Cittasanto wrote:Hi Ground
That doesn't change what I thought you were saying, ...
Cittasanto wrote:there are other factors in the world other that kamma alone which determines what is possible.
The Blessed One said, "What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. [1] Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
ground wrote:Cittasanto wrote:Hi Ground
That doesn't change what I thought you were saying, ...
I did not expect that your perception to change.![]()
Cittasanto wrote:there are other factors in the world other that kamma alone which determines what is possible.
Well neither have I applied the term "kamma" nor have I been talking about the idea "kamma". I have been talking about ideas clinging to themselves which I have called "volition".
Besides what is your idea of "other factors"?The Blessed One said, "What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. [1] Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Kind regards
Cittasanto wrote:Besides what is your idea of "other factors"?The Blessed One said, "What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. [1] Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Kind regards
what do you think that quote says regarding the other factors I note?
Cittasanto wrote:Circumstance is the situations we are in, not all by our volition, be it the season, or how others treat us.
Disease is illness, something we do not volitionally bring upon ourselves, as in the three humours or a combination of the three.
carelessness is things that happen due to not paying attention, unwittingly done.
see SN36.21 http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... html#fnt-2
ground wrote:"Other factors" qua concept (i.e. idea) as factors that determine an effect or effects (this is the context here) either corresponds to forms, sounds, aromas ... (an idea may only correspond but can never be a form, sound etc.) or cannot be affirmed as "being more" than just an idea. "being more" is misleading since an idea can never be "more" than just an idea, "being more" just implies that there is a sense impression regarding the 5 senses which corresponds and conventionally (i.e. across several human individuals) may entail the idea "other factors" and the symbols "other factors" as means of linguistic expression. The latter (sense impression of the 5 senses ... - > idea and linguistic expression) is just an instance of dependent origination.
Cittasanto wrote:Circumstance is the situations we are in, not all by our volition, be it the season, or how others treat us.
Disease is illness, something we do not volitionally bring upon ourselves, as in the three humours or a combination of the three.
carelessness is things that happen due to not paying attention, unwittingly done.
see SN36.21 http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... html#fnt-2
Pretty ordinary ideas.
Kind regards
Cittasanto wrote:there are concepts and reality.
ground wrote:Cittasanto wrote:there are concepts and reality.
Pretty ordinary idea.
Kind regards
Cittasanto wrote:ground wrote:Cittasanto wrote:there are concepts and reality.
Pretty ordinary idea.
Kind regards
care to elaborate on that statement?
ground wrote:Well what can I say? I acknowledge that there are ideas. You have ideas, I have ideas. Humans have ideas. Ideas originating dependently as consciousness, conditioned by forms (letters), sounds (talking) in the context of further forms (seeing) and sounds (hearing) and aromas (smelling), etc. I can affirm ideas qua ideas. Besides this I can only refer (again) to SN35.23 quoted above.
Kind regards
Return to Theravāda for the modern world
Registered users: Ben, Bing [Bot], Coyote, Dan74, EmptyShadow, Google [Bot], Khalil Bodhi, knighter, Modus.Ponens, Mojo, MSN [Bot], palchi, porpoise, PRR, Zenainder