Manapa wrote:would it be unwholesome to include oneself, family or friends in standard practice?


Stefan wrote:Manapa wrote:would it be unwholesome to include oneself, family or friends in standard practice?
No.
But I've just never heard or read of animals being included. Hence why I asked.
Wishing: In gladness and in safety, May all beings be at ease. Whatever living beings there may be; Whether they are weak or strong, omitting none, The great or the mighty, medium, short or small, The seen and the unseen, Those living near and far away, Those born and to-be-born — May all beings be at ease! Let none deceive another, Or despise any being in any state. Let none through anger or ill-will Wish harm upon another. Even as a mother protects with her life Her child, her only child, So with a boundless heart Should one cherish all living beings; Radiating kindness over the entire world: Spreading upwards to the skies, And downwards to the depths; Outwards and unbounded, Freed from hatred and ill-will. Whether standing or walking, seated or lying down Free from drowsiness, One should sustain this recollection.

BlackBird wrote:I find it a lot easier to be friendly towards animals than I do some humans, put it that way

BlackBird wrote:I find it a lot easier to be friendly towards animals than I do some humans, put it that way
Stefan wrote:Right, what I meant was: usually we send metta to five persons - an extremely intimate, a lovable, an indifferent, an unpleasant, and a hostile one. Could one include one's pet in one of these, e.g. as a 'lovable'?


Return to General Theravāda discussion
Registered users: Bakmoon, barcsimalsi, Ben, Bing [Bot], ck_c, cooran, Exabot [Bot], fivebells, Google [Bot], Kamran, Majjhima Patipada, male_robin, Sekha