Viṡuddhimagga Instructions on Metṭā

Discussion of Samatha bhavana and Jhana bhavana.

Viṡuddhimagga Instructions on Metṭā

Postby rohana » Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:27 am

Out of curiosity: in the Viṡuddhimagga, under the instructions for metṭā,

4. For loving-kindness should not be developed at first towards the following four kinds of persons: an antipathetic person, a very dearly loved friend, a neutral person, and a hostile person. Also it should not be developed specifically (see §49) towards the opposite sex, or towards a dead person.

...

7. But if he develops it towards a dead person, he reaches neither absorption nor access. A young bhikkhu, it seems, had started developing loving-kindness inspired by his teacher. His loving-kindness made no headway at all. He went to a senior elder and told him, “Venerable sir, I am quite familiar with attaining jhána through loving-kindness, and yet I cannot attain it. What is the matter?” The elder said, “Seek the sign, friend, [the object of your meditation].” He did so. Finding that his teacher had died, he proceeded with developing loving-kindness inspired by another and attained absorption. That is why it should not be developed towards one who is dead.

Path of Purification, Ñāṇamoli translation, pages 291-292.


Is there any explanation for why, if the object metṭā is directed at does not exist, then access concentration or beyond does is not achieved? It's sounds like, to reach access, you somehow need to 'connect' to the object(person), and therefore if the object doesn't exist, you don't get there? After all there are other mediation subjects that are not living beings (e.g. kasina) and they can lead to jhāna. So as long as one can generate metṭā in themselves, why does it matter if the person it is directed at really exists or not?
"Delighting in existence, O monks, are gods and men; they are attached to existence, they revel in existence. When the Dhamma for the cessation of existence is being preached to them, their minds do not leap towards it, do not get pleased with it, do not get settled in it, do not find confidence in it. That is how, monks, some lag behind."
- It. p 43
rohana
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:43 pm

Re: Viṡuddhimagga Instructions on Metṭā

Postby retrofuturist » Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:45 am

Greetings Rohana,

The backstory presented in the text sounds a little curious since, since it infers "connection", as you point out.

Two practical reasons for not selecting the dead may be that:

1. By virtue of being dead, there is no more experience for them as that dead person... thus, the dead person cannot be subject to dukkha and cannot be receptive to metta. Thus, one would know on some level that metta towards the deceased is misaligned - for how can one wish for them to be happy? (Respect on the other hand, or wishing a favourable rebirth etc. would not be out of line.)

2. Recalling them to mind may bring grief, which is counter-productive to mental tranquility.

In the context of the backstory, if you were under the impression that the recipient was alive, that would seem sufficient as far as I can tell, though obviously not for the text. Taking a sutta perspective, mind creates all mental states (Dhp1-2) including metta... thus the actual object seems a pragmatic concern at best.

Metta,
Retro. :)
If you have asked me of the origination of unease, then I shall explain it to you in accordance with my understanding:
Whatever various forms of unease there are in the world, They originate founded in encumbering accumulation. (Pārāyanavagga)


Exalted in mind, just open and clearly aware, the recluse trained in the ways of the sages:
One who is such, calmed and ever mindful, He has no sorrows! -- Udana IV, 7


Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum) -- Open flower ~ Open book (blog)
User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14622
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Viṡuddhimagga Instructions on Metṭā

Postby Ben » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:01 am

My own practice is to extend metta to myself first and then to all beings throughout the universe and then to dedicate my merits to particular individuals and groups (living and departed). I practice metta for a few minutes at the end of an hour+ session of vipassana. I did benefit from using the formula in the metta sutta and the Vism when I first commenced my meditation practice. These days, my metta practice is fairly fluid/free form.
kind regards,

Ben
"One cannot step twice into the same river, nor can one grasp any mortal substance in a stable condition, but it scatters and again gathers; it forms and dissolves, and approaches and departs."

- Hereclitus


Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR
Buddhist Life Stories of Australia

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15960
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Land of the sleeping gods

Re: Viṡuddhimagga Instructions on Metṭā

Postby mynameisadahn » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:50 pm

I believe Mahasi Sayadaw answers this question briefly, in his manual on Metta. (which is a book that can be found on the access to insight webpage, I believe). He is fairly brief, as I recall, and it is something like you cannot really wish good will towards someone who has passed on and is reincarnated, etc.

Sorry I do not recall the justification more specifically. But I would recommend this manual anyways, since it is another great source.
mynameisadahn
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:35 pm


Return to Samatha Meditation and Jhana

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests