Then why the word "ordained?"oceanmen wrote:not a monk....i wish!!
Then why the word "ordained?"oceanmen wrote:not a monk....i wish!!
tiltbillings wrote:Ordained? You are a monk?oceanmen wrote:Kim O'Hara wrote:I came back to reply to Tilt's question about apologies but the discussion has moved on far beyond that, so I'll do something more appropriate and make a request to those who are arguing the merits of Islam vs Buddhism: please re-read the last ten (or so) posts, mentally swapping Mohammed/Islam/Arabic for Buddha/Buddhism/Pali and vice versa, and ponder the result before posting again.
![]()
Kim
thank you
@titl: i m not Baha'i - born Muslim and ordained Buddhist (which does not make me less Muslim/Buddhist)Not really. It is taking the ego too seriously that is the problem.our greatest enemy is our Ego
tiltbillings wrote:Then why the word "ordained?"oceanmen wrote:not a monk....i wish!!
Humility can be quite self-deceptive, just as can be sincerity.oceanmen wrote:
if you take the Ego too seriously does that mean you take humility too lightly?
Not really. Generally ordained suggest becoming a monk. Going for refuge (most commonly mistranslated as taking refuge) is what is used for laity.oceanmen wrote:tiltbillings wrote:Then why the word "ordained?"oceanmen wrote:not a monk....i wish!!
.....i thought its applicable for non monks as well....
tiltbillings wrote:Humility can be quite self-deceptive, just as can be sincerity.oceanmen wrote:
if you take the Ego too seriously does that mean you take humility too lightly?
No. Nothing so complicated. We human beings just have a great capacity for self-deception.oceanmen wrote:tiltbillings wrote:Humility can be quite self-deceptive, just as can be sincerity.oceanmen wrote:
if you take the Ego too seriously does that mean you take humility too lightly?
equinimity between ego and humility or regarding the illusion in them is what u mean?
Rather that saying one must read the Koran in Arabic to understand; it would be far better to say: "It is what Muslims believe that to truly understand the Koran. . . .
Do you understand my point here about the differences between to the two statements? Might you not wonder about the differences in the responses elicited between the two?oceanmen wrote:Rather that saying one must read the Koran in Arabic to understand; it would be far better to say: "It is what Muslims believe that to truly understand the Koran. . . .
do you have the Buddhist sutta of not believing anything unless u do proper investigation?
tiltbillings wrote:Do you understand my point here about the differences between to the two statements? Might you not wonder about the differences in the responses elicited between the two?oceanmen wrote:Rather that saying one must read the Koran in Arabic to understand; it would be far better to say: "It is what Muslims believe that to truly understand the Koran. . . .
do you have the Buddhist sutta of not believing anything unless u do proper investigation?
oceanmen wrote:
i understand and i agree...hope its likewise...!!
Mawkish1983 wrote:Hmmm, I've often noticed people leave out the "praised by the wise" bit when misquoting the Kalama Sutta, if that's what you're refering to Oceanmen.

'Narrated Aisha: The Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old Sahih al-Bukhari, 7:62:64
oceanmen wrote:please elaborate
oceanmen wrote:do you have the Buddhist sutta of not believing anything unless u do proper investigation?
I don't think there are any evil people, just people who choose to do evil deeds.Laurens wrote:twisted and evil individual
Mawkish1983 wrote:I don't think there are any evil people, just people who choose to do evil deeds.Laurens wrote:twisted and evil individual
Laurens wrote:I don't think much of Muhammed. I wonder how people rationalize worshipping a paedophile?'Narrated Aisha: The Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old Sahih al-Bukhari, 7:62:64
A guy who had sexual relations with a 9 year old girl.
Doesn't sound like a Buddha.... This is but why example of why it would be reasonable to consider Muhammed a twisted and evil individual...
Okay, well the point I was making is that Muhammed was not exactly a peaceful and "Buddhist" individual. He is claimed to have beheaded 600 - 900 in Banu Qurayza for example. There are no Buddhist scriptures proclaiming the murderous acts of Gotama.
Its a popular misconception that Islam is founded upon peace. Whilst there are undoubtedly peaceful Muslims - they are unfortunately somewhat unorthodox.
Muhammed was not exactly a peaceful and "Buddhist" individual.

Mawkish1983 wrote:oceanmen wrote:please elaborate
With reference to...oceanmen wrote:do you have the Buddhist sutta of not believing anything unless u do proper investigation?
I think you are thinking of the Kalama Sutta. Search on Accesstoinsight for it

Registered users: Alex123, barcsimalsi, Ben, Bing [Bot], binocular, BuddhaSoup, Coyote, Dan74, dannyj, diptych4, felipe, Google [Bot], Kim O'Hara, michael_dorfman, mikenz66, palchi, puppha, purple planet, Sam Vara, STM, Zenainder