What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?

An open and inclusive investigation into Buddhism and spiritual cultivation
User avatar
Spiny Norman
Posts: 3899
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Spam, wonderful spam

What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?

Postby Spiny Norman » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:17 am

What exactly do you think it was? The way I read it, Satis error was thinking that consciousness is a permanent entity which continues. Your thoughts?

"I ride tandem with the random, Things don't run the way I planned them, In the humdrum."
Peter Gabriel lyric

User avatar
Paul Davy
Posts: 15852
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: What exactly was Sati's error in MN38?

Postby Paul Davy » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:21 am

Greetings Porpoise,

Yes, that was Sati's error.

Retro. :)
“I hope, Anuruddha, that you are all living in concord, with mutual appreciation, without disputing, blending like milk and water, viewing each other with kindly eyes.” (MN 31)

What is the final conviction that comes when radical attention is razor-edge sharp? That the object of the mind is mind-made (manomaya). (Ven. Ñāṇananda)

Dharma Paths Practice Community (Buddhist practitioners supporting Buddhist practitioners)

Return to “Open Dhamma”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine