Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism

Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby fivebells » Sun Jun 23, 2013 11:59 pm

According to Wikipedia, once-returners are characterized by attenuation of sensuality and ill-will. It's not specific on what the level of attenuation is.

Is it that a once-returner has recognized that sensuality and ill-will are the central problems which can be addressed by the malleability of mind afforded by stream-entry, and has committed to eradicating them, at which point they are non-returners? Much like a stream-entrant has rejected self-view but still experiences becoming and birth, and becomes an arahant when that is eradicated?
fivebells
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:52 am

Re: Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby cooran » Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:36 am

Please read these three pages - it will help to clarify:

Qualities of Ariya Persons
http://www.thisismyanmar.com/nibbana/ariyas4.htm

Ariyas Noble Persons
http://www.thisismyanmar.com/nibbana/mtinmon4.htm

From Puttajhana to Buddha
http://www.thisismyanmar.com/nibbana/ariyacht.htm

With metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
cooran
 
Posts: 7052
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby retrofuturist » Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:41 am

Greetings,

fivebells wrote:According to Wikipedia, once-returners are characterized by attenuation of sensuality and ill-will. It's not specific on what the level of attenuation is.

Apologies that the specifics are lost to my mind, but I believe a scholar (Gombrich, perhaps?) suggested that these two are differentiated in order to correlate to (and thus contrast with) a prevailing four-stage Vedic framework.

Metta,
Retro. :)
If you have asked me of the origination of unease, then I shall explain it to you in accordance with my understanding:
Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)


Exalted in mind, just open and clearly aware, the recluse trained in the ways of the sages:
One who is such, calmed and ever mindful, He has no sorrows! -- Udana IV, 7


Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum) -- Open flower ~ Open book (blog)
User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14520
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby fivebells » Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:09 am

retrofuturist: Thanks, that's an interesting idea.
fivebells
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:52 am

Re: Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby lyndon taylor » Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:40 am

I don't think you'll know for sure if you're a non returner till you don't return, It seems to me these criteria are rough estimations not intended to be taken literally all the time.
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community that has so generously given me so much, sincerely former monk John
User avatar
lyndon taylor
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Location: Redlands, Southern California, USA

Re: Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby IanAnd » Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:12 am

lyndon taylor wrote:I don't think you'll know for sure if you're a non returner till you don't return, It seems to me these criteria are rough estimations not intended to be taken literally all the time.

Yes, the second comment is true of many things espoused by those of a persuasion.

With regard to the former comment, the process of returning is caused by a moment of desire for re-existence. If that desire has been cooled (or extinguished) it is likely one will KNOW this beforehand. Hence, non-returner. If one is a non-returner, he generally KNOWS such beforehand.
"The gift of truth exceeds all other gifts" — Dhammapada, v. 354 Craving XXIV
User avatar
IanAnd
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:19 am
Location: the deserts of Arizona

Re: Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby Aloka » Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:06 am

IanAnd wrote:
With regard to the former comment, the process of returning is caused by a moment of desire for re-existence. If that desire has been cooled (or extinguished) it is likely one will KNOW this beforehand. Hence, non-returner. If one is a non-returner, he generally KNOWS such beforehand.


So according to this reasoning, does that mean that anyone who is a practising Buddhist who knowingly has no desire for re-existence/rebirth (or for sensuality) is an Anagami ?

With kind wishes,

Aloka
User avatar
Aloka
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: Criteria for once-returner and non-returner

Postby Zom » Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:44 am

Is it that a once-returner has recognized that sensuality and ill-will are the central problems which can be addressed by the malleability of mind afforded by stream-entry, and has committed to eradicating them, at which point they are non-returners? Much like a stream-entrant has rejected self-view but still experiences becoming and birth, and becomes an arahant when that is eradicated?


Practice for all of them is the same - cultivating factors of the Noble Eightfold Path, deminishing unwholesome qualities, increasing wholesome. No one can say "when" you reach or shift from this stage to that - this is all individual.

What is more - there are not 4 stages, but much more, if you look at it in detail. For example, there can be 3 types of stream-enteres, 5 types of non-returners, depending on the strength of their qualities. And hardly you can say when you move from 3rd non-returner level to 4th -)

“Bhikkhus, there are these five faculties. What five? The faculty of faith, energy, mindfulness, concentration, wisdom. These are the five faculties.

1) “One, bhikkhus, who has completed and fulfilled these five faculties is an arahant.
2) If they are weaker than that, one is an attainer of Nibbāna in the interval; (non-returner №5)
3) if still weaker, an attainer of Nibbāna upon landing; (non-returner №4)
4) if still weaker, an attainer of Nibbāna without exertion; (non-returner №3)
5) if still weaker, an attainer of Nibbāna with exertion; (non-returner №2)
6) if still weaker, one who is bound upstream, heading towards the Akaniṭṭha realm; (non-returner №1)
7) if still weaker, a once-returner;
8) if still weaker, a one-seeder; (stream-enterer №3)
9) if still weaker, a clan-to-clanner; (stream-enterer №2)
10) if still weaker, a seven-lives-at-moster; (stream-enterer №1)
11) if still weaker, a Dhamma-follower; (that on the path to stream-entry №2)
12) if still weaker, a faith-follower (that on the path to stream-entry №1)

SN 48.24 - http://www.palicanon.org/index.php/sutt ... -faculties

Also compare with 48.18:

“Bhikkhus, there are these five faculties. What five? The faculty of faith … the faculty of wisdom. These are the five faculties.

1) “One who has completed and fulfilled these five faculties is an arahant.
2) If they are weaker than that, one is practising for the realization of the fruit of arahantship;
3) if still weaker, one is a nonreturner;
4) if still weaker, one is practising for the realization of the fruit of nonreturning;
5) if still weaker, one is a once-returner;
6) if still weaker, one is practising for the realization of the fruit of once-returning;
7) if still weaker, one is a stream-enterer;
8) if still weaker, one is practising for the realization of the fruit of stream-entry.
9) But, bhikkhus, I say that one in whom these five faculties are completely and totally absent is ‘an outsider, one who stands in the faction of worldlings.’


Also, according to AN 10.75, even in one category of all these mentioned (once-returner in the sutta) there can be difference in qualities. So these things are not black-and-white.
User avatar
Zom
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg


Return to General Theravāda discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: piotr, Sam Vara, seeker242 and 6 guests