An open and inclusive investigation into Buddhism and spiritual cultivation
by Cittasanto » Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:24 pm
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
With Metta
Upāsaka Cittasanto
Blog - Some Suttas Translated.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."
-

Cittasanto
-
- Posts: 5493
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin (Isle of Man - not part of the UK)
-
by daverupa » Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:40 pm
I wonder what mikenz66 has to say about it, seeing as how he inadvertently wrote some of it.

In their attempts to follow Buddhism, Western Buddhists like mikenz66, retrofuturist, and Jechbi have had to rethink the relationship between reason, religion, faith, knowledge and ethics which, unlike the Western philosophical tradition, aren't categories sharply distinguished in Buddhism.
"There is, headman, dhammasamādhi. If you were to obtain cittasamādhi in that, you might abandon this state of perplexity. And what, headman, is dhammasamādhi?
[kammapatha & brahmavihara, & a method of arousing gladness]"
- SN 42.13 - Pāṭaliya"Others will misapprehend according to their individual views, hold on to them tenaciously and not easily discard them; we shall not misapprehend according to individual views nor hold on to them tenaciously, but shall discard them with ease — thus effacement can be done."
- MN 8 - Sallekha Sutta
-

daverupa
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm
by Cittasanto » Sun Jan 06, 2013 1:26 am
daverupa wrote:I wonder what mikenz66 has to say about it, seeing as how he inadvertently wrote some of it.

In their attempts to follow Buddhism, Western Buddhists like mikenz66, retrofuturist, and Jechbi have had to rethink the relationship between reason, religion, faith, knowledge and ethics which, unlike the Western philosophical tradition, aren't categories sharply distinguished in Buddhism.
I thought it quite peculiar.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
With Metta
Upāsaka Cittasanto
Blog - Some Suttas Translated.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."
-

Cittasanto
-
- Posts: 5493
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin (Isle of Man - not part of the UK)
-
by Ben » Sun Jan 06, 2013 1:30 am
Actually, it was our friend zavk who wrote the paper, not Mike. But Mike, and some of us in Australia, who were interviewed by Ed.
Mike's gone off for a retreat, so perhaps you would like to address your questions to Zavk.
Kind regards,
Ben
-

Ben
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Cape Huay
-
by daverupa » Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:26 am
I didn't know there had been interviews; the impression I had was of simple forum research, so my comment was trying to encompass wonder at having been thoroughly cited in this modern way. Anyway, it was jokingly mentioned, whence 'inadvertently'.
I haven't got any questions about the paper; it's rather niche, and doesn't have any territory on my mind map.

"There is, headman, dhammasamādhi. If you were to obtain cittasamādhi in that, you might abandon this state of perplexity. And what, headman, is dhammasamādhi?
[kammapatha & brahmavihara, & a method of arousing gladness]"
- SN 42.13 - Pāṭaliya"Others will misapprehend according to their individual views, hold on to them tenaciously and not easily discard them; we shall not misapprehend according to individual views nor hold on to them tenaciously, but shall discard them with ease — thus effacement can be done."
- MN 8 - Sallekha Sutta
-

daverupa
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm
by Ben » Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:42 am
No worries, Dave.
I did contact Ed on Facebook and he mentioned that he was more than happy to answer any specific questions anyone has.
Kind regards,
Ben
-

Ben
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 14437
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Cape Huay
-
by Cittasanto » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:10 am
Ben wrote:No worries, Dave.
I did contact Ed on Facebook and he mentioned that he was more than happy to answer any specific questions anyone has.
Kind regards,
Ben
Cool.
When I came accross this I was looking through the site at what sort of papers were there, and if any would be of interest (of which several were). so Personally I don't know when I will read it but soon.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
With Metta
Upāsaka Cittasanto
Blog - Some Suttas Translated.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."
-

Cittasanto
-
- Posts: 5493
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin (Isle of Man - not part of the UK)
-
by mikenz66 » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:45 pm
Hi Dave,
daverupa wrote:I wonder what mikenz66 has to say about it, seeing as how he inadvertently wrote some of it.

In their attempts to follow Buddhism, Western Buddhists like mikenz66, retrofuturist, and Jechbi have had to rethink the relationship between reason, religion, faith, knowledge and ethics which, unlike the Western philosophical tradition, aren't categories sharply distinguished in Buddhism.
You mean my posts are inadvertent? That's probably taking anatta a little too far...
Mike
-

mikenz66
-
- Posts: 8590
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
- Location: New Zealand
by daverupa » Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:21 pm
Humor fail, on my part. 0/10
You wrote the posts, which ended up - through no intention of yours, thereby 'inadvertently' - comprising a not insignificant percentage of the paper's total word-count (and, thereby, 'wrote some').

"There is, headman, dhammasamādhi. If you were to obtain cittasamādhi in that, you might abandon this state of perplexity. And what, headman, is dhammasamādhi?
[kammapatha & brahmavihara, & a method of arousing gladness]"
- SN 42.13 - Pāṭaliya"Others will misapprehend according to their individual views, hold on to them tenaciously and not easily discard them; we shall not misapprehend according to individual views nor hold on to them tenaciously, but shall discard them with ease — thus effacement can be done."
- MN 8 - Sallekha Sutta
-

daverupa
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm
Return to Open Dhamma
Who is online
Registered users: Alex123, Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], BuddhaSoup, David N. Snyder, Doshin, EmptyShadow, Google [Bot], JohnWB, male_robin, Mindstar, Modus.Ponens, MSNbot Media, onaquest, palchi, reflection, richard_rca, robertk, Sekha, Zenainder