Why the criticisms?

Discussion of Satipatthana bhavanā and Vipassana bhavana.
User avatar
Billymac29
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:07 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: New Jersey

Re: Why the criticisms?

Postby Billymac29 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:18 pm

tiltbillings wrote:
Billymac29 wrote: . . .
In addition to the the book I recommended here, let me also recommed a brilliant book by Ven Analayo: Satipatthana: The Direct Path to Realization.


Do you know if the Venerable Analayo's book is available for download online?
thanks Tilt :anjali:
"whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon will be the inclination of one's mind"

User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 20082
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Why the criticisms?

Postby tiltbillings » Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:31 pm

Billymac29 wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:
Billymac29 wrote: . . .
In addition to the the book I recommended here, let me also recommed a brilliant book by Ven Analayo: Satipatthana: The Direct Path to Realization.


Do you know if the Venerable Analayo's book is available for download online?
thanks Tilt :anjali:
Not legally.
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.

Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireas na daoine.
People live in one another’s shelter.

dheamhan a fhios agam

"We eat cold eels and think distant thoughts." -- Jack Johnson

User avatar
Billymac29
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:07 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: New Jersey

Re: Why the criticisms?

Postby Billymac29 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:08 pm

Bringing this post back to life because I just received Ven Analayo's book Satipatthana: The Direct Path to Realization after a suggestion from tilt. This book is probably the most thorough, scholarly, well researched book I have read on the satipatthana sutta and on the term sati in general. IMO it is the book to read if one wants to understand the practice of sati and satipatthana. It definitely answered a lot of questions I was carrying with me.

Thanks Tilt ;)
:anjali:
"whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon will be the inclination of one's mind"

User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 20082
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Why the criticisms?

Postby tiltbillings » Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:19 am

I am glad you found the book of value.

You might also find this series talks of value: http://www.dharmaseed.org/teacher/96/?s ... tipatthana
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond.
SN I, 38.

Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireas na daoine.
People live in one another’s shelter.

dheamhan a fhios agam

"We eat cold eels and think distant thoughts." -- Jack Johnson

alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006

Re: Why the criticisms?

Postby alan... » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:38 am

the noting and what not is straight out of the satipatthana sutta.

"when walking he understands 'i am walking'. "

sounds like noting too me. i don't see much at all that is not directly from the suttas as far as his practice instructions are concerned. they seem to be right in line with the suttas. his sitting meditation instructions are kind of a stretch at points but for the most part they're from the suttas as well, it's about interpretation.

the other instructions and what not about insight knowledges and stuff may be commentary but i don't know. what's more important though? that practical methods are canonical or that higher definitions and structure are?

User avatar
Billymac29
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:07 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: New Jersey

Re: Why the criticisms?

Postby Billymac29 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:27 am

:goodpost:
alan... wrote:the noting and what not is straight out of the satipatthana sutta.

"when walking he understands 'i am walking'. "

sounds like noting too me. i don't see much at all that is not directly from the suttas as far as his practice instructions are concerned. they seem to be right in line with the suttas. his sitting meditation instructions are kind of a stretch at points but for the most part they're from the suttas as well, it's about interpretation.

the other instructions and what not about insight knowledges and stuff may be commentary but i don't know. what's more important though? that practical methods are canonical or that higher definitions and structure are?

:goodpost:
"whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon will be the inclination of one's mind"


Return to “Insight Meditation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests