jhāna in plural form?

Explore the ancient language of the Tipitaka and Theravāda commentaries

Moderator: Mahavihara moderator

User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
Posts: 8292
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Contact:

jhāna in plural form?

Postby David N. Snyder » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:08 pm

Okay, so my Pali studies and participation in this sub-forum has really slacked off lately; been too busy.

Does anyone know how you write jhāna in the plural form, in Pali?

Writing it as jhanas with the "s" at the end is just Palinglish (Pali-English made-up hybrid) as far as I know.

User avatar
daverupa
Posts: 4534
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby daverupa » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:13 pm

I think, for example, that jhāyatha is in the second person plural.
    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]

User avatar
piotr
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:33 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1
Location: Khettadesa

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby piotr » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:08 pm

Hi David,

According to Pāli Lookup nom. pl. of jhāna is jhānāmi. But it seems that it is only a theoretical form, because it's not found in any Pāli text as far as I can tell.

And since English langauge "doesn't have cases" isn't it meaningless to use this kind of form?

Jhāyatha is indeed in second person plural, but it's a verb 'to meditate', not a noun.
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...

User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
Posts: 8292
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Contact:

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby David N. Snyder » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:26 pm

Thanks Dave and Piotr!

Sylvester
Posts: 1647
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:57 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby Sylvester » Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:24 am

I've located 2 inflected forms of the plural.

From DN 33's listing of fours, we have "cattāri jhānāni" - 4 jhanas. Since all the other members of the listing of fours are in the nominative case, it appears that jhānāni is the nominative plural for jhāna.

Elsewhere, in AN 4.35, we have "catunnaṃ jhānānaṃ". The case of jhānānaṃ might be either the dative or genitive plural.

User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
Posts: 8292
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Contact:

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby David N. Snyder » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:18 am

Sylvester wrote:From DN 33's listing of fours, we have "cattāri jhānāni" - 4 jhanas.


:thanks:
That sounds like this could be it (for most cases) to refer to all the jhanas. It's sort of funny how we mix languages in common usage and forget about the proper way to refer to a plural noun. It has been so common for multiple jhāna to be referred to as jhānas that you cannot even find it (or not very easily) in the proper plural form; apparently, jhānāni.

Sylvester
Posts: 1647
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:57 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby Sylvester » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:52 am

Hi David

I think jhanas or even jhānas would be an acceptable Anglisization. Even in academic writing, most untranslated Pali terms are expressed and written only in stem form, since the case relations to other nouns would be provided in the English. If we insist on every Pali noun being properly inflected, even in an English document, we will end up with, eg -

jhāna (the lemma), jhānaṁ (nom sg), jhānāni (nom pl), jhānena (inst sg), jhānehi (inst pl, abl pl), jhānā (abl pl), jhānassa (dat sg, gen sg), jhānānaṁ (dat pl, gen pl), jhāne (loc sg), jhānesu (loc pl).

I'm sure some (if not most) of these forms do not even occur in the Canon, since I simply generated them using a declension table.

We really do not need to populate an English document with these forms, since we can simply use English prepositions or English syntax to handle most of the Pali grammatical cases.

User avatar
piotr
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:33 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1
Location: Khettadesa

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby piotr » Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:29 am

Oooops, sorry for the typo, it's indeed jhānāni. And there are few instances of this form in Pāli Tipiṭaka.
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...

User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
Posts: 8292
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Contact:

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby David N. Snyder » Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:51 pm

piotr wrote:Oooops, sorry for the typo, it's indeed jhānāni. And there are few instances of this form in Pāli Tipiṭaka.


Okay, thanks for letting me know that was a typo; then it definitely appears to be jhānāni.

theY
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:07 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Contact:

Re: jhāna in plural form?

Postby theY » Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:22 am

Namo Buddhassa


2 type of plurals-- noun, and verb. Noun plural type relate to your question.

1, ālapana(callig word), and 2 vidhatti same "citta" word. 3-7 vibhatti same "purisa" word.

Blod words are plural. Sorted by vibhatti.

1. Cittaṃ, Cittāni.
ā. Cittā, he citta, he cittā, he cittāni, he cittā.
2. cittaṃ, cittāni, citte.

Theory from Niruttidīpanī 107 : http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/cscd/e0201 ... ml#para107

3. Purisena, Purisehi, purisebhi.
4. Purisassa, Purisānaṃ.
5. purisasmā, purisamhā, Purisā, purisehi, purisebhi.
6. purisassa, purisānaṃ.
7. purisasmiṃ, purisamhi, purise, purisesu.

Theory from Niruttidīpanī 195 : http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/cscd/e0201 ... ml#para195

Example :

(Bold lines are pural.)

Dutiyo paricchedo.

Atha akārantapuṃsakaliṅgo cittasaddo vuccate.


1.

Cittaṃ attano santānaṃ vijānāti

Cittāni attano sattānaṃ vijānanti

Calling.

Bho citta attano santānaṃ vijānāhi

Bho cittāni attano santānaṃ vijānātha

2.

Cittaṃ saññamessanti ye keci janā

Cittāni saññamessanti ye keci

3. Subject of sentence type.

Cittena sabbopi jano nīyyate

Cittehi sabbopi jano nīyyate

3. itself type.

Cittena saṃkilissati mānavo

Cittehi visujjhati kocimānavo

4.

Cittassa ovādaṃ deti koci jano

Cittānaṃ ovādaṃ denti keci janā

5.

Cittasmā ārammaṇaṃ uppajjati

Cittehi ārammaṇāni uppajjanti

6.

Cittassa aniccadhammassa vasamanvagū

Cittānaṃ parivitakko udapādi

7.

Citte arakkhite kāyakammaṃ arakkhitaṃ

Cittesu guttesu kāyakammaṃ rakkhitaṃ.



Iti paṭhamo pāṭho.


http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/cscd/e1211 ... ml#V0.0014

PS. If your question refer to verb type, it should be like "jhā", "jhāyati", "jhāyanti", etc.
Lesson Relationship of Abhidhammatthasaṅgaha (10/31/2012)
http://tipitakanews.org/en/node/61


Return to “Pali”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests