What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

An open and inclusive investigation into Buddhism and spiritual cultivation

What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby kmath » Fri Oct 25, 2013 9:41 pm

Did he mean that certain experiences are suffering or that existence itself is suffering?

Here's one way to think about it: Let's suppose the human realm and the "four lower realms of woe" do not exist. And say the all the realms "above" the human realm do exist. So rebirth would always take place in a "higher" realm. Would the Buddha still teach?
User avatar
kmath
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby Bhikkhu Pesala » Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:46 pm

kmath wrote:Did he mean that certain experiences are suffering or that existence itself is suffering?

He meant that existence itself is unsatisfactory (dukkha). We should not say that being reborn in the celestial or brahma realms is suffering in the normally accepted sense of that term. Nor should we say that human happiness is suffering.

If getting sick is suffering, then recovering and being healthy is happiness.
If not getting what you want is suffering, then getting it is happiness.
If being blamed is suffering, then being praised is happiness, etc.

Nevertheless, dukkha is inevitable because whatever sensual, intellectual, or spiritual happiness we gain,it is still conditioned, and therefore impermanent and unsatisfactory (dukkha).

Only nibbāna is free from all dukkha.
AIM WebsitePāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
 
Posts: 2013
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby cooran » Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:49 pm

Hello kmath,

The Noble Truth of Suffering - Dukkha
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dham ... index.html

With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
cooran
 
Posts: 7531
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby Modus.Ponens » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:25 pm

Thank you Bhante. :anjali:
And the Blessed One addressed the bhikkhus, saying: "Behold now, bhikkhus, I exhort you: All compounded things are subject to vanish. Strive with earnestness!"
User avatar
Modus.Ponens
 
Posts: 1982
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:38 am
Location: Funchal, Portugal

Re: What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby manas » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:48 pm

kmath wrote:Did he mean that certain experiences are suffering or that existence itself is suffering?

Here's one way to think about it: Let's suppose the human realm and the "four lower realms of woe" do not exist. And say the all the realms "above" the human realm do exist. So rebirth would always take place in a "higher" realm. Would the Buddha still teach?


If you were in a celestial realm, and you had a wonderful and glorious life with a goddess you truly loved, who satisfied you in every way, but then still had to die one day - as even devas eventually have to die, and reappear elsewhere - then I think you would still suffer, from leaving behind such a happy life, that you had become identified with as 'me' and as 'mine'. imho. I've heard that even heavenly beings end up crying and suffering - unless they have the insight that only the Dhamma can give. :anjali:
User avatar
manas
 
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby kmath » Sat Oct 26, 2013 5:17 am

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:
kmath wrote:Did he mean that certain experiences are suffering or that existence itself is suffering?

He meant that existence itself is unsatisfactory (dukkha). We should not say that being reborn in the celestial or brahma realms is suffering in the normally accepted sense of that term. Nor should we say that human happiness is suffering.

If getting sick is suffering, then recovering and being healthy is happiness.
If not getting what you want is suffering, then getting it is happiness.
If being blamed is suffering, then being praised is happiness, etc.

Nevertheless, dukkha is inevitable because whatever sensual, intellectual, or spiritual happiness we gain,it is still conditioned, and therefore impermanent and unsatisfactory (dukkha).

Only nibbāna is free from all dukkha.


Well put. Thank you!

:thanks:

:anjali:
User avatar
kmath
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby Dhammanando » Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:50 am

kmath wrote:Let's suppose the human realm and the "four lower realms of woe" do not exist. And say the all the realms "above" the human realm do exist. So rebirth would always take place in a "higher" realm. Would the Buddha still teach?


The absence of the lower realms and the human realm would impose a rather drastic limit on how much dukkha-dukkhatā could be experienced, though vipariṇāma-dukkhatā and saṅkhāra-dukkhatā would remain wholly intact. In such a universe I believe the Buddha would still teach, that is, he would still declare the preferability of bhavanirodha over bhava. On the other hand, I suspect the paucity of dukkha-dukkhatā would mean his following being a great deal smaller than it is in our own universe.
    ...and this thought arose in the mind of the Blessed One:
    “Who lives without reverence lives miserably.”
    Uruvela Sutta, A.ii.20

    It were endless to dispute upon everything that is disputable.
    — William Penn Some Fruits of Solitude,
User avatar
Dhammanando
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Wat Pa Mieng Khun Pang, Chiang Mai

Re: What exactly was the Buddha's teaching on suffering?

Postby SamBodhi » Sat Oct 26, 2013 5:33 pm

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Nevertheless, dukkha is inevitable because whatever sensual, intellectual, or spiritual happiness we gain,it is still conditioned, and therefore impermanent and unsatisfactory (dukkha).
Only nibbāna is free from all dukkha.

Thank you very much Bhante. I was also curious about a good way to say this.


with Metta,
SamBodhi
"An inward-staying
unentangled knowing,
All outward-going knowing
cast aside."
--Upasika Kee Nanayon
SamBodhi
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:38 pm


Return to Open Dhamma

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: appicchato, martinfrank and 10 guests