Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

The latest news and updates about the Dhamma Wheel forum.
Locked
PeterB
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:35 pm

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by PeterB »

I think whether humorous or passive aggressive that is enough Tilt bashing.
:guns:
User avatar
christopher:::
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by christopher::: »

Last edited by christopher::: on Tue Mar 01, 2011 4:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"As Buddhists, we should aim to develop relationships that are not predominated by grasping and clinging. Our relationships should be characterised by the brahmaviharas of metta (loving kindness), mudita (sympathetic joy), karuna (compassion), and upekkha (equanimity)."
~post by Ben, Jul 02, 2009
Nyana
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:56 am

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by Nyana »

PeterB wrote:I think whether humorous or passive aggressive that is enough Tilt bashing.
Merely a bit of jocular frivolity. But point taken.

All the best,

Geoff
User avatar
andre9999
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, US
Contact:

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by andre9999 »

PeterB wrote:I think whether humorous or passive aggressive that is enough Tilt bashing.
Commence the Peter bashing!
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19945
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by mikenz66 »

andre9999 wrote:
PeterB wrote:I think whether humorous or passive aggressive that is enough Tilt bashing.
Commence the Peter bashing!
Image
PeterB
Posts: 3909
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:35 pm

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by PeterB »

Peter bashing is fine...I am used to negative transference...it comes with my territory.
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by Ben »

andre9999 wrote:The current system seems to work just fine.
It does indeed. However as I said, improving the DW experience isn't just something the mods and admins are responsible for - its something we are all responsible for.
andre9999 wrote:I don't like peer moderation because a few people will inevitably start acting like hall monitors, finding identity and self-esteem in making sure everyone follows the rules exactly.
I don't think overzealousness of this variety would be tolerated either by my colleagues or the vast majority of our membrs. And if you see it happening and no one is intervening, all you need do is hit the report button, add your observations and it will be sent to the admin/mod team.
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 4533
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by Dan74 »

Another thought that came to mind is about how fora tend to lose interesting members. This is something I observed at ZFI and to some extent here.

One scenario is when a new person comes, typically quite young, with an uncommon intensity and some edginess or prickliness to them. They may have a passionate interest in the Dhamma but also some doubts that they voice quite openly. They tend to get set upon by some members who I guess take them as simply being rude. Whereas it may be the way they approach new things and they mean no disrespect.

What I am saying simply is that we should be careful not to give genuine people like this a short shrift but be a little more patient (which most people already are) and encouraging. It can make a great difference both to their lives and even to this forum.
_/|\_
plwk
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:14 am

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by plwk »

Since the sister site has gone through some cosmetic changes, any in the pipeline for this one?
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by Ben »

Hi Dan,
Dan74 wrote:Another thought that came to mind is about how fora tend to lose interesting members. This is something I observed at ZFI and to some extent here.

One scenario is when a new person comes, typically quite young, with an uncommon intensity and some edginess or prickliness to them. They may have a passionate interest in the Dhamma but also some doubts that they voice quite openly. They tend to get set upon by some members who I guess take them as simply being rude. Whereas it may be the way they approach new things and they mean no disrespect.

What I am saying simply is that we should be careful not to give genuine people like this a short shrift but be a little more patient (which most people already are) and encouraging. It can make a great difference both to their lives and even to this forum.
I understand where you are coming from. However, I believe that there is a minimum standard of online behaviour here. I think its well communicated via the TOS. I think most new people who are intense, edgy and appear rude learn pretty quickly what the culture is like here and they adjust their behaviour or they simply move on. I don't think its an unreasonable expectation that people take responsibility for their own online behaviour.
If there are any incidents which you feel a new member was given short shrift, please feel free to contact me or one of my colleagues and we will take a close look into it.
kind regards

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by Ben »

Hi plwk,
plwk wrote:Since the sister site has gone through some cosmetic changes, any in the pipeline for this one?
It hasn't even been raised within the admin forum! So, not as far as I am aware.
However, if you feel it needs a facelift, feel free to make a suggestion in our suggestion box.
kind regards

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Jechbi
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:38 am
Contact:

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by Jechbi »

retrofuturist wrote:May I ask, briefly... what makes you think that these things you speak of cannot already be done freely by members via the Suggestion Box?
Because members of the mod/admin team have directly told me that members are not allowed to post any comment about specific moderator decisions or moderator-related activities, and that the only permitted method of providing that type of feedback is privately, through PMs or the report function.

In addition, members of the mod/admin team have told me that comments or criticism of moderator decisions or moderator-related activities constitutes "meta discussion" and is prohibited under TOS.

Also, members of the mod/admin team have directly told me that if a member has a complaint about mod/admin action, it may not be presented publicly. Here is how one of the moderators put it in a message to me after removing one of my posts for that reason: "If you have a complaint, as you know, the correct procedure is to go through the complaints procedure."

Here's a further quote from a moderator to me: "I ask you that you desist from targeting Tilt and do not criticise DW in-thread." I have been directly told not to criticize DW publicly on DW.

In my experience, posts that might be construed as commentary about moderating decisions or moderating conduct are taken down and made invisible, on the basis that they violate TOS by not adhering to the "meta discussion" rule and by not following the complaints procedure.

That means that in effect, the things I speak of cannot be done freely by members via the Suggestion Box, unless you suspend the rules for them that you have imposed for me. In my experience, members of the mod/admin team do not allow public criticism of their decisions on this board.
Last edited by Jechbi on Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Jechbi,
Jechbi wrote:
retrofuturist wrote:May I ask, briefly... what makes you think that these things you speak of cannot already be done freely by members via the Suggestion Box?
Because members of the mod/admin team have directly told me that members are not allowed to post any comment about specific moderator decisions or moderator-related activities, and that the only permitted method of providing that type of feedback is privately, through PMs or the report function.
I'd be interested in seeing this communication, to see the context in which it was written.
Jechbi wrote:In addition, members of the mod/admin team have told me that comments or criticism of moderator decisions or moderator-related activities constitutes "meta discussion" and is prohibited under TOS.
That relates to discussion in the topic itself, as per the discussion on recent pages about meta-discussion. Do you appreciate the problems that arise from meta-discussion? Have you read the article linked to from the TOS that I referred Christopher::: to earlier? What did you make of it?
Jechbi wrote:Here's a further quote from a moderator to me: "I ask you that you desist from targeting Tilt and do not criticise DW in-thread." I have been directly told not to criticize DW publicly on DW.
Again, in-thread, as I was saying above... doing it in-topic is disruptive, do it via the appropriate channels.

To wit, there is nothing to stop someone going to the Suggestion Box (thereby not derailing the topic, therefore not being disruptive) and saying such-and-such and providing a link to the topic in question, if that serves as an example to contextualise their suggestion.
Jechbi wrote:Also, members of the mod/admin team have directly told me that if a member has a complaint about mod/admin action, it may not be presented publicly. Here is how one of the moderators put it in a message to me after removing one of my posts for that reason: "If you have a complaint, as you know, the correct procedure is to go through the complaints procedure."
And it is... the complaints procedure adjudicates in accordance with the TOS. But if you wish to suggest amendments to the ToS, or suggestions on how they may be better interpreted or implemented by moderators, you're welcome to use the Suggestion Box to do so.
Jechbi wrote:In my experience, posts that might be construed as commentary about moderating decisions or moderating conduct are taken down and made invisible, on the basis that they violate TOS by not adhering to the "meta discussion" rule and by not following the complaints procedure.
And rightly so... that is not the correct channel for such things for the reasons outlined about the disadvantages of meta-discussion.
Jechbi wrote:That means that in effect, the things I speak of cannot be done freely by members via the Suggestion Box, unless you suspend the rules for them that you have imposed for me. In my experience, members of the mod/admin team do not allow criticism of their decisions on this board.
As per my previous post, I think you may have construed some false assumptions which underpin this repression and constraint you seem to believe exists. They appear to be assumptions which are not commonly shared, and thus, communications between yourself and others (be they staff or other members) on this topic seem very disconnected. In my opinion, it is a conceptual prison of your own making... one not shared by others. As I said... I'm happy to work with you to break down these misconceptions and I hope this is the first post on that journey.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
christopher:::
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by christopher::: »

A suggestion (to take or leave)...

Forget the past. Just put it behind us, don't look at it too closely, let it go.

