Anatta in Scientific American Mind

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Post Reply
User avatar
Nibbida
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:44 am

Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by Nibbida »

The July 2010 issue of Scientific American Mind has an article on the nature of the self:

* "We perceive the “I” as stable, but the self is actually a construct that the brain works constantly to maintain.
* Self-knowledge involves both simple mental processes, such as knowing where one’s body is in space, and complex ones, such as fabricating a life story out of past events.
* A critical aspect of self-awareness is the ability to recognize and temper one’s emotions."

http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... self-and-i
User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 5584
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by Kim OHara »

...and an article on gaps in perception at New Scientist
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... sight.html
Which feeds right into the other one, since our sense that we perceive things reliably contributes to the myth that we 'are' unitary, cohesive 'selves'.
:namaste:
Kim
User avatar
Nibbida
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:44 am

Re: Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by Nibbida »

It's amazing how much attention is the foundation for what we perceive as reality.

Thanks for posting that.
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by tiltbillings »

Nibbida wrote:It's amazing how much attention is the foundation for what we perceive as reality.

Thanks for posting that.
Attention is the core of the Buddha's teaching about reality, which can be wrongly perceived or rightly perceived based upon the nature of the attention we cultivate. http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 628#p74628" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
Goedert
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: SC, Brazil

Re: Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by Goedert »

This is a good article.

But the Buddha discovered it a long time ago.
User avatar
octathlon
Posts: 599
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:06 am
Location: USA

Re: Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by octathlon »

Thanks, Nibbida. I'll read that when I go to the library. I like those kinds of articles.

Kim, on that video... I wonder if someone proficient in vipassana meditation would be more, or less, likely to notice the changes? Just the other day I saw a related demonstration:
http://www.quirkology.com/UK/Video_Colo ... rick.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 5584
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by Kim OHara »

Absolutely relevant :smile: and pretty neat, too.
I don't know if vipassana meditation would help anyone be more aware of all the changes.
I think the main difficulty is to do with how many things we can can give our attention to in the time available. We ignore what we think is unimportant so that we can maximise our attention on what we think is important. That is a pretty good survival strategy - and that is probably why we do it: if our ancestors stopped to admire the butterflies when a sabre-tooth tiger was after them, they didn't live long enough to become our ancestors.
Some people are better at observing than others, and most can improve with practice and training. (Look up "Kim's game" (named after the character whose name I adopted, not after me) for instance .)
And I recommended Quirkology to Cooran just a couple of days ago ... small world, huh?

Kim
User avatar
octathlon
Posts: 599
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:06 am
Location: USA

Re: Anatta in Scientific American Mind

Post by octathlon »

Kim O'Hara wrote: And I recommended Quirkology to Cooran just a couple of days ago ... small world, huh?
Kim
Oh, that is probably how I wound up on that site, then. :D :thanks: I couldn't remember how I came across it. The internet is a lot like our minds, click click click, one link leads to another, and another, and another. :juggling:
Post Reply