Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism

Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Bankei » Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:29 am

Hi

Ancient and Modern Theravadins claim merit can be transferred to others. If this is the case why is it that demerit cannot be transferred?

What is the logic behind transference of merit? It is a noble aspiration but doesn't make sense to me.

Thank

Bankei
-----------------------
Bankei
Bankei
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Individual » Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:41 am

Bankei wrote:Ancient and Modern Theravadins claim merit can be transferred to others.

This is a practice among Mahayana Buddhists and it is predominant among Theravadins in Buddhist countries, but it is not a teaching of the Buddha or early Theravada commentators. Apparently (I found a source through Google) which claims that it is explicitly rejected in the Kathavatthu, but despite this, it is strangely mentioned in a text of a later date, the Buddhapadana. It seems like Theravada Buddhism over time was influenced somewhat by trends in Mahayana practices. I think Ven. Dhammanando would be able to say more in detail on this and give you a better answer.

The Dhammapada seems pretty explicit about rejecting the idea of transferring merit (Dhp 165):
Evil is done by oneself,
by oneself is one defiled.

Evil is left undone by oneself,
by oneself is one cleansed.

Purity & impurity are one's own doing.
No one purifies another. No other purifies one.

The mere idea of even considering "transferring" merit seems to miss what merit is, conflating it with a common superstition.

As Accesstoinsight.org's glossary says:
puñña [pu~n~na]: Merit; worth; the inner sense of well-being that comes from having acted rightly or well and that enables one to continue acting well.

This is distinguished from the common Asian Buddhist misunderstanding of kamma as some kind of mystical "stuff" you carry with you, like a kind of external or paranormal energy or substance that can be stored or transferred. But kamma is simply action, and this action is cetana, that is, intent, and punna is simply the inner sense of well-being that comes from wholesome action.
The best things in life aren't things.

The Diamond Sutra
Individual
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:19 am

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby mikenz66 » Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:19 am

There is some discussion of sharing merit here:
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1068

The Theravada position is not that the merit gets "given away", it is that we give the opportunity for others (devas, deceased relatives in the hungry ghost realm, etc...) to rejoice in our meritorious deeds.

See the other thread for more details and Sutta references.

Metta
Mike
User avatar
mikenz66
 
Posts: 10383
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby gavesako » Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:07 am

During the recent political trouble in Thailand, some of the parties have performed "Buddhist" ceremonies directed at an (imagined) protective deity of Siam, asking him to "smite their opponents with terrible misfortune" so that they cannot exert their power anymore (i.e. Thaksin and his people). This may sound like voodoo or perhaps transfer of demerit...

:spy:
Bhikkhu Gavesako
Kiṃkusalagavesī anuttaraṃ santivarapadaṃ pariyesamāno... (MN 26)

ajahnchah.org - Teachings of Ajahn Chah in many languages
Dhammatube - Videos on Buddhist practice
Ancient Buddhist Texts - Translations and history of Pali texts
User avatar
gavesako
 
Posts: 1400
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:16 pm
Location: England

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby cooran » Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:29 am

As has been stated here and in the other thread, Merit is not 'transferred' - it is shared.

Merit and Spiritual Growth ~ Bhikkhu Bodhi
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... html#merit

metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
cooran
 
Posts: 7605
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby tiltbillings » Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:45 am

gavesako wrote:During the recent political trouble in Thailand, some of the parties have performed "Buddhist" ceremonies directed at an (imagined) protective deity of Siam, asking him to "smite their opponents with terrible misfortune" so that they cannot exert their power anymore (i.e. Thaksin and his people). This may sound like voodoo or perhaps transfer of demerit...

:spy:


Or it sounds like what theists sometimes do. The War Prayer by Mark Twain is worth a read:


http://www.ntua.gr/lurk/making/warprayer.html
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.

Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireas na daoine.
People live in one another’s shelter.

"We eat cold eels and think distant thoughts." -- Jack Johnson
User avatar
tiltbillings
 
Posts: 19559
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Dmytro » Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:49 am

Hello,

The followers of Mahadeva, founder of Caitika school of Buddhism, originated the theory of gifts (deyyadhamma), which stated that the merits gained by the donation can be transferred to anyone. Later this theory evolved in the Mahayana theory of 'transfer of merit' (parinamana).