What is the situation now? This discussion (sparked by an offsite protest by Jechbi) has set a new precedent here at Dhamma Wheel. The moderators and administrators have shown an unprecedented willingness to accept dissent and criticism from members. Has anyone here seen this happen on another forum? I haven't.

Retro and the other moderators are telling us that suggestions and complaints can be made publicly, in the suggestion box area, but that one should go through private channels (PM) first. If anyone has questions about this, now is the time to ask. But if we start rehashing the past, trying to pin down whether these "restrictions" where "really" part of the DW rules or just assumptions in some members' heads, i think we can argue on forever.

What are the rules, what is the situation now? That's all that matters.

Just my 2 cents.

:anjali:
"As Buddhists, we should aim to develop relationships that are not predominated by grasping and clinging. Our relationships should be characterised by the brahmaviharas of metta (loving kindness), mudita (sympathetic joy), karuna (compassion), and upekkha (equanimity)."
~post by Ben, Jul 02, 2009
User avatar
Jechbi
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:38 am
Contact:

Re: Open invitation: Help us improve your DW experience!

Post by Jechbi »

I agree with you, Christopher. Good point.

Nevertheless, for clarity, I would like to respond to Retro.

Retro: The Suggestion Box idea is not what you told me way back at the beginning of the difficulties I began experiencing at Dhamma Wheel. At that time, you did not invite me to put my concerns into the Suggestion Box. You were very clear: I had to follow the Complaints Procedure and keep it private. Here's what you wrote to me:
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Jechbi,

Thank you for the PM.

I just wanted to let you know I have been following this matter, and that what you've said has not been ignored.

If you wish, you can engage the...

Dhamma Wheel complaints procedurehttp://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1846

If you do so, be clear to differentiate between what posts, PMs or acts of moderation have been problematic. You will need to be specific.
Some time later, you again wrote to me that if I should have future concerns, I should use the Complaints Procedure. Here is your note to me (I added bold to one part for clarity):
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Jechbi,

We have reviewed your complaint (in its entirety, but which you summarized thusly)....
I. Tilt has posted comments to me that directly violate the TOS, which state: "Mutual respect and friendliness should be the basis of all interactions."
II. Tilt has blurred the line between moderator and member by deleting posts from a thread in which he was engaged in debate.
III. Dhamma Wheel leadership did not respond in a meaningful way to specific concerns that I raised. Rather, Dhamma Wheel leadership answered my concerns by telling me someone would get back to me, or by criticizing me, or by offering a blanket defense of Tilt in general terms without going into specifics.
IV. Tilt initiated a PM exchange with me that was adversarial, in violation of TOS.
...and the desired outcomes that you noted in your Statement of Suitable Outcome...
a) Greater mutual respect and understanding among all of us.
b) The improvement of Dhamma Wheel so that it becomes a safer place to engage in Dhamma discussion without being subject to unfriendly, disrespectful comments posted by a moderator.
c) A respectful, friendly response of substance from Dhamma Wheel leadership to the concerns I have raised, preferably from someone besides Tilt.
d) Greater peace, harmony and happiness for every one of us.
In light of the Concerns and preferred Outcome, we have made some changes behind the scenes which we believe will prevent I, II, or IV occurring in the future. As for III, you now know the formal complaints procedure, should any grounds for future complaint arise.

We believe the internal changes that we have implemented, based on your complaint, are compatible with positive progress on each of your listed Suitable Outcomes. Let's see how it goes.

Thank you for your interest and concern regarding Dhamma Wheel.

Metta,
Retro. :)
If you had invited me at that time to use the Suggestion Box, I would have. But you did not, and I have tried to be very careful to follow your rules. That may be why I have not yet been banned.

After I made this complaint, things actually got worse. And in the subsequent interactions with the mod/admin team, never once did any of you suggest that I use the Suggestion Box. On the contrary, I was told on more than one occassion NOT to make public complaints.

Moreover, when I met privately with David at his invitation, I asked him about this. I do not want to misrepresent what he told me, but my question to him was whether he agrees with the rule that public criticism of moderator decisions is not allowed. I know what I asked him, and I know he did not suggest that such comments belong in the Suggestion Box.
Locked