My answer is relevent. Metta is not the final enlightened state. Brahmavihara are not the way to arahantship or Nibbana.Individual wrote:That doesn't seem to be relevant to my question, so I guess the answer is no. All love is conditional, except the love of Arahants and Buddhas.
Women can't become Buddhas?
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Last edited by Element on Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Why is metta not an enlightened state?Element wrote:My answer is relevent. Metta is not an enlightened state. Brahmavihara are not the way to arahantship or Nibbana.Individual wrote:That doesn't seem to be relevant to my question, so I guess the answer is no. All love is conditional, except the love of Arahants and Buddhas.
Wasn't the Buddha the embodiment of metta and that's why he taught the dhamma?
Ty.
Annabel
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Element, I find this post of yours fascinating, but could you please explain some more, perhaps where I can read this in the sutras. I would like to get a link from you, or an explanation for the bolded.Element wrote:Buddha said in the DN: A man serves his wife in five ways. Thus being served, a woman returns her love in five ways. Man is to support and serve. A woman's love should be conditional. Thus, a man has unconditional love and a woman conditional love. This is the optimal way of nature or dhamma. If one holds a woman serves and gives unconditionality, the world will be lost. A woman loves a man when he does right.Individual wrote:Can you cite suttas where the Buddha said that compassion was a "male" quality and neediness was a "female" quality?
'Should have' you probably meant. Why so? I am neutrally curious to learn more.Thus, a man has unconditional love and a woman conditional love.
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Annabel wrote: ...perhaps where I can read this in the sutras. I would like to get a link from you, or an explanation for the bolded.
"In five ways, young householder, should a wife as the West be ministered to by a husband:
(i) by being courteous to her,
(ii) by not despising her,
(iii) by being faithful to her,
(iv) by handing over authority to her,
(v) by providing her with adornments.
"The wife thus ministered to as the West by her husband shows her compassion to her husband in five ways:
(i) she performs her duties well,
(ii) she is hospitable to relations and attendants10
(iii) she is faithful,
(iv) she protects what he brings,
(v) she is skilled and industrious in discharging her duties.
Sigalovada Sutta
Hi AnnabelThus, a man has unconditional love and a woman conditional love.
'Should have' you probably meant. Why so? I am neutrally curious to learn more.
I am provoking some thought . Merely a personal interpretation. I do however believe in a woman's power to stimulate goodness in a man.
Kind regards
Element
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Hi, Element, thank you for the sutta.
I share your belief a woman can (and should) stimulate the good in a man.
I share your belief a woman can (and should) stimulate the good in a man.
Last edited by Annapurna on Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Buddha had perfect metta due to his enlightenment as his mind due to his enlightenment was free from greed, hatred and delusion.Annabel wrote:Why is metta not an enlightened state?
Wasn't the Buddha the embodiment of metta and that's why he taught the dhamma?
However, I was saying one does not need to be fully enlightened to practise some metta.
With unenlightened metta
Element
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 6493
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Mae Wang Huai Rin, Li District, Lamphun
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Hi Dhammakid,
In fact the latter teaching is accounted for with reference to another Sutta doctrine: that of the Great Man (mahāpurisa) and his thirty-two marks.
Best wishes,
Dhammanando Bhikkhu
But as I mentioned earlier in the thread, the commentators do not draw any connection between the Abhidhamma teaching on kamma-originated materiality and the Sutta teaching on the impossibility of a Sammāsambuddha being female.Dhammakid wrote:As do I. And if the statement "Theravada rejects the idea that females can become Buddhas because feminine dhammas are a result of inferior kammas in any age" is true, then I cannot agree with that either.
In fact the latter teaching is accounted for with reference to another Sutta doctrine: that of the Great Man (mahāpurisa) and his thirty-two marks.
Best wishes,
Dhammanando Bhikkhu
Yena yena hi maññanti,
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
There is no compelling explanation why.Elohim wrote:One reason I disagree with Theravada on this point is that I have yet to see a compelling explanation why.
There is no compelling explanation why not, either.
So it would seem what you are really doing is valuing your own preferences over the teachings of the Buddha. Is that wise?
