Besides all discussion about credentials:
"In 2006 Vimalaramsi was nominated to become the first USA Representative for the World Buddhist Supreme Summit Council which meets every two years. Upon approval he was inaugurated into this lifetime position on November 1, 2008 in the New Royal Grand Hall of Buddhism in Japan. The Summit represents 32 countries where Buddhism is taught through the three main schools of buddhism. The summit was originally formed in 1998 when H.H. the Dalai Lama of Tibet, Ven. Dr. Enshinjoh of Japan, and the H.H. Sangha Raja of Thailand came together with this idea. The summit seeks to re-examine the fundamental teachings and practice of the Buddha in order to help the three schools of Buddhism to recognize their commonalities in this 21st Century."
He is the laughing one:
from: http://picasaweb.google.com/Begintosee/ ... Part1Album#" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
American Buddhist Forest Tradition
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Who knows. A lot of stuff that is not terribly "impressive." There are other teachers whose "credentials" come across a bit more solidly and genuinely based.Hoo wrote:Like was said in another post, if you or other folks still have questions, they might be served best by taking it to the source - go to the website and ask questions in whatever venue they have for that. It beats discussing shadows and ghosts, which one is right and the most substantial.
Hoo
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Thanks for your view on it, Tilt. I've never been involved in reviewing credentials for monks, though I've read a few resumes in my time. Do you see elements missing from those credentials that a newbie would do well to look for when considering the center or the Venerable for a visit or a retreat? They seem to have a number of Dhamma talks in print or recorded on the website and I'd first spend some time on them, of course, to see if they speak to my Dhamma needs and practice needs.tiltbillings wrote:Who knows. A lot of stuff that is not terribly "impressive." There are other teachers whose "credentials" come across a bit more solidly and genuinely based.
I can vouch for the center physically being there They were still expanding on the complex, but it appeared to be functional from what little I saw in my brief visits. I had thought I'd do some retreat there this year but I'm really not yet tamed enough for polite Buddhist company I also discovered some retreats at a closer Chan monastery, and then my health got in the way of being very far from home or gone very often. I'm hoping that will change soon and I can get around better. I haven't seen a flesh and blood Buddhist in six months.
Hoo
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
off topic:
to me, you appear not to have much faith in general. How about meditation preparing exercises like Dana? Do you meditate? Do you have a teacher?
Be Well,
Mirco
Hi tiltbillings,tiltbillings wrote:Who knows. A lot of stuff that is not terribly "impressive." There are other teachers whose "credentials" come across a bit more solidly and genuinely based.Hoo wrote:Like was said in another post, if you or other folks still have questions, they might be served best by taking it to the source - go to the website and ask questions in whatever venue they have for that. It beats discussing shadows and ghosts, which one is right and the most substantial.
to me, you appear not to have much faith in general. How about meditation preparing exercises like Dana? Do you meditate? Do you have a teacher?
Be Well,
Mirco
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Certainly not in Ven V, but outside of that, you have no basis for making such a personal judgment about another person whom you have not met.mirco wrote:off topic:
Hi tiltbillings,tiltbillings wrote:Who knows. A lot of stuff that is not terribly "impressive." There are other teachers whose "credentials" come across a bit more solidly and genuinely based.Hoo wrote:Like was said in another post, if you or other folks still have questions, they might be served best by taking it to the source - go to the website and ask questions in whatever venue they have for that. It beats discussing shadows and ghosts, which one is right and the most substantial.
to me, you appear not to have much faith in general.
And how is any of that your business?How about meditation preparing exercises like Dana? Do you meditate? Do you have a teacher?
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Are there other centers that claim to be an American tradition besides Dhamma Sukkha? Bhante Vimalaramsi is the only one to be making that claim that I've run across but I'm not widely read or traveled.
Hoo
Hoo
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
"an American tradition" What does that mean?Hoo wrote: Are there other centers that claim to be an American tradition besides Dhamma Sukkha? Bhante Vimalaramsi is the only one to be making that claim that I've run across but I'm not widely read or traveled.
Hoo
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
- jcsuperstar
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am
- Location: alaska
- Contact:
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
at this point probably nothing good. if history shows us anything (other than that people never learn anything) for Buddhism to take root in new culture and become a part of that culture it takes pretty much a monarch converting and royal support of the religion. doesn't look like that is a possibility anytime soon. also one thing i've noticed about American lay Buddhists, and other western lay Buddhists too (though this is a broad generalization) as compared to the Thai lay Buddhists I've known, is that here you get people who form almost cult like tendencies around certain teachers, where as with Thai people i've seen them respect teachers who may in many ways be very opposed to each other's views of the dhamma, so you'll see say a Thai person who is a "fan" of both lp Buddhadasa and also some "magic" monk. where as a western follower of lp Buddhadasa generally will be rabidly against any sort of rite or ritual, magic what-have-you. or you have people who take one monk as a teacher and exclude the views of other teachers or even consider them as unorthodox or unbuddhist.tiltbillings wrote:"an American tradition" What does that mean?Hoo wrote: Are there other centers that claim to be an American tradition besides Dhamma Sukkha? Bhante Vimalaramsi is the only one to be making that claim that I've run across but I'm not widely read or traveled.
Hoo
สัพเพ สัตตา สุขีตา โหนตุ
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Good question, Tilt. Hopefully someone here knows more about it than you and I and can answer our questions.tiltbillings wrote:"an American tradition" What does that mean?
Hoo
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Does it mean for example that those who have their origin outside of the USA will be excluded ? Or What ?
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Certainly not. No one will be excluded.PeterB wrote:Does it mean for example that those who have their origin outside of the USA will be excluded ? Or What ?
I understand it thus: The culturale roots of the teacher are american.
No rituals and rites from asia, as you can often find in Theravadan Thai, Sri Lankan, etc. temples and monasteries.
The point is, I think, that you can find a lot of Buddhist places where there are recitations and rites connected to that very culture the founders come from. Also having the lays reciting stuff in Pali without explaining is quite common, as I heard.
They also have a trining program for foreign monks at the Dhamma Sukha Meditation Center, where tey can learn how to teach Dhamma in that easy language instead of using e.g. Pali terms and not knowing how to explain it in english, because they don't know tha language that well.
And this is the difference: plain english only, easy to understand wording, nothing will disappear in some unexplained exotic mist.
Metta, always,
Mirco
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
I got an really helpfull reminder from a friend on this theme:
"Whatever the pros & cons of the monk in question, do not expect to change anyones mind or even raise interest.
Also dont try using reasoned arguments, it will all end in tears."
Yeahhh... tend to forget about the wise things.
Instead I am busy with creating kamma by 7.craving, 8.clinging, 9.my habitual tendencies (becoming) and 10.the birth of verbal action.
Be well
Mirco
"Whatever the pros & cons of the monk in question, do not expect to change anyones mind or even raise interest.
Also dont try using reasoned arguments, it will all end in tears."
Yeahhh... tend to forget about the wise things.
Instead I am busy with creating kamma by 7.craving, 8.clinging, 9.my habitual tendencies (becoming) and 10.the birth of verbal action.
Be well
Mirco
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Such great wise words!mirco wrote: "Whatever the pros & cons of the monk in question, do not expect to change anyones mind or even raise interest.
Also dont try using reasoned arguments, it will all end in tears."
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Wise words? More a sad commentary on the emotional investment people are capable of making in another human being without due consideration, which is why so many of us get sucked into unwise associations with questionable teachers.Goedert wrote:Such great wise words!mirco wrote: "Whatever the pros & cons of the monk in question, do not expect to change anyones mind or even raise interest.
Also dont try using reasoned arguments, it will all end in tears."
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: American Buddhist Forest Tradition
Hi Mirco,
The problem that can arise is insisting that one's favourite modern teacher has explained it all perfectly, and everyone else is wrong. Which seems to me to be rather unlikely, no matter who one's favourite modern teacher is...
MN 95 Canki Sutta:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Mike
I don't see any problem in pointing out the teachings of one's favourite teachers. The expositions of the Dhamma from particular teachers is particularly helpful to particular students.mirco wrote:I got an really helpfull reminder from a friend on this theme:
"Whatever the pros & cons of the monk in question, do not expect to change anyones mind or even raise interest.
Also dont try using reasoned arguments, it will all end in tears."
The problem that can arise is insisting that one's favourite modern teacher has explained it all perfectly, and everyone else is wrong. Which seems to me to be rather unlikely, no matter who one's favourite modern teacher is...
MN 95 Canki Sutta:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"But to what extent, Master Gotama, is there the safeguarding of the truth? To what extent does one safeguard the truth? We ask Master Gotama about the safeguarding of the truth."
"If a person has conviction, his statement, 'This is my conviction,' safeguards the truth. But he doesn't yet come to the definite conclusion that 'Only this is true; anything else is worthless.' To this extent, Bharadvaja, there is the safeguarding of the truth. To this extent one safeguards the truth. I describe this as the safeguarding of the truth. But it is not yet an awakening to the truth.
"If a person likes something... holds an unbroken tradition... has something reasoned through analogy... has something he agrees to, having pondered views, his statement, 'This is what I agree to, having pondered views,' safeguards the truth. But he doesn't yet come to the definite conclusion that 'Only this is true; anything else is worthless.' To this extent, Bharadvaja, there is the safeguarding of the truth. To this extent one safeguards the truth. I describe this as the safeguarding of the truth. But it is not yet an awakening to the truth.
Mike