Explore the ancient language of the Tipitaka and Theravāda commentaries
Moderator: Mahavihara moderator
by Vincenzi » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:29 am
can Pali be considered as simply a phonetically simplified sanskrit.
-

Vincenzi
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:22 am
-
by cooran » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:58 am
Hello Vincenzi,
There is a previous thread on this:
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=3215 And here is an entry from the Encyclopedia Brittanica:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/top ... i-language with metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
-

cooran
-
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
- Location: Queensland, Australia
-
by Vincenzi » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:04 am
thanks, what about buddhist hybrid sanskrit?
it is samskrita not sanskrit... nevermind.
-

Vincenzi
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:22 am
-
by Cittasanto » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:45 am
Vincenzi wrote:thanks, what about buddhist hybrid sanskrit?
it is samskrita not sanskrit... nevermind.
the spelling with an m you are using probably has a dot above or below it, this is often changed to a standard n.
Sangha is sometimes spelt with the dotted m also.
This offering maybe right, or wrong, but it is one, the other, both, or neither!
With Metta
Upāsaka Cittasanto
Blog - Some Suttas Translated.
"Others will misconstrue reality due to their personal perspectives, doggedly holding onto and not easily discarding them; We shall not misconstrue reality due to our own personal perspectives, nor doggedly holding onto them, but will discard them easily. This effacement shall be done."
-

Cittasanto
-
- Posts: 5496
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin (Isle of Man - not part of the UK)
-
Return to Pali
Who is online
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Dan74, felipe, fig tree, Google [Bot], HumbleThinker, Lazy_eye, onaquest, rahul3bds, retrofuturist, thaijeppe