Awesome! Let's vote on what is Dhamma and what isn't! The votes of a bunch of unawakened folks is sure to lead us all to awakening.Annabel wrote:Seconded.Elohim wrote:...
- Peter
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
What I am doing, Peter, is being open to all the available evidence and using my critical thinking skills to make decisions for myself.Peter wrote:So it would seem what you are really doing is valuing your own preferences over the teachings of the Buddha. Is that wise?
And yes, I think that is wise.
"Sabbe dhamma nalam abhinivesaya" (AN 7.58).
leaves in the hand (Buddhist-related blog)
leaves in the forest (non-Buddhist related blog)
leaves in the hand (Buddhist-related blog)
leaves in the forest (non-Buddhist related blog)
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
And what evidence do you have that a woman can become a sammasambuddha? Have you met or heard of a female sammasambuddha?Elohim wrote:What I am doing, Peter, is being open to all the available evidence and using my critical thinking skills to make decisions for myself.Peter wrote:So it would seem what you are really doing is valuing your own preferences over the teachings of the Buddha. Is that wise?
- Peter
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Peter,
Jason
What has lead me to this opinion are the educated opinions of both monastics and scholars, as well as the inconsistency of this teaching in relation to others such as the fact that gender is not an issue in determining a person's ability to attain release. If women have the same ability to achieve enlightenment as men, what precludes them from being capable of rediscovering the Dhamma and teaching it to others? I have found women to be capable teachers and capable of being pioneers in any field.Peter wrote:And what evidence do you have that a woman can become a sammasambuddha? Have you met or heard of a female sammasambuddha?
Jason
"Sabbe dhamma nalam abhinivesaya" (AN 7.58).
leaves in the hand (Buddhist-related blog)
leaves in the forest (non-Buddhist related blog)
leaves in the hand (Buddhist-related blog)
leaves in the forest (non-Buddhist related blog)
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Everyone with a little sense of logic knows that one can't prove a negative.Peter wrote:There is no compelling explanation why.Elohim wrote:One reason I disagree with Theravada on this point is that I have yet to see a compelling explanation why.
There is no compelling explanation why not, either.
Do you think the teachings of the Buddha are based on preferences?So it would seem what you are really doing is valuing your own preferences over the teachings of the Buddha. Is that wise?
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Hi bhante,
Thank you for your previous answer.
Thank you for your previous answer.
Isn't it also connected to the idea that one's vows can be fulfilled only when one has the same sex as when was making a vow? Commentary says that women don't fit to aspire for escape from the world, hence can not become buddhas.Dhammanando wrote:In fact the latter teaching is accounted for with reference to another Sutta doctrine: that of the Great Man (mahāpurisa) and his thirty-two marks.
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
I see no reason for you to overinterpret my post in a hostile manner....Peter wrote:There is no compelling explanation why.Elohim wrote:One reason I disagree with Theravada on this point is that I have yet to see a compelling explanation why.
There is no compelling explanation why not, either.
So it would seem what you are really doing is valuing your own preferences over the teachings of the Buddha. Is that wise?
Awesome! Let's vote on what is Dhamma and what isn't! The votes of a bunch of unawakened folks is sure to lead us all to awakening.Annabel wrote:Seconded.Elohim wrote:...
[Personal remarks unnecessary to the topic edited out via the moderator.]
Re: Women can't be enlightened?
Jason, I understand your argumentation perfectly, it seems a transcendental view of gender to me.Elohim wrote:Peter,
What has lead me to this opinion are the educated opinions of both monastics and scholars, as well as the inconsistency of this teaching in relation to others such as the fact that gender is not an issue in determining a person's ability to attain release. If women have the same ability to achieve enlightenment as men, what precludes them from being capable of rediscovering the Dhamma and teaching it to others? I have found women to be capable teachers and capable of being pioneers in any field.Peter wrote:And what evidence do you have that a woman can become a sammasambuddha? Have you met or heard of a female sammasambuddha?
Jason
But I'm afraid it is lost to those men who will defend this argument because it feeds their ego.
You will also meet women who disagree, but don't dare to voice it, because they don''t want to appear adhamma or deluded or are the apple polishers of men and dogmas. . .
It is well possible that "women can't be SammasamBuddhas" was added later.
Anybody Prove me wrong if you can.
Can you?