In Mahayana, Bodhisattva is seen as one who transfers his merits to other believers, and takes their bad karma on himself. This is exemplified by Tibetan breathing meditation practice, whereas with every outbreath one imagines that he is sharing merits with others, and imagines that with every inbreath takes in others' demerits.

The 'parinamana' theory infiltrated into the Theravadin rituals , especially in Sri lanka.

See: http://books.google.com.ua/books?id=PO0lZ-TFssMC

Metta, Dmytro
User avatar
Dmytro
 
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:24 pm
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Bhikkhu Pesala » Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:15 am

AIM WebsitePāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
 
Posts: 2033
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Bankei » Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:24 am

Thank you for all or your replies.

Sharing of merit sounds better than transferring of merit.

But if merit can be shared, then surely demerit can be too?

What do you think?

Bankei
-----------------------
Bankei
Bankei
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby retrofuturist » Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:27 am

Greetings Bankei,

An example of sharing demerits would be beating someone up, and then going to your mates to brag about it and get enthusiastic about the fact you'd hurt someone. You've created unwholesome mindstates for yourself and you're prompting and encouraging them in others.

Metta,
Retro. :)
If you have asked me of the origination of unease, then I shall explain it to you in accordance with my understanding:
Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)


Exalted in mind, just open and clearly aware, the recluse trained in the ways of the sages:
One who is such, calmed and ever mindful, He has no sorrows! -- Udana IV, 7


Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum) -- Open flower ~ Open book (blog)
User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14674
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Bhikkhu Pesala » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:25 am

Smile and the world smiles with you, cry and you cry alone. :)
AIM WebsitePāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
 
Posts: 2033
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby retrofuturist » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:34 am

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Smile and the world smiles with you... :)


I'll smile to that bhante... thanks for sharing merit!

Metta,
Retro. :)
If you have asked me of the origination of unease, then I shall explain it to you in accordance with my understanding:
Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)


Exalted in mind, just open and clearly aware, the recluse trained in the ways of the sages:
One who is such, calmed and ever mindful, He has no sorrows! -- Udana IV, 7


Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum) -- Open flower ~ Open book (blog)
User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14674
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby tiltbillings » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:12 am

cry and you cry alone.


Excerpt for those who want to drag you down into the same who they are in. Misery Loves Company.
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.

Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireas na daoine.
People live in one another’s shelter.

"We eat cold eels and think distant thoughts." -- Jack Johnson
User avatar
tiltbillings
 
Posts: 19559
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Will » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:47 pm

Dmytro wrote:Hello,

The followers of Mahadeva, founder of Caitika school of Buddhism, originated the theory of gifts (deyyadhamma), which stated that the merits gained by the donation can be transferred to anyone. Later this theory evolved in the Mahayana theory of 'transfer of merit' (parinamana).

In Mahayana, Bodhisattva is seen as one who transfers his merits to other believers, and takes their bad karma on himself. This is exemplified by Tibetan breathing meditation practice, whereas with every outbreath one imagines that he is sharing merits with others, and imagines that with every inbreath takes in others' demerits.

The 'parinamana' theory infiltrated into the Theravadin rituals , especially in Sri lanka.

See: http://books.google.com.ua/books?id=PO0lZ-TFssMC

Metta, Dmytro


A little clarification on the Tong-len (giving & taking) practice of the Tibetans. They make clear that there is no actual absorption of evil or transference of good to others. This practice is only for uplifting our mind and making it more selfless. When one is very far advanced on the Path, then an actual healing or blessing from a distance, is possible.
This noble eightfold path is the ancient path traveled by all the Buddhas of eons past. Nagara Sutta
User avatar
Will
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:26 pm

Re: Transfer of Merit - why not demerit

Postby Shonin » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:14 pm

It seems to me that others have the potential to inherit the consequences of my good and bad actions at all times - which is why I act with care. I'm not talking about mysterious ceremonies, but the natural laws of cause and effect.
Shonin
 
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:11 am


Return to General Theravāda discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dhammapal, retrofuturist and 8 guests