A forum for members who wish to develop a deeper understanding of the Pali Canon and associated Commentaries, which for discussion purposes are both treated as authoritative.
Moderator: Mahavihara moderator
by dhammapal » Sun May 01, 2011 2:30 pm
Was the commentary wrong and Rahula was actually 11-years-old?
Thanks / dhammapal.
-
dhammapal
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:23 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
by cooran » Sun May 01, 2011 3:40 pm
Hello dhammapal,
Give us links to both references please, with quotations.
with metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
-

cooran
-
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- Location: Queensland, Australia
-
by dhammapal » Mon May 02, 2011 10:33 am
Hi Cooran,
I found it!
NARRATOR TWO. Meanwhile the novice Rahula, now eleven years old, was living under the Elder Sariputta's care at Ambalatthika, near Rajagaha, where the Buddha returned in due course.
FIRST VOICE. Thus I heard....
~ P84 "The Life of the Buddha According to the Pali Canon" by Bhikkhu Nanamoli
Bhikkhu Bodhi referred me to Nanamoli's book here:
http://www.bodhimonastery.net/courses/M ... MN-061.mp3With metta / dhammapal.
-
dhammapal
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:23 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Return to Classical Theravāda
Who is online
Registered users: Aries86, Ben, Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], binocular, Coyote, Crazy cloud, Dan74, Feathers, Google [Bot], inge, Kim O'Hara, maitreya31, rahul3bds