jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths - what can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
Post Reply
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by alan... »

so in buddhism we practice jhana with a clear intention in mind to regard them as nothing more than tools to see into reality.

however in hinduism i believe this is not the case. i have never found much consistency in hindu meditation teachings and have usually found them to be vague. this is because it is frequently a guru to student kind of thing as opposed to a systematized book learned practice. however assuming jhana is a universal state that arises for everyone when conditions are right it would be logical to assume that this is what yogis in hinduism experience as well but that they equate it with god instead of attempting to see it as mundane.

i imagine if i had fallen into hinduism instead of buddhism and a guru taught me to access the first jhana and said that that blissful state was accessing the mind of god i would heartily agree with him/her after reaching it as it feels more wonderful than anything else on earth.

i read an article about pre buddhist jhana but it doesn't specify whether or not this practice continued into hinduism or if it did, how it was/is regarded. at least not that i saw, i skimmed some and did a couple of ctrl+f word searches for words like "hinduism", "vedas" and so on. it talks about a group called "Parama-diṭṭhadhamma-nibbānavāda" or perhaps this is a person? i'm not clear on that and a web search was fruitless. does anyone know more of the details on this or have any opinions?
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by tiltbillings »

alan... wrote: . . .
You have stated, I believe that you do jhana practice. If that isthe case, then start playing with them. You can do all sorts of nifty things and have all sorts of nifty experiences.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by alan... »

tiltbillings wrote:
alan... wrote: . . .
You have stated, I believe that you do jhana practice. If that isthe case, then start playing with them. You can do all sorts of nifty things and have all sorts of nifty experiences.
cool! any suggestions?
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by ground »

alan... wrote:i imagine if i had fallen into hinduism instead of buddhism and a guru taught me to access the first jhana and said that that blissful state was accessing the mind of god i would heartily agree with him/her after reaching it as it feels more wonderful than anything else on earth.
Not necessarily to be restricted to hinduism, since there are contemplatives in christianity too. Or others may impute ideas like nibbana or buddhanature on this experience. How it is called is really of no relevance. Imagination is boundless. It is just an experience entailing the arising of ideas afterwards since the sense of self entails grasping experience as this or that. :sage:
User avatar
LonesomeYogurt
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:24 pm
Location: America

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by LonesomeYogurt »

tiltbillings wrote:You have stated, I believe that you do jhana practice. If that isthe case, then start playing with them. You can do all sorts of nifty things and have all sorts of nifty experiences.
Yes, "nifty experiences" that the Buddha clearly considered to be the foundation of the entire meditative practice.
[1] "If a monk would wish, 'May I be dear & pleasing to my fellows in the holy life, respected by & inspiring to them,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[2] "If a monk would wish, 'May I be someone who receives robes, almsfood, lodgings, & medical requisites for curing the sick,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[3] "If a monk would wish, 'Whatever I use or consume in terms of robes, almsfood, lodgings, & medical requisites for curing the sick, may that be of great fruit, of great benefit to those who provided them,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[4] "If a monk would wish, 'May it also be of great fruit, of great benefit, to whatever dead relatives they [the donors] recollect with brightened minds,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[5] "If a monk would wish, 'May I be content with whatever robes, almsfood, lodgings, & medical requisites for curing the sick are available,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[6] "If a monk would wish, 'May I be resistant to cold, heat, hunger, & thirst; to the touch of gadflies & mosquitoes, wind & sun & creeping things; to abusive, hurtful language; to bodily feelings that, when they arise, are painful, sharp, stabbing, fierce, distasteful, deadly,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[7] "If a monk would wish, 'May I overcome displeasure, and not be overcome by displeasure. May I dwell having conquered any displeasure that has arisen,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[8] "If a monk would wish, 'May I overcome fear & dread, and not be overcome by fear & dread. May I dwell having conquered any fear & dread that have arisen,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[9] "If a monk would wish, 'May I attain — whenever I want, without strain, without difficulty — the four jhanas that are heightened mental states, pleasant abidings in the here-&-now,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

[10] "If a monk would wish, 'May I — with the ending of mental fermentations — remain in the fermentation-free awareness-release & discernment-release, having directly known & realized them for myself in the here-&-now,' then he should be one who brings the precepts to perfection, who is committed to inner tranquillity of awareness, who does not neglect jhana, who is endowed with insight, and who frequents empty dwellings.

"'Monks, dwell consummate in virtue, consummate in terms of the Patimokkha. Dwell restrained in accordance with the Patimokkha, consummate in your behavior & sphere of activity. Train yourselves, having undertaken the training rules, seeing danger in the slightest faults.' Thus was it said. And in reference to this was it said."
I'm not sure if you're intentionally trying to minimize Jhana by dismissing it as "nifty," but if you are, then I'd be interested to know why.
Gain and loss, status and disgrace,
censure and praise, pleasure and pain:
these conditions among human beings are inconstant,
impermanent, subject to change.

Knowing this, the wise person, mindful,
ponders these changing conditions.
Desirable things don’t charm the mind,
undesirable ones bring no resistance.

