put it into its original context 2500 years ago!
eunuchs weren't eunuchs because of cancer, or surgery for a specific problem then, usually castrated early enough to have hormonal consequences and for a specific purpose such as to guard female royalty, or other social task. sometimes impotent men were called eunuchs although I don't know if that was the case here, and it may of come about because of the function in society, but havn't read the origin story to confirm this.
Annabel wrote:It makes no sense to me why an eunuch shouldn't be allowed to be ordained.
The testicles could be removed due to cancer or an accident, or whatever.
Likewise, if a woman had the uterus removed, can't she become a nun then?
This seems absurd to me.
I thought being ordained means chastity and celibacy anyhow, an asexual life.
So why would it matter??
How come Angulamalas can ordain, and people with sexual organs missing can't ?
That is not logical.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.John Stuart Mill