Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
User avatar
Paul Davy
Posts: 16137
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

Postby Paul Davy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:59 am

Greetings,

Does the concept of "change of lineage" that is found in the Visuddhimagga have any relevance to the retaining of the wisdom associated with the path and fruit of nobility?

Metta,
Retro. :)
What is the final conviction that comes when radical attention is razor-edge sharp? That the object of the mind is mind-made (manomaya). (Ven. Ñāṇananda)

Having understood name-and-form, which is a product of prolificity,
And which is the root of all malady within and without,
He is released from bondage to the root of all maladies,
That Such-like-one is truly known as 'the one who has understood'.
(Snp 3.6)

Stuart
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:24 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

Postby Stuart » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:01 pm

Kevin, All :anjali:

Thank you for your input. I started writing a response, but I think that I need to go and contemplate this for a while. ... :thinking: ...

Stuart
xxx

User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

Postby ground » Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:25 am

If panna would be an affirmatory positive phenomenon and not a mere removal then it would be a product and therefore impermanent even from the perspective of the subject.

Kind regards

User avatar
Paul Davy
Posts: 16137
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

Postby Paul Davy » Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:20 am

Greetings,

TMingyur wrote:If panna would be an affirmatory positive phenomenon and not a mere removal then it would be a product and therefore impermanent even from the perspective of the subject.

Yes, it's this kind of logic that makes me wary of 'accumulations'.

Which in turn brings in the question of the comparability of the terms vijjha and panna

Metta,
Retro. :)
What is the final conviction that comes when radical attention is razor-edge sharp? That the object of the mind is mind-made (manomaya). (Ven. Ñāṇananda)

Having understood name-and-form, which is a product of prolificity,
And which is the root of all malady within and without,
He is released from bondage to the root of all maladies,
That Such-like-one is truly known as 'the one who has understood'.
(Snp 3.6)

User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

Postby ground » Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:14 am

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings,

TMingyur wrote:If panna would be an affirmatory positive phenomenon and not a mere removal then it would be a product and therefore impermanent even from the perspective of the subject.

Yes, it's this kind of logic that makes me wary of 'accumulations'.

Which in turn brings in the question of the comparability of the terms vijjha and panna

Metta,
Retro. :)


Yes you may be right here that we may be actually talking about different phenomena. I just looked it up - panna - means "discerning wisdom". "Discerning" actually may be based on an affirmatory sort of wisdom that is impermanent due to being produced and also since it is dependent on impermanent concentration.

I could not find "vijjha" but just found Vijja-bhagiya Sutta
"These two qualities have a share in clear knowing. Which two? Tranquillity (samatha) & insight (vipassana).

"When tranquillity is developed, what purpose does it serve? The mind is developed. And when the mind is developed, what purpose does it serve? Passion is abandoned.

"When insight is developed, what purpose does it serve? Discernment is developed. And when discernment is developed, what purpose does it serve? Ignorance is abandoned.

"Defiled by passion, the mind is not released. Defiled by ignorance, discernment does not develop. Thus from the fading of passion is there awareness-release. From the fading of ignorance is there discernment-release."

So according to this "insight" entails "panna" (discernment).

What does "Vijja-bhagiya" mean?
If you implied this term when you said "vijja" then "clear knowing" may be actually what I described as "removal" and i confused it with panna since here it reads:
1. Passion is abandoned (i.e. removal)
2. Ignorance is abandoned (i.e. removal)

Kind regards

User avatar
Paul Davy
Posts: 16137
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

Postby Paul Davy » Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:15 am

Greetings,

Yes, I meant vijja.

:thumbsup:

Metta,
Retro. :)
What is the final conviction that comes when radical attention is razor-edge sharp? That the object of the mind is mind-made (manomaya). (Ven. Ñāṇananda)

Having understood name-and-form, which is a product of prolificity,
And which is the root of all malady within and without,
He is released from bondage to the root of all maladies,
That Such-like-one is truly known as 'the one who has understood'.
(Snp 3.6)

Stuart
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:24 pm
Location: London, UK.

Re: Panna Gained / Panna Lost?

Postby Stuart » Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:39 pm

Thank -you all :anjali:

This is also helping me to understand better:

"Not Sure" - The Standard of the Noble Ones - Ajahn Chah

Stuart
xxx


Return to “General Theravāda discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], WontonCarter, Yahoo [Bot] and 11 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine