Ignorance

An open and inclusive investigation into Buddhism and spiritual cultivation

Ignorance

Postby ignobleone » Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:39 am

How do you deal with ignorance if even the authority is ignorant?
ignobleone
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: Ignorance

Postby ground » Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:55 am

Whatever arises, just don't touch. :sage:
User avatar
ground
 
Posts: 2592
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Ignorance

Postby Sam Vara » Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:11 am

ignobleone wrote:How do you deal with ignorance if even the authority is ignorant?


Could you clarify this a bit, and maybe give a concrete example of what you mean?

Do you mean how to deal with the ignorance of those who are supposed to be "authorities"? If I believe them to be ignorant, then to that extent I don't treat them as an "authority". I just assume that they don't have anything to offer me at that moment, perhaps because I don't understand them.

I have enough trouble with my own ignorance, never mind the supposed ignorance of others.
User avatar
Sam Vara
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm

Re: Ignorance

Postby Stephen K » Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:28 am

SN 35.80 wrote:"Lord, is there any one thing with whose abandoning in a monk ignorance is abandoned and clear knowing arises?"

"Yes monk, there is one thing with whose abandoning in a monk ignorance is abandoned and clear knowing arises."

"What is that one thing?"

"Ignorance, monk, is the one thing with whose abandoning in a monk ignorance is abandoned and clear knowing arises."

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Stephen K
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

Re: Ignorance

Postby ignobleone » Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:54 pm

Sam Vara wrote:
ignobleone wrote:How do you deal with ignorance if even the authority is ignorant?


Could you clarify this a bit, and maybe give a concrete example of what you mean?

Do you mean how to deal with the ignorance of those who are supposed to be "authorities"? If I believe them to be ignorant, then to that extent I don't treat them as an "authority". I just assume that they don't have anything to offer me at that moment, perhaps because I don't understand them.

I have enough trouble with my own ignorance, never mind the supposed ignorance of others.

If you don't treat them as an authority, you will get fined or jailed or etc. It's more to social issue than spiritual.
ignobleone
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: Ignorance

Postby ground » Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:22 am

ignobleone wrote:If you don't treat them as an authority, you will get fined or jailed or etc.

No issue if there is sufficient conviction in dhamma and sangha. Only if worldly concerns prevail there is an issue. :sage:
User avatar
ground
 
Posts: 2592
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Ignorance

Postby Cittasanto » Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:03 am

ground wrote:
ignobleone wrote:If you don't treat them as an authority, you will get fined or jailed or etc.

No issue if there is sufficient conviction in dhamma and sangha. Only if worldly concerns prevail there is an issue. :sage:

sure, yet there are ways in which a community/society operate. These should be respected as failure to do so when it is not against the Dhamma leads to decline and ruin.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
With Metta
Upāsaka Cittasanto
Blog, - Some Suttas Translated, Ajahn Chah.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."
User avatar
Cittasanto
 
Posts: 5743
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin

Re: Ignorance

Postby Sam Vara » Sat Oct 20, 2012 2:10 pm

ignobleone wrote:
Sam Vara wrote:
ignobleone wrote:How do you deal with ignorance if even the authority is ignorant?


Could you clarify this a bit, and maybe give a concrete example of what you mean?

Do you mean how to deal with the ignorance of those who are supposed to be "authorities"? If I believe them to be ignorant, then to that extent I don't treat them as an "authority". I just assume that they don't have anything to offer me at that moment, perhaps because I don't understand them.

I have enough trouble with my own ignorance, never mind the supposed ignorance of others.

If you don't treat them as an authority, you will get fined or jailed or etc. It's more to social issue than spiritual.


Ah, I see - this is about obeying the law?

I think Cittasanto's advice is good. Unless the law specifically forces one to break precepts, etc., then it makes a lot of sense to obey the law of the land. The same applies to commercial and institutional/organisational rules, and lots of benign social conventions. Failing to do as these prescribe can run you into a lot of trouble with other people and leads to conflict. Luckily, I live in a part of the world where I can "fit in" quite well and still practice the Dhamma.
User avatar
Sam Vara
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm

Re: Ignorance

Postby ignobleone » Sun Oct 21, 2012 3:29 am

- Ignorance is contagious.
- Ignorance = blindness
- Even a Buddha cannot remove one's ignorance
ignobleone
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: Ignorance

Postby Ben » Sun Oct 21, 2012 3:48 am

If I am not mistaken this thread is metadiscussion, thinly disguised.
I think that is a reasonable interpretation but I am hoping that ignobleone can correct me if I am wrong.
"One cannot step twice into the same river, nor can one grasp any mortal substance in a stable condition, but it scatters and again gathers; it forms and dissolves, and approaches and departs."

- Hereclitus


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 16079
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: Ignorance

Postby ground » Sun Oct 21, 2012 3:53 am

Cittasanto wrote:
ground wrote:
ignobleone wrote:If you don't treat them as an authority, you will get fined or jailed or etc.

No issue if there is sufficient conviction in dhamma and sangha. Only if worldly concerns prevail there is an issue. :sage:

sure, yet there are ways in which a community/society operate.

No issue. Ways are just ways.

Cittasanto wrote:These should be respected as failure to do so when it is not against the Dhamma leads to decline and ruin.

This is the view of the fearful "I"/self which may be helpful for some, yes.
Actually acting in harmony with conditions is just this: Acting in harmony with conditions. :sage:
User avatar
ground
 
Posts: 2592
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am


Return to Open Dhamma

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alex123 and 14 guests