http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .ntbb.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;tiltbillings wrote:Discourse 11? PTS reference?
Paragraph 7.
Metta,
Retro.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .ntbb.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;tiltbillings wrote:Discourse 11? PTS reference?
MN i 65.retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Tilt,
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .ntbb.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;tiltbillings wrote:Discourse 11? PTS reference?
Paragraph 7.
Metta,
Retro.
This is a good thing. If there is no name, then there is no name.Stefan said: I am asking what the name is, not create a new one.
“So long, bhikkhus, as I did not directly know as they really are the gratification, the danger, and the escape in the case of these four elements, I did not claim to have awakened to the unsurpassed perfect enlightenment in this world with its devas, Måra, and Brahmå, in this generation with its recluses and brahmins, its devas and humans...The knowledge and vision arose in me: ‘Unshakeable is my liberation of mind; this is my last birth; now there is no more re-becoming" SN14.31 (2) Before My Enlightenment
If you have to give a name to them, I'd go for "The 3 Aspects". "Standpoints" don't make sense here.Stephen K wrote:I took the term "standpoints" from here. Does the "Three Standpoints" sound OK?
They don't have one, but if one were needed, then "four noble truths compressed to three" would do, based on the equivalences given in the Nettipakaraṇa Atthakathā: