vipaka of dana to bad people

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Post Reply
Lombardi4
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by Lombardi4 »

Generosity towards worthy people is good karma, isn't it?

Is generosity towards unworthy people bad karma?

If someone gives money to, let's say, a madman, does the giver accumulate negative karma from this act?
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27839
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Stefan,
Stefan wrote:Is generosity towards unworthy people bad karma?
Not unless you're giving it to them with the intention of them doing something unwholesome with it (e.g. funding an assassination attempt, giving drugs to someone so they can mess themselves up)

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Lombardi4
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

Re: vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by Lombardi4 »

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Stefan,
Stefan wrote:Is generosity towards unworthy people bad karma?
Not unless you're giving it to them with the intention of them doing something unwholesome with it (e.g. funding an assassination attempt, giving drugs to someone so they can mess themselves up)

Metta,
Retro. :)
I got it. Thanks.
Individual
Posts: 1970
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:19 am

Re: vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by Individual »

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Stefan,
Stefan wrote:Is generosity towards unworthy people bad karma?
Not unless you're giving it to them with the intention of them doing something unwholesome with it (e.g. funding an assassination attempt, giving drugs to someone so they can mess themselves up)

Metta,
Retro. :)
Willful ignorance, even subtle, is itself an intention. Naivety has consequences too, not merely pre-meditated acts of aggression.
The best things in life aren't things.

The Diamond Sutra
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27839
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Individual,

It's worth bearing in mind though that the Buddha did not discourage people from making offering to wanderers of other sects, even though their ascetics and practitioners were to certain extents ignorant.

Kamma is intention and it's not transcendent, so it's to be expected that there will be some degree of imperfection associated with any volitional act.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
thornbush
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by thornbush »

It's worth bearing in mind though that the Buddha did not discourage people from making offering to wanderers of other sects, even though their ascetics and practitioners were to certain extents ignorant.
And it seems that 'charity begins at home' is the message forwarded here....
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Endowed with these five qualities, a lay follower is a jewel of a lay follower, a lotus of a lay follower, a fine flower of a lay follower. Which five? He/she...
does not search for recipients of his/her offerings outside [of the Sangha], and gives offerings here first..."
User avatar
cooran
Posts: 8503
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by cooran »

Hello all,

dhammapal posted this as a response on E-sangha:
Should One Honour Shameless and Immoral Monks?
http://www.aimwell.org/Books/Ledi/Dhamm ... onour.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Individual
Posts: 1970
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:19 am

Re: vipaka of dana to bad people

Post by Individual »

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Individual,

It's worth bearing in mind though that the Buddha did not discourage people from making offering to wanderers of other sects, even though their ascetics and practitioners were to certain extents ignorant.
Ignorant, yes, but not necessarily malicious. I don't think the Buddha would've supported giving offerings to malicious people. As I understand it, the early Buddhists were ambivalent or supportive of the Jains, but hostile (that might be the wrong word to use) towards the Ajivikans and Carvakans; they didn't view all outside sects as equal. A religious sect or teacher can have ignorant views, but still be the basis for moral conduct, whereas other religious sects may be the basis for immoral conduct -- one could use extreme examples like suicide cults or the Islamic groups engaged in terrorism. If a person funds a Muslim group which funds terrorism, out of their own ignorance, they partially bear the consequence for the act. Teachers and groups which fall in between these extremes, those which are simply exploitative liars, like Madame Blavatsky and L. Ron Hubbard, are a grey area.
retrofuturist wrote: Kamma is intention and it's not transcendent, so it's to be expected that there will be some degree of imperfection associated with any volitional act.
But some forms of imperfection are more imperfect than others.
The best things in life aren't things.

The Diamond Sutra
Post Reply