I'd feed a starving child before a healthy arahant

General discussion of issues related to Theravada Training of Sila, the Five Precepts (Pañcasikkhāpada), and Eightfold Ethical Conduct (Aṭṭhasīla).

I'd feed a starving child before a healthy arahant

Postby manas » Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:09 pm

Sorry if my post offends, but I just wanted to point out an issue in Buddhism, and some other religions, that I find a little disturbing. It is the idea of 'making merit' for oneself, by 'doing good works'. It sounds just a little calculating and self-serving to me. If I have an apple in my hand, and before me I see a starving beggar child, and a plump arahant on alms round, I will give the apple to the starving beggar child, yes even if that means I miss out on a million 'merit points' and a thousand years of feasting in Heaven. Give where there is the greatest need, not where it will make things better for oneself. And on the side of 'demerit' - the reason I don't kill little bugs, isn't because I would would incur a reaction for doing so; the reason I don't kill them, is because I feel for them, I have empathy for these little creatures. Same with human beings. How sad that some folks actually need to be threatened with pain and suffering, so that they restrain themselves from inflicting it on others.
Last edited by manas on Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
manas
 
Posts: 2129
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby David N. Snyder » Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:15 pm

Image

So you want a Buddhism without cultural accretions? Nothing wrong with that.
User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8107
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby m0rl0ck » Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:19 pm

manas wrote:Sorry if my post offends, but I just wanted to point out an issue in Buddhism, and some other religions, that I find a little disturbing. It is the idea of 'making merit' for oneself, by 'doing good works'. It sounds just a little calculating and self-serving to me. If I have an apple in my hand, and before me I see a starving beggar child, and a plump arahant on alms round, I will give the apple to the starving beggar child, yes even if that means I miss out on a million 'merit points' and a thousand years of feasting in Heaven.


I would do the same. But if i had two apples i would first give one to the arahant to see if he gave it to the child.
Ok wait a minute. If an arahant is plump, isnt he doing it wrong?
There is no comfort without pain; thus
we define salvation through suffering.
-- Cato
User avatar
m0rl0ck
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:51 am

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby mikenz66 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:50 pm

manas wrote:It is the idea of 'making merit' for oneself, by 'doing good works'. It sounds just a little calculating and self-serving to me.

I agree, and I so not think that such a calculating approach is what the teachings are pointing to.

There are many suttas on generosity: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/index-subject.html#dana
One that might be relevant to the current discussion is:
AN 9.20 Velāma Sutta
Is it actually saying that we should feed a plump arahant ahead of a starving child?

:anjali:
Mike
User avatar
mikenz66
 
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby mikenz66 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:14 pm

Here is a useful thread: http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.ph ... 346#p18278

I recall another discussion the Ven Dhammando about this issue but I can't locate it right now.

:anjali:
Mike
User avatar
mikenz66
 
Posts: 10374
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby Kim OHara » Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:23 pm

m0rl0ck wrote: If an arahant is plump, isnt he doing it wrong?

That was more or less my thought, too.

:namaste:
Kim
User avatar
Kim OHara
 
Posts: 3064
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby Dhammanando » Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:07 pm

manas wrote:And on the side of 'demerit' - the reason I don't kill little bugs, isn't because I would would incur a reaction for doing so; the reason I don't kill them, is because I feel for them, I have empathy for these little creatures. Same with human beings. How sad that some folks actually need to be threatened with pain and suffering, so that they restrain themselves from inflicting it on others.


To keep one’s precepts merely out of a prudential wish to avoid unpleasant vipākas no doubt bespeaks of an inferior level of motivation, but don't you think it's better than not being motivated towards sīla at all? And I doubt the unkilled bugs would find it in the least sad.
    ...and this thought arose in the mind of the Blessed One:
    “Who lives without reverence lives miserably.”
    Uruvela Sutta, A.ii.20

    It were endless to dispute upon everything that is disputable.
    — William Penn Some Fruits of Solitude,
User avatar
Dhammanando
 
Posts: 1266
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Wat Pa Mieng Khun Pang, Chiang Mai

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby Ben » Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:39 pm

Hi Manas,

I think the idea is to give selflessly, objectively without consideration as to the benefit to oneself and without consideration where is the greatest good to be served.
kind regards,

Ben
"One cannot step twice into the same river, nor can one grasp any mortal substance in a stable condition, but it scatters and again gathers; it forms and dissolves, and approaches and departs."

- Hereclitus


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 16127
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby Sekha » Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:51 pm

manas wrote:Give where there is the greatest need, not where it will make things better for oneself.

The greatest need in the world right now is to keep the sasana alive and healthy, because it will benefit humanity and all living beings much more than anything else. It is because the benefit for the world as whole is maximum when one contributes to the prolongation of the sasana, that in turn the benefit for the giver is maximum, provided he is truly motivated by altruism. In other words, it is always better to help an arahant (if he truly is one and we're being really helpful) than helping anyone else, not for one's own sake but for the world.

More generally speaking, it is always better to help beings who have a higher sense of morality because they will in turn take advantage of the help we have provided them to help others. On the contrary, if I save the life of a serial killer and he goes on killing more people, I will gather less merit and impact the world less positively than if I save the life of a surgeon who is going to save the life of many people. The same if I give money to a beggar who is going to do no better than getting more drunk with it. Or if I give money to a monk, or even offer requisites to immoral monks.

Once again, self-merit is gathered through "helping" the world as a whole, so it does make sense to choose one's gift's recipient carefully. That said, we should always try to be responsive to those who are in need and ask for help, no matter who they are.
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org
User avatar
Sekha
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: French Guiana

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby SDC » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:24 am

m0rl0ck wrote:Ok wait a minute. If an arahant is plump, isnt he doing it wrong?


Yes!

You'll NEVER see a plump arahant. Ever. Unless of course it's due to a medical condition they have no control over.

Sorry, manas, for somewhat disregarding your main point.
User avatar
SDC
 
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:08 pm
Location: North Jersey

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby Sekha » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:44 am

SDC wrote:You'll NEVER see a plump arahant. Ever. Unless of course it's due to a medical condition they have no control over.

And in virtue of what?
Where knowledge ends, religion begins. - B. Disraeli

http://www.buddha-vacana.org
User avatar
Sekha
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:32 am
Location: French Guiana

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby David N. Snyder » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:31 am

I think the OP was getting at something like what we often see here:
http://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2013/08/u ... hamma.html

where it is used for gaining some merit or for some advantageous position, better health, etc. But with the important qualifier of the intention of the motivation and being self-less as Bhante and others have mentioned above, then it would be done the right way without a reward and punishment system.

Sekha wrote:
SDC wrote:You'll NEVER see a plump arahant. Ever. Unless of course it's due to a medical condition they have no control over.

And in virtue of what?


A non-returner and higher has completely eliminated all sense cravings, so we would assume no longer has any food cravings, no longer overeats (if he/she did before).
User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8107
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby clw_uk » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:34 am

The greatest need in the world right now is to keep the sasana alive and healthy, because it will benefit humanity and all living beings much more than anything else. It is because the benefit for the world as whole is maximum when one contributes to the prolongation of the sasana, that in turn the benefit for the giver is maximum, provided he is truly motivated by altruism. In other words, it is always better to help an arahant (if he truly is one and we're being really helpful) than helping anyone else, not for one's own sake but for the world.


But you need a humanity to be there, I.e. fed, in order to be "saved"
“ Your mind is likewise blocked. But the right road awaits you still. Cast out your doubts, your fears and your desires, let go of grief and of hope as well, for where these rule , then the mind is their subject." Boetius
User avatar
clw_uk
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am
Location: Wales, United Kingdom

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby clw_uk » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:36 am

More generally speaking, it is always better to help beings who have a higher sense of morality because they will in turn take advantage of the help we have provided them to help others. On the contrary, if I save the life of a serial killer and he goes on killing more people, I will gather less merit and impact the world less positively than if I save the life of a surgeon who is going to save the life of many people. The same if I give money to a beggar who is going to do no better than getting more drunk with it. Or if I give money to a monk, or even offer requisites to immoral monks.



First of all you haven't defined morality

Secondly Buddhist ethics rests on the intention, not the outcome, of an action

So you reasoning is baseless because of my first point, and invalid in Buddhist terms because of my second point.
“ Your mind is likewise blocked. But the right road awaits you still. Cast out your doubts, your fears and your desires, let go of grief and of hope as well, for where these rule , then the mind is their subject." Boetius
User avatar
clw_uk
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am
Location: Wales, United Kingdom

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby clw_uk » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:39 am

Once again, self-merit is gathered through "helping" the world as a whole, so it does make sense to choose one's gift's recipient carefully. That said, we should always try to be responsive to those who are in need and ask for help, no matter who they are.


A nice footnote to a post that seems to glorify a transaction based morality

I do X because it gives me maximum return. :shrug:
“ Your mind is likewise blocked. But the right road awaits you still. Cast out your doubts, your fears and your desires, let go of grief and of hope as well, for where these rule , then the mind is their subject." Boetius
User avatar
clw_uk
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am
Location: Wales, United Kingdom

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby clw_uk » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:42 am

To keep one’s precepts merely out of a prudential wish to avoid unpleasant vipākas no doubt bespeaks of an inferior level of motivation, but don't you think it's better than not being motivated towards sīla at all? And I doubt the unkilled bugs would find it in the least sad.


As always that depends on the circumstances.
“ Your mind is likewise blocked. But the right road awaits you still. Cast out your doubts, your fears and your desires, let go of grief and of hope as well, for where these rule , then the mind is their subject." Boetius
User avatar
clw_uk
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am
Location: Wales, United Kingdom

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby clw_uk » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:44 am

Kim OHara wrote:
m0rl0ck wrote: If an arahant is plump, isnt he doing it wrong?

That was more or less my thought, too.

:namaste:
Kim



Not if its because of genetics


Or because all his alms are lumps of lard ...
Last edited by clw_uk on Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
“ Your mind is likewise blocked. But the right road awaits you still. Cast out your doubts, your fears and your desires, let go of grief and of hope as well, for where these rule , then the mind is their subject." Boetius
User avatar
clw_uk
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am
Location: Wales, United Kingdom

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby santa100 » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:45 am

manas wrote:If I have an apple in my hand, and before me I see a starving beggar child, and a plump arahant on alms round..


Ok, plumb or not plumb, the key antecedent assumed that it's a real arahant and all 3 people are within viewable distance to one another. With that in mind, you can still go ahead and give your only apple to the arahant knowing that s/he with the selfless virtue of a true arahant will in turn give it to the starving beggar child. You'd still gain a million 'merit points' and at the same time the starving child would still be saved. Problem solved. Sorry if it sounded a bit too...calculating.. :tongue:
santa100
 
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:55 pm

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby clw_uk » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:47 am

santa100 wrote:
manas wrote:If I have an apple in my hand, and before me I see a starving beggar child, and a plump arahant on alms round..


Ok, plumb or not plumb, the key antecedent assumed that it's a real arahant and all 3 people are within viewable distance to one another. With that in mind, you can still go ahead and give your only apple to the arahant knowing that s/he with the selfless virtue of a true arahant will in turn give it to the starving beggar child. You'd still gain a million 'merit points' and at the same time the starving child would still be saved. Problem solved. Sorry if it sounded a bit too...calculating.. :tongue:



Which seems to still rest on a transaction based morality, a business deal.
“ Your mind is likewise blocked. But the right road awaits you still. Cast out your doubts, your fears and your desires, let go of grief and of hope as well, for where these rule , then the mind is their subject." Boetius
User avatar
clw_uk
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am
Location: Wales, United Kingdom

Re: I'd feed a starving child before a plump arahant

Postby santa100 » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:58 am

clw_uk wrote:Which seems to still rest on a transaction based morality, a business deal


Label it whatever way you like. I'd just call it a win-win..
santa100
 
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:55 pm

Next

Return to Ethical Conduct

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests