YOU CANNOT POST. OUR WEB HOSTING COMPANY DECIDED TO MOVE THE SERVER TO ANOTHER LOCATION. IN THE MEANTIME, YOU CAN VIEW THIS VERSION WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW POSTING AND WILL NOT SAVE ANYTHING YOU DO ONCE THE OTHER SERVER GOES ONLINE.

Jaina criticism of Buddhist Kammic Theory - Dhamma Wheel

Jaina criticism of Buddhist Kammic Theory

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Bankei
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Jaina criticism of Buddhist Kammic Theory

Postby Bankei » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:00 am

I believe the early Jains criticised the Buddha's emphasis on intention in the role of Kamma. I recall reading about this somewhere. The argument went something similar to this:

Imagine there is a baby wrapped in a blanket. The Buddhist thinking it is a large durian fruit stabs it several times with a knife, killing the baby. According to Buddhist theory there would be no kammic consequences generated because there was no intention to kill.

Now imagine there is a durian fruit and the Buddhist thinking it is a baby stabs it several times with the intention to kill. Buddhist theory would have that there are kammic consequences even though no harm was done.

Does anyone know where this debate occurs and what the Buddhist response was?

Thanks

Bankei
-----------------------
Bankei

User avatar
Sekha
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Jaina criticism of Buddhist Kammic Theory

Postby Sekha » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:12 am

Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org

User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
Posts: 10648
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Contact:

Re: Jaina criticism of Buddhist Kammic Theory

Postby David N. Snyder » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:09 pm

There is a story in the Suttas (don't remember the exact reference right now) where the Buddha talks about a baby that has some piece of wood or some obstruction stuck in its throat. The Buddha advises that it is okay to draw out the object, even drawing blood, even causing the baby to cry; to get the obstruction out and save the baby's life (implying that the Jaina position would be to not remove the obstruction because violence would be needed and pain would be inflicted and the baby would die).
Image





Return to “General Theravāda discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kim OHara and 32 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine