And this is not true why?legolas wrote:"It should be noted that the clear realization of impermanence is a specific characteristic of the Sammasana-ñana, and it means that the meditator will face many painful sensations."
And this is not true why?legolas wrote:"It should be noted that the clear realization of impermanence is a specific characteristic of the Sammasana-ñana, and it means that the meditator will face many painful sensations."
legolas wrote:However as far as I am aware it is the suttas that take precedence and since even in the suttas these teachings are not mentioned in the 1st council - I was drawing a glaringly obvious conclusion - the Paṭisambhidāmagga was added at a later time.
tiltbillings wrote:And that is one of the direct insights - not just an intellectual construct - that one can see as pain is an object of mindfulness.legolas wrote:Dukkha is not synonyomous with pain.
tiltbillings wrote:And this is not true why?legolas wrote:"It should be noted that the clear realization of impermanence is a specific characteristic of the Sammasana-ñana, and it means that the meditator will face many painful sensations."
Ñāṇa wrote:legolas wrote:However as far as I am aware it is the suttas that take precedence and since even in the suttas these teachings are not mentioned in the 1st council - I was drawing a glaringly obvious conclusion - the Paṭisambhidāmagga was added at a later time.
The underlying structure of the eighteen insight-ñāṇa-s as presented in the Paṭisambhidāmagga can be traced to the suttas. They are termed "contemplation" (anupassanā) and "gnosis of contemplation" (anupassanāñāṇa) in the Paṭisambhidāmagga, and are either termed "recognition" (saññā) or "contemplation" (anupassanā) in the suttas. The most well known sutta source is the fourth tetrad of the Ānāpānassati Sutta: contemplation of impermanence (aniccānupassana), contemplation of dispassion (virāgānupassana), contemplation of cessation (nirodhānupassanā), contemplation of release (paṭinissaggānupassana). Other suttas expand on this structure:AN 10.60 (PTS A v 108): Recognition of impermanence (aniccasaññā)
AN 7.49 (ATI 7.46, PTS A iv 46)
AN 7.95 (PTS A iv 145)
SN 46.71 (PTS S v 132, CDB 1620)
AN 7.49 (ATI 7.46, PTS A iv 46): Recognition of unsatisfactoriness in what is impermanent (anicca dukkhasaññā)
AN 7.96 (PTS A iv 146)
SN 46.72 (PTS S v 132, CDB 1620)
AN 10.60 (PTS A v 108): Recognition of selflessness (anattasaññā)
AN 7.49 (ATI 7.46, PTS A iv 46): Recognition of selflessness in what is unsatisfactory (dukkha anattasaññā)
AN 7.97 (PTS A iv 146)
SN 46.73 (PTS S v 133, CDB 1620)
AN 7.98 (PTS A iv 146): Recognition of decay (khayasaññā)
AN 7.99 (PTS A iv 146): Recognition of passing away (vayasaññā)
AN 10.60 PTS A v 108: Recognition of dispassion (virāgasaññā)
AN 7.100 (PTS A iv 146)
SN 46.75 (PTS S v 133, CDB 1621)
AN 10.60 (PTS A v 108): Recognition of cessation (nirodhasaññā)
AN 7.101 (PTS A iv 146)
SN 46.76 (PTS S v 133, CDB 1621)
AN 7.102 (PTS A iv 146): Recognition of release (paṭinissaggasaññā)
Cf. the eighteen insight-ñāṇa-s as presented in the Paṭisambhidāmagga:(1) contemplation of impermanence (aniccānupassanā), (2) contemplation of unsatisfactoriness (dukkhānupassanā), (3) contemplation of selflessness (anattānupnupassanā), (4) contemplation of disenchantment (nibbidānupassanā), (5) contemplation of dispassion (virāgānupassanā), (6) contemplation of cessation (nirodhānupassanā), (7) contemplation of release (paṭinissaggānupassanāā), (8) contemplation of decay (khayānupassanā), (9) contemplation of passing away (vayānupassanā), (10) contemplation of change (vipariṇāmānupassanā), (11) contemplation of signlessness (animittānupassanā), (12) contemplation of desirelessness (apaṇihitānupassanā), (13) contemplation of emptiness (suññatāupassanā), (14) clear seeing of dhamma with heightened discernment (adhipaññādhammavipassanā), (15) gnosis and vision of things as they are (yathābhūtañāṇadassana), (16) contemplation of misery/danger (ādīnavānupassanā), (17) reflexive contemplation (paṭisaṅkhānupassanā), (18) contemplation of turning away (vivaṭṭanānupassanā).
Thus, the Paṭisambhidāmagga is just an elaboration of suttanta materials. Of course, what the Paṭisambhidāmagga presents is not the same as the Visuddhimagga, which again reformulates these 18 contemplations and interprets phenomena according to the theory of radical momentariness. And it's possible that modern Burmese based interpretations of the insight-gnoses may not fully reflect what is presented in the Visuddhimagga.
All the best,
Geoff
I did not miss your point at all. The issue in what I was saying is that pain, which is inevitable in one's meditation practice, can be a very potent way of seeing the how dukkha and anicca functions.legolas wrote:tiltbillings wrote:And that is one of the direct insights - not just an intellectual construct - that one can see as pain is an object of mindfulness.legolas wrote:Dukkha is not synonyomous with pain.
I think you miss my point. Pain can truly be an object of mindfulness, however pain is not a necessity and seeing the arising of dukkha does not HAVE to entail the arising of pain.
When there is sufficient mindfulness and concentration the pain and agitation can be clearly attended to. Something I posted earlier in a very different context:The whole point of jhana is to be able to see the pointless grasping at constructs that arise and fall of their own accord. The tranquility of body and mind is the perfect place from which to watch this seemingly endless display. To watch this display with a body that is agitated according to the Buddha was not conducive.....................
During a three month vipassana retreat I was suffering from muscle spasms in my back. Very, very painful, and having struggled with it greatly, I went to one of the teachers there, Joseph Goldstein, who said that I should use the pain as the object of awareness. Damn, the obvious is stated, but sometimes being told the obvious is all that needed.
My next chance to sit was during the evening Dharma talk. As usual the pain started as I assumed my sitting posture. I had all I could do to keep from bolting out of the room to get away from the pain of the posture. With no small effort I was able to bring attention to the pain. As the pain became the object of my attention, everything else was blocked out.
Intense, deep concentration. I heard nothing, was aware of nothing going on around me. There was just pain. Once I was able to establish awareness on – in – the pain, I was able to relax into it. The mindfulness became clear and very precise.
The pain which had been a solid rock like thing became a play of sensation changing at an incredible rate, and the closer I attended to the change the clearer it became. There was no thinking about this, just attending to what was happening. As the muscles spasmed, sending out a paroxysm of pain, there was contracting from the pain – it was not as I wanted it to be - I was suffering.
As the attention become more precise, the pain and suffering were seen as separate but inter-related things, the "I" was an add-on to the pain giving it the sense of suffering and the contracting from that – I do not want this pain.
In the simple act of attending to the pain, this whole dynamic concatenation became clear and obvious, and with that insight the next spasm was not painful. It was, rather, a play of very, very rapidly changing sensations that was empty of a sense of "I". It was even empty of the sense of the concept of pain. The sense of "I" that arose was changing in response the changing conditions, and it, in its arising and changing, was seen as empty of any solidity.
With that there was no resistance, no more contraction. There came a remarkable relaxation of my body, and my attention became very broad and open, attentive to the rise and fall of whatever came into its purview.
The limitations of my body became transparent, there being no inside, no outside. It was all very ordinary: there was the Dharma talk that was happening, the coughing, shuffling of the other students, and the stuff happening "inside" of me. All just stuff happening with incredible rapidity and incredible clarity. It just was, empty, clear rising and falling. Suchness. Openness.
legolas wrote:I looked up a few of your sutta references and I am sorry but I do not see the correlation to the eighteen insight knowledges.
tiltbillings wrote:robertk wrote:It is as authentic as the Abhidhamma Pitaka texts.Or are you only referring to the authenticty of the Patisam...?
legolas wrote:Hi Tilt,
I can relate to similar experiences of mine to that which you detail above.
However I really do think you are still missing my point, which is ..............pain is not inevitable - it is highly likely. Pain is NOT an actual necessary or integral part of the awakening process as portrayed in the suttas, whilst it is an integral stage as it is portrayed in the nana's.
Alex123 wrote:The stages of purification of insight are mentioned in the suttas such as MN24
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
And in DN34 (or 33).
Furthermore it is quite possible that one the way to insight, there will be painful and uncomfortable sensations. These are just preliminary stages.
Nobody said that the path is always easy and blissful:
"And who is the individual who goes against the flow? There is the case where an individual doesn't indulge in sensual passions and doesn't do evil deeds. Even though it may be with pain, even though it may be with sorrow, even though he may be crying, his face in tears, he lives the holy life that is perfect & pure. This is called the individual who goes against the flow.
...
Thus the enlightened one, with mindfulness here established, not indulging in sensuality & evil, though it may be with pain, would abandon sensuality. They call him one who goes against the flow.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
My question would be apart from MN24 are there any suttas that detail the stages of purification?legolas wrote:My question would be apart from MN24 are there any suttas that detail the stages of purification?
Furthermore, he remains focused on feelings... mind... mental
qualities in & of themselves — ardent, alert, & mindful — putting
aside greed & distress with reference to the world. As he remains
thus focused on mental qualities in & of themselves, a fever based on
mental qualities arises within his body,
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .olen.html
37. "So teaching, so proclaiming, O monks, I have been baselessly, vainly, falsely and wrongly accused by some ascetics and brahmans: 'A nihilist[38] is the ascetic Gotama; He teaches the annihilation, the destruction, the non-being of an existing individual.'[39]
"As I am not as I do not teach, so have I been baselessly, vainly, falsely and wrongly accused by some ascetics and brahmans thus: 'A nihilist is the ascetic Gotama; He teaches the annihilation, the destruction, the non-being of an existing individual.'
"What I teach now as before, O monks, is suffering and the cessation of suffering.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .nypo.html
Moggallana, as he later said, attained sainthood by quick penetration (khippabhiñña), that is, in one week but his progress was difficult (dukkha-patipada) [I would translate this path via suffering- there was nothing difficult- he attained nibbana in two weeks], requiring the helpful prompting(sa-sankhara) of the Master. Sariputta, too, attained sainthood by quick penetration (in two weeks), but his progress was smooth (sukha-patipada); see Anguttara IV, 167-168).
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... el263.html
"Seeing thus, the well-instructed disciple of the noble ones grows disenchanted [some translate ‘nibbida’ as revulsion] with form, disenchanted with feeling, disenchanted with perception, disenchanted with fabrications, disenchanted with consciousness. Disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate. Through dispassion, he is fully released.
I have made that point:legolas wrote:However I really do think you are still missing my point, which is ..............pain is not inevitable - it is highly likely.
Maybe, but it is not likely one is not going to experience mental or physical pain throughout one's life. You don't practice when your sick or hurting? You don't practice when you are distressed? Then you are not practicing.Pain is NOT an actual necessary or integral part of the awakening process as portrayed in the suttas, whilst it is an integral stage as it is portrayed in the nana's.
Quite so.Ñāṇa wrote: But having done numerous intensive retreats (up to 6 mo. in duration), my experience has been that intensive practice can run the full spectrum from times of elation and joy and gratitude to those of deep sadness, fear, boredom, and even physical pain. Over the years these extremes do begin to even out, but I doubt that anyone can intensively engage in this process without experiencing discomfort on various levels and shedding a few tears along the way.
Pretty much.robert wrote:tiltbillings wrote:It is as authentic as the Abhidhamma Pitaka texts.robertk wrote:
Of course, it is part of the Tipitika.
Please point to the passages in these two links that you are refering to:robertk wrote:legolas wrote:Hi Tilt,
I can relate to similar experiences of mine to that which you detail above.
However I really do think you are still missing my point, which is ..............pain is not inevitable - it is highly likely. Pain is NOT an actual necessary or integral part of the awakening process as portrayed in the suttas, whilst it is an integral stage as it is portrayed in the nana's.
Do you have any citation from any Commentary saying that pain is an integral part, or a station on the way to nibbana?
That is nice, but obviously is not what I referring to, and I rather doubt that the two linkslegolas wrote:Hi Tilt,
I wish to make an amendment to my earlier post. There ARE practices that will inevitably lead to pain. . . .The practices described above and others do lead INEVITABLY to pain - these practices were rejected by the Buddha.
Return to Theravada Meditation
Registered users: Bing [Bot], ck_c, cooran, Exabot [Bot], gavesako, Google [Bot], kmath, lantohsay, mikenz66, Mojo, Raitanator, robertk, Sylvester