jcsuperstar wrote:you never know when kamma may ripen
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings,jcsuperstar wrote:you never know when kamma may ripen
Sounds like a thinly-veiled threat from a Buddhist gangster film.![]()
Metta,
Retro.

being5 wrote:What possibilities might exist for positive kamma if the life following this one is as, say, a cockroach or a tapeworm or a jellyfish or a tiger or ... etc.
I can't see any.
Does it mean that being born "lower" than a human birth that from there on it's all backwards, away from nibbana (or, at best, no closer)?
Laurens wrote:it's all about this life, don't spend it worrying about what may have happened in a previous life (assuming there is such a thing) or what might happen in the next life...
Focus on this life, its the only one you can be 100% certain of having
Ben wrote: The way I look at it is that we should be focused on attaining (at least) sotapatti in this life.
Laurens wrote: Focus on this life, its the only one you can be 100% certain of having
Peter wrote:It seems you are assuming the cause for where you are born in the next life must come from this life, that each life determines the very next one.
being5 wrote:Good advice but I must be practicing wrongly, or something. My efforts at practice have resulted in feelings of isolation, anxiety and being trapped in some cosmic game of chance. Then comes, not equanimity, but a desire to be rid of those feelings.
"There are these four unconjecturables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them. Which four?
"The Buddha-range of the Buddhas is an unconjecturable that is not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about it.
"The jhana-range of a person in jhana...
"The [precise working out of the] results of kamma...
"Conjecture about [the origin, etc., of] the world is an unconjecturable that is not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about it.
"These are the four unconjecturables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them."
being5 wrote:Ben wrote: The way I look at it is that we should be focused on attaining (at least) sotapatti in this life.
I can't honestly believe that I, personally, have even the remotest chance of achieving stream entry in this present lifetime. I feel mocked by the idea. (Not by you, of course, but by the idea - that it is possible for me).
being5 wrote:Ben wrote: The way I look at it is that we should be focused on attaining (at least) sotapatti in this life.
I can't honestly believe that I, personally, have even the remotest chance of achieving stream entry in this present lifetime. I feel mocked by the idea. (Not by you, of course, but by the idea - that it is possible for me).
being5 wrote:Laurens wrote: Focus on this life, its the only one you can be 100% certain of having
Good advice but I must be practicing wrongly, or something. My efforts at practice have resulted in feelings of isolation, anxiety and being trapped in some cosmic game of chance. Then comes, not equanimity, but a desire to be rid of those feelings.
Registered users: Aware, Ben, Bhikkhu Pesala, Billymac29, Bing [Bot], Digity, diptych4, dxm_dxm, Google [Bot], Kim O'Hara, Modus.Ponens, Mr Man, onaquest, palchi, purple planet, reflection, Sekha, upekha, Zenainder