Gena1480 wrote:any way is the any sutta that explains nonself by itself
thanks in advance.
SN 22.59: Pañcavaggi Sutta wrote:If form were the self, this form would not lend itself to dis-ease. It would be possible [to say] with regard to form, 'Let this form be thus. Let this form not be thus.' But precisely because form is not self, form lends itself to dis-ease. And it is not possible [to say] with regard to form, 'Let this form be thus. Let this form not be thus.
SN 22.59: Pañcavaggi Sutta wrote:"What do you think, monks — Is form constant or inconstant?"
"And is that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?"
"And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to change as: 'This is mine. This is my self. This is what I am'?"
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot], zan and 5 guests