His welcoming and rebelling are scattered,
gone to their end,
do not exist.
- Lokavipatti Sutta

Stuff I write about things.
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by tiltbillings »

alan... wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:
alan... wrote: . . .
You have stated, I believe that you do jhana practice. If that isthe case, then start playing with them. You can do all sorts of nifty things and have all sorts of nifty experiences.
cool! any suggestions?
You might start with the image of the Buddha, and if you are able to produce a radiant vision of the Buddha, you can move on to Vishnu or Zeus, and that sort of thing.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by tiltbillings »

LonesomeYogurt wrote:I'm not sure if you're intentionally trying to minimize Jhana by dismissing it as "nifty," but if you are, then I'd be interested to know why.
You keep accusing me of trying to minimize the jhanas, but that is not the case. Quite simply, the jhanas are tools that can be well handled or mishandled.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by alan... »

tiltbillings wrote:
LonesomeYogurt wrote:I'm not sure if you're intentionally trying to minimize Jhana by dismissing it as "nifty," but if you are, then I'd be interested to know why.
You keep accusing me of trying to minimize the jhanas, but that is not the case. Quite simply, the jhanas are tools that can be well handled or mishandled.
yup. if you bliss out and become an expert at the jhanas but do nothing else it can be an utter waste of time. or you can use them for insight and see through reality. then there's that mysterious "ninth jhana" which is itself nibbana. so if you get that high you're done i believe. but that's a ways up there.
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by alan... »

tiltbillings wrote:You might start with the image of the Buddha, and if you are able to produce a radiant vision of the Buddha, you can move on to Vishnu or Zeus, and that sort of thing.
any progress in the dhamma to be made with such things? that's one place i'm kind of at a loss, what do i do with my jhana concentration? i've read a couple of suggestions, such as tracing thoughts to their source, which works wonderfully as you see there is none, they are dependently arisen, but now what?
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by tiltbillings »

alan... wrote:there's that mysterious "ninth jhana" which is itself nibbana.
No, it is not nibbana. There are those monks who are not jhana masters who attained nibbana but could not attain the 9th. The 9th is something that those who have attained nibbana can attain.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
LonesomeYogurt
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:24 pm
Location: America

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by LonesomeYogurt »

tiltbillings wrote:
LonesomeYogurt wrote:I'm not sure if you're intentionally trying to minimize Jhana by dismissing it as "nifty," but if you are, then I'd be interested to know why.
You keep accusing me of trying to minimize the jhanas, but that is not the case. Quite simply, the jhanas are tools that can be well handled or mishandled.
I apologize if I sound accusatory, but you have to admit that "You can do all sorts of nifty things and have all sorts of nifty experiences" doesn't exactly reek of the respect the Buddha's preferred meditation might command. But I digress, back to the topic at hand.
Gain and loss, status and disgrace,
censure and praise, pleasure and pain:
these conditions among human beings are inconstant,
impermanent, subject to change.

Knowing this, the wise person, mindful,
ponders these changing conditions.
Desirable things don’t charm the mind,
undesirable ones bring no resistance.

His welcoming and rebelling are scattered,
gone to their end,
do not exist.
- Lokavipatti Sutta

Stuff I write about things.
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by alan... »

tiltbillings wrote:
alan... wrote:there's that mysterious "ninth jhana" which is itself nibbana.
No, it is not nibbana. There are those monks who are not jhana masters who attained nibbana but could not attain the 9th. The 9th is something that those who have attained nibbana can attain.
oh i wasn't saying that's the only way to nibbana. it just is mentioned as one way, or so i thought.

EDIT: looking at it now i see that it is usually believed to be as you said, only accessible to those who have already made attainments, although i don't see where it says this verbatim in a sutta (such as "he enters the cessation of perception... this is only accessible to those who have already attained the way..." or something like that), nanamoli says it in "life of the buddha" and it's on accesstoinsight as well, so you were dead on. is there a place where it says this in a sutta? all i'm finding is where he lists it as an attainment but doesn't specify who can get there.
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by tiltbillings »

alan... wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:You might start with the image of the Buddha, and if you are able to produce a radiant vision of the Buddha, you can move on to Vishnu or Zeus, and that sort of thing.
any progress in the dhamma to be made with such things? that's one place i'm kind of at a loss, what do i do with my jhana concentration? i've read a couple of suggestions, such as tracing thoughts to their source, which works wonderfully as you see there is none, they are dependently arisen, but now what?
Tracing your thoughts to the source is a conceptual practice, which has its value, but it also has its limitations.

As for playing with jhanas, other than being a fun thing to do, it can teach you about the nature of the experience so one might get lost in it, but I am not recommending that you or anyone else do this. I am saying that it is possible.

What do with jhana concentration? Listen to http://dharmaseed.org/teacher/96/?search=jhanas" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and work from there.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by alan... »

tiltbillings wrote:
alan... wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:You might start with the image of the Buddha, and if you are able to produce a radiant vision of the Buddha, you can move on to Vishnu or Zeus, and that sort of thing.
any progress in the dhamma to be made with such things? that's one place i'm kind of at a loss, what do i do with my jhana concentration? i've read a couple of suggestions, such as tracing thoughts to their source, which works wonderfully as you see there is none, they are dependently arisen, but now what?
Tracing your thoughts to the source is a conceptual practice, which has its value, but it also has its limitations.

As for playing with jhanas, other than being a fun thing to do, it can teach you about the nature of the experience so one might get lost in it, but I am not recommending that you or anyone else do this. I am saying that it is possible.

What do with jhana concentration? Listen to http://dharmaseed.org/teacher/96/?search=jhanas" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and work from there.
thanks!
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: jhana pre buddhist, hinduism today and so on.

Post by Cittasanto »

tiltbillings wrote:
alan... wrote:there's that mysterious "ninth jhana" which is itself nibbana.
No, it is not nibbana. There are those monks who are not jhana masters who attained nibbana but could not attain the 9th. The 9th is something that those who have attained nibbana can attain.
The minimum level of Jhana an Arahant has is the first.
Full mastery of all the Jhanas is not essential but the ability to enter into jhana is.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
Post Reply