What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?

Where members are free to take ideas from the Theravāda Canon out of the Theravāda framework. Here you can question rebirth, kamma (and other contentious issues) as well as examine Theravāda's connection to other paths
User avatar
Spiny Norman
Posts: 4010
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Spam, wonderful spam

What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?

Postby Spiny Norman » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:17 am

What exactly do you think it was? The way I read it, Satis error was thinking that consciousness is a permanent entity which continues. Your thoughts?

P
"My religion is very simple - my religion is ice-cream."
Dairy Lama

User avatar
Paul Davy
Posts: 15997
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?

Postby Paul Davy » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:21 am

Greetings Porpoise,

Yes, that was Sati's error.

Metta,
Retro. :)
“I hope, Anuruddha, that you are all living in concord, with mutual appreciation, without disputing, blending like milk and water, viewing each other with kindly eyes.” (MN 31)

What is the final conviction that comes when radical attention is razor-edge sharp? That the object of the mind is mind-made (manomaya). (Ven. Ñāṇananda)

"If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labeled a radical 50 years ago, a liberal 25 years ago and a racist today." (Thomas Sowell)


Return to “Fringe Theravāda Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine