Forbidden Woman

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Post Reply
pelletboy
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 12:58 pm

Forbidden Woman

Post by pelletboy »

Are women engaged to be married part of the list of Forbidden Women you can't have sex with? I read in one list that one "earmarked since birth" is a forbidden women? Does this count if she was engaged later in life yet not yet married? In another list it doesn't state an engaged woman as forbidden but it was replaced with a woman "kept by her husband." Which is which?
User avatar
kirk5a
Posts: 1959
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:51 pm

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by kirk5a »

pelletboy wrote:Are women engaged to be married part of the list of Forbidden Women you can't have sex with? I read in one list that one "earmarked since birth" is a forbidden women? Does this count if she was engaged later in life yet not yet married? In another list it doesn't state an engaged woman as forbidden but it was replaced with a woman "kept by her husband." Which is which?
Sex with an engaged woman or man is against the 3rd precept. If you think about it, you can see the suffering that results there. How would you feel if your fiance had sex with someone else?
"When one thing is practiced & pursued, ignorance is abandoned, clear knowing arises, the conceit 'I am' is abandoned, latent tendencies are uprooted, fetters are abandoned. Which one thing? Mindfulness immersed in the body." -AN 1.230
User avatar
robertk
Posts: 5633
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by robertk »

Even a prostitute that has been paid for by another man is off limits- you are taking his temporary lover- what more to say of stealing someone's bethrothed.
pelletboy
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 12:58 pm

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by pelletboy »

robertk wrote:Even a prostitute that has been paid for by another man is off limits- you are taking his temporary lover- what more to say of stealing someone's bethrothed.
Still, a prostitute is said to be a "temporary wife" and why is there a difference between being married and engaged if there is no difference in allowable "space?" I also encountered a story in the Jatakas urging a king to overlook one of his subjects having sex with a girl in his harem. Isn't a woman in a king's harem forbidden as sex partners as well?
User avatar
Fede
Posts: 1182
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: The Heart of this "Green & Pleasant Land"...
Contact:

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by Fede »

Ok, pelletboy, cut the crood... who is she?
Have you met someone?
Is she 'off-limits' in some way?
What concerns do you have about pursuing this?

I suspect many questions regarding the Moral fabric of the Precepts posed in a general way, hide a more specific motivation.
But hey! :shrug:

I could be waaaaay off bat here.

And if I am, I apologise.....
"Samsara: The human condition's heartbreaking inability to sustain contentment." Elizabeth Gilbert, 'Eat, Pray, Love'.

Simplify: 17 into 1 WILL go: Mindfulness!

Quieta movere magna merces videbatur. (Sallust, c.86-c.35 BC)
Translation: Just to stir things up seemed a good reward in itself. ;)

I am sooooo happy - How on earth could I be otherwise?! :D


http://www.armchairadvice.co.uk/relationships/forum/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
pelletboy
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 12:58 pm

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by pelletboy »

kirk5a wrote:
pelletboy wrote:Are women engaged to be married part of the list of Forbidden Women you can't have sex with? I read in one list that one "earmarked since birth" is a forbidden women? Does this count if she was engaged later in life yet not yet married? In another list it doesn't state an engaged woman as forbidden but it was replaced with a woman "kept by her husband." Which is which?
Sex with an engaged woman or man is against the 3rd precept. If you think about it, you can see the suffering that results there. How would you feel if your fiance had sex with someone else?
If the amount of suffering is what's being talked about here, boyfriends or girlfriends who cheat on each other by having sex with other partners would be breaking the 3rd precept but they aren't.
santa100
Posts: 6852
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:55 pm

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by santa100 »

Pelletboy wrote:
If the amount of suffering is what's being talked about here, boyfriends or girlfriends who cheat on each other by having sex with other partners would be breaking the 3rd precept but they aren't.
Notice that suffering is not just limited to "hurting someone's feeling". There're plenty of suffering for those boyfriends or girlfriends: the uncontrollable increase in lust and delusion, the spread of sexual transmitted diseases, wasting of wealth to accomodate multiple partners, wasting of precious time on heedless activities, etc..
pelletboy
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 12:58 pm

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by pelletboy »

Yo0u just can't discount that sex is a major part of the joys of the 6 sense heavens and the human realm. Its one of the main good points in the dhamma that reveals to people that many forms of premarital sex are not sin unlike Christianity which suffocates this aspect of life that would give many people such benefits in their emotional demeanor. Of course its a revelation that can benefit or destroy us depending on how mature we are. But still its the truth.
User avatar
Tex
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:46 pm
Location: Austin, TX, USA

Re: Forbidden Woman

Post by Tex »

pelletboy wrote:Yo0u just can't discount that sex is a major part of the joys of the 6 sense heavens and the human realm.
Sex is a sensual pleasure, which means that no matter how much we enjoy it, it is inherently dangerous to beings prone to clinging and craving. It should be approached with caution and as much skill as we can manage (until we're ready to eventually let it go altogether).
pelletboy wrote:If the amount of suffering is what's being talked about here, boyfriends or girlfriends who cheat on each other by having sex with other partners would be breaking the 3rd precept but they aren't.
I think some would argue that they are indeed breaking the third precept. Cheating on a partner that you've committed to certainly falls under my personal definition of "sexual misconduct".

Consider this elaboration on the third precept (emphasis added):
And how is one made pure in three ways by bodily action? There is the case where a certain person, abandoning the taking of life, abstains from the taking of life. He dwells with his rod laid down, his knife laid down, scrupulous, merciful, compassionate for the welfare of all living beings. Abandoning the taking of what is not given, he abstains from taking what is not given. He does not take, in the manner of a thief, things in a village or a wilderness that belong to others and have not been given by them. Abandoning sensual misconduct, he abstains from sensual misconduct. He does not get sexually involved with those who are protected by their mothers, their fathers, their brothers, their sisters, their relatives, or their Dhamma; those with husbands, those who entail punishments, or even those crowned with flowers by another man. This is how one is made pure in three ways by bodily action.
Above from: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'm not entirely sure what "crowned with flowers by another man" means; perhaps that was their customary equivalent of an engagement ring or a promise ring or simply a way of advertising that "this woman and I are together". Regardless, I take the third precept very broadly: I won't touch a woman who has a boyfriend, much less a fiance, and I won't cheat on any woman that I'm committed to, whether the topic of marriage ever comes up or not.

Cliff's Notes: You know sleeping with someone else's fiancee is not okay.
"To reach beyond fear and danger we must sharpen and widen our vision. We have to pierce through the deceptions that lull us into a comfortable complacency, to take a straight look down into the depths of our existence, without turning away uneasily or running after distractions." -- Bhikkhu Bodhi

"No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man." -- Heraclitus
Post Reply