An open and inclusive investigation into Buddhism and spiritual cultivation
by danieLion » Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:12 am
In BB's translation of the Majjhima Nikaya, at MN 124.41, his note to the sentence, "Then, seated in the midst of the Sangha of bhikkhus, the venerable Bakkula attained final NIbbana" (p. 988), says, "[The] Majjhima Nikaya Attakatha [commentary says]: Ven. Bakkula entered into meditation on the heat element and attained final Nibbana by causing his entire body to be consumed by that blaze. Only the relics remained" (p. 1338).
1. Does this relate to what we moderns call "spontaneous combustion"?
2. Did Reverend Bakkula commit suicide?
"You stop me, obviously with a demand for a personal explanation. 'How is it, you write, 'that you reject with such immitigable scorn the very foundation-stones of Buddhism, and yet refer disciples enthusiastically to the technique of some of its subtlest super-structures?'
I laff."
-Aleister Crowley,
Magick Without Tears,
Chapter XXVII: Structure of Mind Based on that of Body (Haeckel and Bertrand Russell)"Questions of reality are too important to be left to the scientists."
-Paul Feyerbend,
The Tyranny of Science, p. 51 (Polity: 2012).
-

danieLion
-
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
-
by robertk » Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:59 am
1. No.
2. No.
-

robertk
-
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am
-
by contemplating » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:58 pm
What is "meditation on the heat element" ? And why did he start meditating on the heat element?
-

contemplating
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:49 am
-
by daverupa » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:09 pm
That sutta is quite interesting; it's the only one I can recollect just now which includes chorus refrains as well as the text proper. Because of this, I'm inclined to see this as something of an early hagiographical piece, and with that the commentarial choice to give the event some bells and whistles seems par for the course.
"There is, headman, dhammasamādhi. If you were to obtain cittasamādhi in that, you might abandon this state of perplexity. And what, headman, is dhammasamādhi?
[kammapatha & brahmavihara, & a method of arousing gladness]"
- SN 42.13 - Pāṭaliya"Others will misapprehend according to their individual views, hold on to them tenaciously and not easily discard them; we shall not misapprehend according to individual views nor hold on to them tenaciously, but shall discard them with ease — thus effacement can be done."
- MN 8 - Sallekha Sutta
-

daverupa
-
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm
by santa100 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:33 pm
2 important background facts that could help explain what Ven. Bakkula did. He was around 160 years old at the time the sutta takes place (Bodhi's note [1167]), and he attained Arahanship on the 8th day of his going forth (Bodhi's note [1170]). So an arahant at 160 years of age would easily know the exact timing of his death and all he did was simply to save his fellow monks the heavy tasks of cleaning up a dead corpse as noted in [1172] by Daniel above:
[1172]MA. he had considered that all his life he had never made himself a burden to the other bhikkhus, and he did not want his body to be a burden after his death. THus he entered into meditation on the heat element and attained final Nibbana by causing his entire body to be consumed by the blaze. Only the relics remained.
Details on the Elements Kasina meditation could be found at Vsm V.5 (
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... on2011.pdf )
-
santa100
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:55 pm
-
by contemplating » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:16 pm
Thank you santa, for additional details and the link.
-

contemplating
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:49 am
-
by danieLion » Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:36 am
Thanks EVERYONE.

"You stop me, obviously with a demand for a personal explanation. 'How is it, you write, 'that you reject with such immitigable scorn the very foundation-stones of Buddhism, and yet refer disciples enthusiastically to the technique of some of its subtlest super-structures?'
I laff."
-Aleister Crowley,
Magick Without Tears,
Chapter XXVII: Structure of Mind Based on that of Body (Haeckel and Bertrand Russell)"Questions of reality are too important to be left to the scientists."
-Paul Feyerbend,
The Tyranny of Science, p. 51 (Polity: 2012).
-

danieLion
-
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
-
by danieLion » Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:43 am
robertk wrote:1. No.
2. No.
Hi Robert,
Not looking for a fight this time, and will likely simply accept your answer as sufficient, but can't help asking:
1. Why is this not related to what we call spontaneous combustion?
2. Why can't we classify it as suicide?
"You stop me, obviously with a demand for a personal explanation. 'How is it, you write, 'that you reject with such immitigable scorn the very foundation-stones of Buddhism, and yet refer disciples enthusiastically to the technique of some of its subtlest super-structures?'
I laff."
-Aleister Crowley,
Magick Without Tears,
Chapter XXVII: Structure of Mind Based on that of Body (Haeckel and Bertrand Russell)"Questions of reality are too important to be left to the scientists."
-Paul Feyerbend,
The Tyranny of Science, p. 51 (Polity: 2012).
-

danieLion
-
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
-
Return to Open Dhamma
Who is online
Registered users: Bing [Bot], convivium, Coyote, Crazy cloud, dannyj, EmptyShadow, Feathers, Google [Bot], Khalil Bodhi, Majestic-12 [Bot], mettafuture, michael_dorfman, mikenz66, Modus.Ponens, photonist, piotr, porpoise, purple planet, Sekha