Was Rahula really 7-years-old in Majjhima 61?

A forum for members who wish to develop a deeper understanding of the Pali Canon and associated Commentaries, which for discussion purposes are both treated as authoritative.

Moderator: Mahavihara moderator

Was Rahula really 7-years-old in Majjhima 61?

Postby dhammapal » Sun May 01, 2011 2:30 pm

Was the commentary wrong and Rahula was actually 11-years-old?

Thanks / dhammapal.
dhammapal
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:23 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Was Rahula really 7-years-old in Majjhima 61?

Postby cooran » Sun May 01, 2011 3:40 pm

Hello dhammapal,

Give us links to both references please, with quotations.

with metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
cooran
 
Posts: 7379
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Was Rahula really 7-years-old in Majjhima 61?

Postby dhammapal » Mon May 02, 2011 10:33 am

Hi Cooran,

I found it!
NARRATOR TWO. Meanwhile the novice Rahula, now eleven years old, was living under the Elder Sariputta's care at Ambalatthika, near Rajagaha, where the Buddha returned in due course.
FIRST VOICE. Thus I heard....
~ P84 "The Life of the Buddha According to the Pali Canon" by Bhikkhu Nanamoli

Bhikkhu Bodhi referred me to Nanamoli's book here:
http://www.bodhimonastery.net/courses/M ... MN-061.mp3

With metta / dhammapal.
dhammapal
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:23 am
Location: Sydney, Australia


Return to Classical Theravāda

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests