rowyourboat wrote:Hi Individual
Realizing Anatta and stream entry are not synonymous, no?
Not ultimately a "person" no but am I right that there is "ultimately" a set of skandhas that enter the path of vision?Individual wrote:This is an old discussion but if I can add to it: There are no such thing as stream-enterers; that is, "stream-entering persons." This is only a conventional expression
Individual wrote: Outside points of view, there are no skandhas.
appicchato wrote:...people...I would suspect may have problems with reality.
Don't we all?...
kirk5a wrote:Individual wrote: Outside points of view, there are no skandhas.
That is nihilism. If there are no skandhas other than point of view, then there are no fingers, and so how did these messages get typed out?
Individual wrote:It would be nihilism if it were fabricated and mused over in terms of self; it is not nihilism when it is experienced and used selflessly.
kirk5a wrote:Individual wrote:It would be nihilism if it were fabricated and mused over in terms of self; it is not nihilism when it is experienced and used selflessly.
Then use it in answering my question, please.
Individual wrote:Don't make problems
divine wrote:How can this be?
But are you sure you have reached any level of "enlightenment?" There are so many things that can mimic what we think "enlightenment" is. The best approach to "enlightenment" is that is just one more of which to let go. Anyway, good luck.divine wrote:Hel.
Despite having reached this level of enlightenment
What is the source of this information? I am sceptic to these institutionalised religion-like stuff, but I recognised enough from my experience with what I read on wikipedia to be ready to read the original scriptures.
Registered users: Alex123, barcsimalsi, Ben, Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], cooran, fivebells, Google [Bot], mettafuture, Modus.Ponens, palchi, polarbuddha101, purple planet, retrofuturist, Sekha, vagrancy