You are such a spoil-sport. More fun to just ask and see what happens.jcsuperstar wrote:the best way to know is to just hang out with them, see how they act, spend lots of time with them. and also sit sit sit, have some experiences yourself and ask about them. it no use to know what your teachers can and can not do, or have attained if you yourself aren't putting in the work and attaining things yourself.
Annapurna wrote:Sounds like you're questioning your various teachers attainments.
Don't they show in action?
See. If you don't ask, you'll never know.jcsuperstar wrote:Annapurna wrote:Sounds like you're questioning your various teachers attainments.
Don't they show in action?
we need that story Bhikkhu Pesala always posts about the monk who didnt know his teacher was an arahant...
jcsuperstar wrote:[
we need that story Bhikkhu Pesala always posts about the monk who didnt know his teacher was an arahant...
That is the whole point: you have to ask. If you don't ask, you don't get the good stories.Ben wrote:Hi James
I was with Goenkaji about 20 years ago . . . "Ariya is what Ariya does"
kind regards
Ben
Annapurna wrote:According to Venerable Phra Kru Kraisavilasa Metthavihari in Vipassana meditation a teacher is not allowed to speak about his attainments....
Best, then, to pester only lay teachers with such questions.pilgrim wrote:Its dangerous to ask this of a monk. If he makes a momentary slip and makes a false claim, its a parajika and he's no longer a monk.
pilgrim wrote:Its dangerous to ask this of a monk. If he makes a momentary slip and makes a false claim, its a parajika and he's no longer a monk.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... ti.html#pr
4. Should any bhikkhu, without direct knowledge, claim a superior human state, a truly noble knowledge and vision, as present in himself, saying, "Thus do I know; thus do I see," such that regardless of whether or not he is cross-examined on a later occasion, he — being remorseful and desirous of purification — might say, "Friends, not knowing, I said I know; not seeing, I said I see — vainly, falsely, idly," unless it was from over-estimation, he also is defeated and no longer in affiliation.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/vin/sv/bhikkhu-pati.html#pc
8. Should any bhikkhu report (his own) superior human state to an unordained person, when it is factual, it is to be confessed.
James the Giant wrote:The answer was quite unequivocal; "You just focus on your own progress, don't worry about anyone else's attainments.
Besides, we don't like talking about that."
Return to Theravāda for the modern world
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests