What exactly do you think it was? The way I read it, Satis error was thinking that consciousness is a permanent entity which continues. Your thoughts?
P
A Buddhist discussion forum on the Dhamma of the Theravada
What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?
by Spiny Norman » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:17 am
-
Spiny Norman - Posts: 894
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
Re: What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?
by retrofuturist » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:21 am
Greetings Porpoise,
Yes, that was Sati's error.
Metta,
Retro.
Yes, that was Sati's error.
Metta,
Retro.
If you have asked me of the origination of unease, then I shall explain it to you in accordance with my understanding:
Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)
'We should not congratulate someone on the success of their misdeeds, but on the contrary should endeavour to advise him or her to lead a more skilful and wholesome life. If such advice is ignored then we can only give up and let go' - Phra Panyapatipo
Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum)
Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)
'We should not congratulate someone on the success of their misdeeds, but on the contrary should endeavour to advise him or her to lead a more skilful and wholesome life. If such advice is ignored then we can only give up and let go' - Phra Panyapatipo
Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum)
-
retrofuturist - Posts: 13633
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Registered users: Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], binocular, cherrytigerbarb, Crazy cloud, Google [Bot], khlawng, Kim O'Hara, mikenz66, purple planet, rahul3bds, retrofuturist, Vern Stevens