Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Explore the ancient language of the Tipitaka and Theravāda commentaries
blackspaven
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Post by blackspaven »

Ah, thanks for pointing out the 'I'... that might have been embarassing if i'd have put a full stop on the end! :tongue:

Thanks again for all your help, I think I can go ahead with what I wanted to do now.

:namaste:
blackspaven
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Post by blackspaven »

Out of interest, can I assume that there's now right or wrong way for these aspects to be followed in terms of the way they're written down? The way they've been listed so far in this thread is just the way they were written; there's nothing to say if they are to be reproduced in another form that they HAVE to be listed in that specific order? Kinda seems like it would go against the nature of the path itself, but I thought i'd ask.
User avatar
piotr
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Khettadesa

Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Post by piotr »

Kare wrote:I find it strange that no one has suggested this simple answer to the Pali-Magadhi problem. And if I am wrong, at least I would like to see it refuted.
Thanks for your insightful remarks. I think that your solution is plausible.
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...
Post Reply