puppha wrote:I would like to have your opinions about giving money to the Vihara/Wat/Temple: is it a meritorous deed or not?
The fact is that monks and nuns are prohibited by the Vinaya from holding or managing money. So on the face of it, putting money into the donation box of the Vihara would not be very skillful...
Cittasanto wrote:Well it isn't being givento or managed by them but the charity responcible for the Monastery, or at least that is how I understand its management at places I have been/in the west.
.
Bankei wrote:Cittasanto wrote:Well it isn't being givento or managed by them but the charity responcible for the Monastery, or at least that is how I understand its management at places I have been/in the west.
.
This would depend on the monastery involved and wouldn't always be the case.
Bankei wrote:I know of some monasteries in the west, which I have been to, which virtually treat donations as assets of the monks.
There are other monasteries in the west too which provide funds for the monks to travel to give teachings etc. Some monks are frequently flying around the countries and overseas to 'branch meetings',birthday celebrations etc.
And, in Thailand, the Wat opposite my house recently purchased a brand new 4 wheel drive for the abbot - he needs it so his driver can drive him to visit other temples on temple business. Many westerners think that Buddhists don't criticise monks, but in asia this is not the case and he was criticised for this and other spending with some locals refusing to attend that temple anymore.
Bankei wrote:... some locals refusing to attend that temple anymore.
David N. Snyder wrote:Electric bill
Gas (heating, stove) bill
Air conditioning
Water bill
Sewer bill
Garbage removal bill
General repairs to the building
Mortgage payment (if there is one)
All of the above must be paid. It can't be done without monetary donations from someone.
mikenz66 wrote:So in response to the OP: If there is a Wat that you think is worth supporting, support it.
If you think there is something shady about it, ignore it.
Cittasanto wrote:Bankei wrote:I know of some monasteries in the west, which I have been to, which virtually treat donations as assets of the monks.
There are other monasteries in the west too which provide funds for the monks to travel to give teachings etc. Some monks are frequently flying around the countries and overseas to 'branch meetings',birthday celebrations etc.
And, in Thailand, the Wat opposite my house recently purchased a brand new 4 wheel drive for the abbot - he needs it so his driver can drive him to visit other temples on temple business. Many westerners think that Buddhists don't criticise monks, but in asia this is not the case and he was criticised for this and other spending with some locals refusing to attend that temple anymore.
that may be but it is outside of my experience isn't it, I wasn't talking about all monasteries was I.
I do know if a monk is invited somewhere it is normal for the person/group to fund the travel, but sure this may not always be the case.
if you want to post something in contribution to a thread no need to be deliberately contrary.
Bankei wrote:Cittasanto wrote:Well it isn't being givento or managed by them but the charity responcible for the Monastery, or at least that is how I understand its management at places I have been/in the west.
.
This would depend on the monastery involved and wouldn't always be the case.
Cittasanto wrote:Bankei wrote:Cittasanto wrote:Well it isn't being givento or managed by them but the charity responcible for the Monastery, or at least that is how I understand its management at places I have been/in the west.
.
This would depend on the monastery involved and wouldn't always be the case.
What has what you got to say to do with my post?
Return to Theravāda for the modern world
Registered users: Alex123, Ben, Bing [Bot], Dan74, EmptyShadow, Google [Bot], Khalil Bodhi, knighter, Modus.Ponens, Mojo, MSN [Bot], palchi, porpoise, Zenainder