A forum for members who wish to develop a deeper understanding of the Pali Canon and associated Commentaries, which for discussion purposes are both treated as authoritative.
Moderator: Mahavihara moderator
by bodom » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:51 pm
So is it considered part of the canon or not? I have seen conflicting answers. Is there a general consensus?

I am on extended leave until further notice. Please refer all moderation issues to our other moderators or administrators.
-

bodom
-
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
-
by tiltbillings » Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:04 pm
bodom_bad_boy wrote:So is it considered part of the canon or not? I have seen conflicting answers. Is there a general consensus?

Only in Burma is it included as part of the Canon.
What is the use of his knowledge
pertaining to the number of insects in the whole world?
Rather, inquire into his knowledge of
that which is to be practised by us
-- Dharmakirti
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.
Níl sa saol seo ach ceo
There is naught in this life but mist
Is ní bheimid beo ach seal beag gearr.
And we will not be alive but a short hard time.
-

tiltbillings
-
- Posts: 16720
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
- Location: Turtle Island
by bodom » Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:08 pm
tiltbillings wrote:bodom_bad_boy wrote:So is it considered part of the canon or not? I have seen conflicting answers. Is there a general consensus?

Only in Burma is it included as part of the Canon.
Thank you.

I am on extended leave until further notice. Please refer all moderation issues to our other moderators or administrators.
-

bodom
-
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
-
Return to Classical Theravāda
Who is online
Registered users: Bing [Bot], ck_c, cooran, gavesako, Google [Bot], kmath, mikenz66, Mojo, Raitanator, Sylvester