chownah wrote:I guess the Buddha knew how to fry eggs but of course he didn't teach that..... Why must we think that all the other leaves are such big deals....some or maybe even most are quite mundane....I guess.
You may well have guessed correctly... but even if not, it doesn't matter.
The Buddha was clear on his reasons for teaching the things he taught, and likewise, for not teaching what he did not teach.
"Having understood name-and-form, which is a product of prolificity,
And which is the root of all malady within and without,
He is released from bondage to the root of all maladies,
That Such-like-one is truly known as 'the one who has understood'." (Snp 3.6)
"Whether I were to preach in brief, Sāriputta, or whether I were to preach in detail, Sāriputta, or whether I were to preach both in brief or in detail, Sāriputta, rare are those who understand." (A I 333, Sāriputtasutta)