retrofuturist wrote:Greetings members,
Over recent months, one Dhamma Wheel member has expressed grave dissatisfaction in relation to the way this forum is managed, via a blog specifically designed to target this forum and its volunteer staff.
Lest it be soddened by the rain
http://dhammawheel.wordpress.com/2010/0 ... llo-world/
A good reality check. Thanks.Jhana4 wrote: One thing I learned from the experience is that disputes on internet forums only matter to the people involved. Nobody else cares.
Modus.Ponens wrote:I've been here since the beggining and only have two major cases where I've been displeased with a moderator or another member: the case which was the reason to create two more subforums for meditation. In that case the moderator said he was sorry in the thread he ruined so no problem there. And the other one is when people make fun of Hanzze, namely alan.
Apart from that I'm quite satisfied with this forum in the years I've been here. And let me take this oportunity to thank David Snyder for the forum he has provided us with and to the moderating team for doing an excelent job in general.

tiltbillings wrote:A good reality check. Thanks.Jhana4 wrote: One thing I learned from the experience is that disputes on internet forums only matter to the people involved. Nobody else cares.
Warm Fuzzies all around.PeterB wrote:tiltbillings wrote:A good reality check. Thanks.Jhana4 wrote: One thing I learned from the experience is that disputes on internet forums only matter to the people involved. Nobody else cares.
True that. Just the people who are involved and the occasional person who likes to play Eric Berne's
" Lets HIM and YOU fight "....
PeterB wrote:Modus.Ponens wrote:I've been here since the beggining and only have two major cases where I've been displeased with a moderator or another member: the case which was the reason to create two more subforums for meditation. In that case the moderator said he was sorry in the thread he ruined so no problem there. And the other one is when people make fun of Hanzze, namely alan.
Apart from that I'm quite satisfied with this forum in the years I've been here. And let me take this oportunity to thank David Snyder for the forum he has provided us with and to the moderating team for doing an excelent job in general.
I think that the mods and members including alan, are EXTRAORDINARILY patient with Hannze, who despite a number of very reasonable requests has made no effort to either improve his English or to glean even a basic knowledge of the Theravada.
I will join you raising a glass of non alcoholic beer to David and the Mods.....thats sounds like a 70's band.

PeterB wrote:Sorry Anna...not buying it . If my French, German, Italian, was as poor as Hanzze's English I would not even attempt to communicate on a website in French, German or Italian...on at least 20 occasions he has had feedback from a number of different people saying that they have no idea what he is trying to communicating. Several people have made the point to him that if he spent just part of the time he spends posting in improving his English everyone including him, would benefit.
Then there is the other point, he has made no attempt to grasp even the basic points of Theravada Buddhism and instead refers to a weird hybrid of Mahayana and Animism of his own devising.
I simply read past his posts without stopping at them. I cant be arsed.
If at anytime he appears to be making an effort to understand the Theravada view instead of delivering lectures characterised by banality and gibberish in equal measure, I will start reading them.
PS YOUR English Fraulein Anna is better than many of the English speakers on the forum.
"Whoever returns insult to one who is insulting, returns taunts to one who is taunting, returns a berating to one who is berating, is said to be eating together, sharing company, with that person. But I am neither eating together nor sharing your company, brahman. It's all yours. It's all yours."
4. "He abused me, he struck me, he overpowered me, he robbed me." Those who do not harbor such thoughts still their hatred.
5. Hatred is never appeased by hatred in this world. By non-hatred alone is hatred appeased. This is a law eternal.
6. There are those who do not realize that one day we all must die. But those who do realize this settle their quarrels.
PeterB wrote:Sorry Anna...not buying it . If my French, German, Italian, was as poor as Hanzze's English I would not even attempt to communicate on a website in French, German or Italian...on at least 20 occasions he has had feedback from a number of different people saying that they have no idea what he is trying to communicating. Several people have made the point to him that if he spent just part of the time he spends posting in improving his English everyone including him, would benefit.
Then there is the other point, he has made no attempt to grasp even the basic points of Theravada Buddhism and instead refers to a weird hybrid of Mahayana and Animism of his own devising.
I simply read past his posts without stopping at them. I cant be arsed.
If at anytime he appears to be making an effort to understand the Theravada view instead of delivering lectures characterised by banality and gibberish in equal measure, I will start reading them.
PS YOUR English Fraulein Anna is better than many of the English speakers on the forum.

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings members,
Over recent months, one Dhamma Wheel member has expressed grave dissatisfaction in relation to the way this forum is managed, via a blog specifically designed to target this forum and its volunteer staff.
Lest it be soddened by the rain
http://dhammawheel.wordpress.com/2010/0 ... llo-world/
On his blog, the author goes so far as to say, "The bottom line is that my experience at Dhamma Wheel has been by far the most negative experience I’ve ever had on the web."
We had talked about it some length among ourselves. It was only a matter of time before one or more of DW's regulars would run across this blog. We felt that since it was out there, we might as well acknowledge it and in the process acknowledge that is the DW participants who do have questions and issues with how the DW is run, they certainly can use that blog as a forum for expressing that without fear or reprisal; however, we would rather that any concerns would be dealt directly here.Jhana4 wrote:
FWIW, I use the same kind of blogging software that this person does. If his service is the same as mine he gets a list of URLs where links to his blog are posted.. In my experience the kind of feelings he has from this conflict gets fed by attention. I wouldn't have known about his blog, the particular conflict or any conflict on DW if not for this thread.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], binocular, Dan74, dannyj, Google [Bot], Hickersonia, inge, JadeRabbit, Kim O'Hara, Lazy_eye, Modus.Ponens, purple planet, reflection, Sekha