we owned our body, it would obey our every command"
Hello, I keep running into this statement in Ajahn Chah's teachings. I don't understand the logic. To me this sounds like a logical fallacy, because it doesn't matter what kind of thing you own, it just does not follow that said thing will 'obey your commands', especially if it's not even a being o...
- Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:29 pm
- Forum: Connections to Other Paths
- Topic: Buddha appear lagging behind Jesus & Mohammed
- Replies: 75
- Views: 4038
Re: Buddha appear lagging behind Jesus & Mohammed
I sometimes wonder whether the focus on suffering puts people off.
- Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:51 pm
- Forum: General Theravāda discussion
- Topic: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
- Replies: 760
- Views: 19390
Re: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
No.cappuccino wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:18 pmEternalism means you do not change
(You are the same person you always were)
Annihilationism means you won’t exist
(Period)
- Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:46 pm
- Forum: General Theravāda discussion
- Topic: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
- Replies: 760
- Views: 19390
Re: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
So you agree that nothing is annihilated because there are no things that inherently exist in the first place? No that’s annihilationism Trying to sneak past I think you're missing the point. In the suttas both eternalism and annihiliationism are based on the assumption of a self. Eternalism is the...
- Mon Mar 04, 2024 6:40 pm
- Forum: General Theravāda discussion
- Topic: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
- Replies: 760
- Views: 19390
Re: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
It's not a "way of thinking", it's what the suttas say.cappuccino wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:27 pmI know this way of thinkingSpiny Norman wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:52 pm When the parts are assembled
we use the word ‘chariot’.
It’s not the full picture
Anyway, what is the full picture in your view?
- Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:52 pm
- Forum: General Theravāda discussion
- Topic: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
- Replies: 760
- Views: 19390
Re: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
Have you read SN 5.10? A nun? She thinks that way “Why do you believe there’s such a thing as a ‘sentient being’? Māra, is this your theory? This is just a pile of conditions, you won’t find a sentient being here. When the parts are assembled we use the word ‘chariot’. So too, when the aggregates a...
- Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:06 pm
- Forum: General Theravāda discussion
- Topic: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
- Replies: 760
- Views: 19390
Re: The great cappucciNO SELF debate
Why "no"? Have you read SN 5.10?cappuccino wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:57 pmNo…Spiny Norman wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:01 pmBecause there is nothing to be annihilated. See SN 5.10.