Thanks Tony...
Undesirable. Applicants falling into the following categories should not be given the Going-forth. As Going-forth is the customary first step in full Acceptance, this means that they should not receive full Acceptance, either. Any bhikkhu who gives any of these applicants the Going-forth incurs a dukkaṭa. However, the applicant does count as having properly gone forth; if fully accepted he is properly accepted and need not be expelled.
<snip>
2-C A debtor. Here the Commentary says that debtor includes one who has inherited debts from his parents or grandparents, as well as one who has incurred debts on his own. If others agree to take on the debts or take over their payment, he may go forth. If Bhikkhu X gives the Going-forth to Y, not knowing that Y has debts but later learning the truth, he should take Y to his creditors if he can get hold of him. If he can't, he is not responsible for the debts. If he feels so inspired, he may undertake to pay off Y's debts if he feels that Y is serious about the practice. But he may not give the Going-forth to Y, knowing of Y's debts beforehand, with the intention of paying them off himself. If he does, he incurs a dukkaṭa.
BMC 2, Chapter 14,
ashtanga wrote:I would like to consider ordaining at some juncture. However, I have some debts that although being managed will never be paid off. What are my options? Bancruptcy?![]()

rowyourboat wrote:I think the issue with debts is that no-one should make the Sangha a refuge from debt (money owed to others). If you file for bankruptcy your debts will be written off. It will be a good act of renunciation to begin with, before you go for the actual one.
rowyourboat wrote:Hi Ashtanga
I think the issue with debts is that no-one should make the Sangha a refuge from debt (money owed to others). If you file for bankruptcy your debts will be written off. It will be a good act of renunciation to begin with, before you go for the actual one.
with metta
Matheesha
cooran wrote:Sorry ryb, but this sounds dishonest, not an act of renunciation at all. I would not like to be a businessman, with all the worries of trying to run a business and pay staff, and have the law such that people could just enter voluntary bankruptcy and wipe what is owed to me and my family away. The same goes on a bigger scale.
And if the time as a bhikkhu doesn't end up being a life-time thing, as very often it doesn't, then the OP would have created huge problems for himself in re-entering lay society.
What Renunciation means is Nekkhamma - you may like to read these selections:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/index-su ... #nekkhamma
Better to save up and do long retreats.
with metta
Chris
with metta
Chris
ashtanga wrote:Not enough assets to cover my debt. I worked in IT for nearly two decades that brought with it plenty of money but also plenty of credit. I then changed several years ago to work in social care. I am a Psychologicalo Therapist now, my current salary is what I used to get for a bonus. I managed my debts but they will never get paid off.
Tony...
Goofaholix wrote:ashtanga wrote:Not enough assets to cover my debt. I worked in IT for nearly two decades that brought with it plenty of money but also plenty of credit. I then changed several years ago to work in social care. I am a Psychologicalo Therapist now, my current salary is what I used to get for a bonus. I managed my debts but they will never get paid off.
Tony...
I think the answer is if you really want to be a monk then go back and work in IT to pay off your debts, if you aren't happy to do that then you probably don't really want to be a monk, being a Psychological Therapist is probably what you want.
Return to Ordination and Monastic Life
Registered users: barcsimalsi, Bing [Bot], fig tree, Google [Bot], MidGe