What is "physicalism" and why is it a misconception?Akuma wrote:1) TNH wasnt born yet when the writings of classical Theravada were created so classical Theravada doesnt have a viewpoint on this.
2) TNH's concept is incompatible with DO because his idea is not based on abhidharma at all but on physicalism; a typical misconception - not only with "Mahayanis" tho.
Interbeing ?
Re: Interbeing ?
"When one thing is practiced & pursued, ignorance is abandoned, clear knowing arises, the conceit 'I am' is abandoned, latent tendencies are uprooted, fetters are abandoned. Which one thing? Mindfulness immersed in the body." -AN 1.230
Re: Interbeing ?
I am interested in whether in the view of those who have a depth knowledge of the Pali TNH's development can be extrapolated in a logical way that accords with the Classical view.Akuma wrote:1) TNH wasnt born yet when the writings of classical Theravada were created so classical Theravada doesnt have a viewpoint on this.
2) TNH's concept is incompatible with DO because his idea is not based on abhidharma at all but on physicalism; a typical misconception - not only with "Mahayanis" tho.
Re: Interbeing ?
Thanks, Peter.PeterB wrote:" Interbeing" is a concept found frequently on Buddhist forae.
I am interested to know if it is derived from, or can be equated to, any formulation found within the Classical Theravada schema.
And of course if so, where.
May I ask why you're asking?
Are you intending a merely academical exchange?
Or would it affect any personal feelings or thoughts you may be having about interbeing if you were presented a Theravada source?
Re: Interbeing ?
Ah, an answer arrived.PeterB wrote:Ok its not subtle guys. I suspect that the "Interbeing" concept is an innovation that has no pedigree within the teachings of the Buddha.
I think it was invented. No doubt its inventor had good intentions, but we know what is paved with good intentions dont we.
I think it has actually become a barrier to understanding D.O.
I would like those with more knowledge of the Pali Canon than me to show me whether my thoughts on the matter are in accord with theirs.
And to show mw me either way from the Classical theravadin POV.
I had a feeling that's your drift.
Hm. I think that many Buddhist monks have their own unique way of imparting and explaining aspects of the Dhamma.I suspect that the "Interbeing" concept is an innovation that has no pedigree within the teachings of the Buddha.
I think it was invented.
To me it's no barrier.I think it has actually become a barrier to understanding.
It may be for some, but -different strokes for different blokes, they say.
It's not your cup of tea, I reckon...
Re: Interbeing ?
I don't think that interbeing is a very common expression beyond TNH. Nevertheless, it's not uncommon to find pratītyasamutpāda (paticcasamuppāda) translated as "interdependent origination" etc., which is not the most accurate translation. Anyway, there is really no Pāli source for interbeing, as it is based on Chinese Huayan sources which were developments from the Avataṃsaka Sūtra.PeterB wrote:" Interbeing" is a concept found frequently on Buddhist forae.
I am interested to know if it is derived from, or can be equated to, any formulation found within the Classical Theravada schema.
All the best,
Geoff
Re: Interbeing ?
Its certainly not my cup of tea Anna....but it might be more than simply a matter of taste.
I think it dilutes a radical aspect of the Buddhas teaching.
But I am also aware that because TNH's style does nothing for me that I might be missing something.
Hence my asking what the pedigree of this concept is when viewed from a Classical Theravada pov.
I can see that it could be extrapolated from Mahayana teachings like "Buddha Nature ", which is I suspect its actual origin, but I cannot see a relationship to the Theravada.
I think it dilutes a radical aspect of the Buddhas teaching.
But I am also aware that because TNH's style does nothing for me that I might be missing something.
Hence my asking what the pedigree of this concept is when viewed from a Classical Theravada pov.
I can see that it could be extrapolated from Mahayana teachings like "Buddha Nature ", which is I suspect its actual origin, but I cannot see a relationship to the Theravada.
Last edited by PeterB on Mon Feb 07, 2011 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Interbeing ?
Thanks Geoff, do you want to say a few words more about those developments ?Ñāṇa wrote:I don't think that interbeing is a very common expression beyond TNH. Nevertheless, it's not uncommon to find pratītyasamutpāda (paticcasamuppāda) translated as "interdependent origination" etc., which is not the most accurate translation. Anyway, there is really no Pāli source for interbeing, as it is based on Chinese Huayan sources which were developments from the Avataṃsaka Sūtra.PeterB wrote:" Interbeing" is a concept found frequently on Buddhist forae.
I am interested to know if it is derived from, or can be equated to, any formulation found within the Classical Theravada schema.
All the best,
Geoff
Re: Interbeing ?
The idea of matter being made up of atomic components and transforming into different forms according to the laws of physics, which usually presupposes matter to be somewhere "outside" and so on. This would be a misconception in regard to Theravadin philosophy as its not in accord with DO or with the 4 kinds of nutriment if this idea would have existed back then. There have been schools in time before and of the Buddha which preached materialism tho and the Buddha didnt liek that at all, especially not the deterministic one.What is "physicalism" and why is it a misconception?
Well without being a Theravadin I see a problem with temporal causation. Eventho in your school rupas are not directly karmically caused, they are indirectly because they are witnessed at certain times by cittas, time being nothing more then the sequence of cittas arising. TNH on the other hand side is probably viewing objects (not paramattha dhammas) as being in space-time as the physicalists see it, so his whole causation-theory is different, time being either an absolute ticker or a relative one, which he will have trouble explaining. Its also problematic as his objects (book, sun etc) are from Therevada pov only concepts and therefore their causation and transformation is only conceptual, too, which leads to the problem that the only outcome will be the realisation of the emptiness of concepts. In addition - this is also a problem that the Buddha of the Nikayas himself has tho - the whole Theravadin philosophy doesnt accept neither a space nor a time "container" for dharmas to be in.I am interested in whether in the view of those who have a depth knowledge of the Pali TNH's development can be extrapolated in a logical way that accords with the Classical view.
From a practical POV Theravada-Abhidhamma requests the trainee to realize the momentary and made-up-of-transient-dhammas nature of reality, matter then only being a temporary assembly of the 4 elements; the 3 marks being then seen on the so-perceived paramattha-dhamma, resulting in enlightenment. TNH on the other hand side seems to try to achieve enlightenment thru the realisation of the interconnectedness of things which for the Theravadin are double-unreal resulting in his idea to only lead to more delusion.
Re: Interbeing ?
The view goes back to the metaphor of Indra's net in the Avataṃsaka Sūtra, where there is a jewel at each intersection of a vast net, and each jewel reflects the image of every other jewel in the net. Thus, each jewel contains the image of every other jewel and is a representation of the whole. The Chinese Huayan tradition then developed this metaphor into a view of the "mutual interpenetration of all phenomena," an "oceanic reflection" meditation, and so on. These developments then influenced Chinese Chan as well as Japanese Zen teachers such as Dōgen Zenji.PeterB wrote:Thanks Geoff, do you want to say a few words more about those developments ?
All the best,
Geoff
Re: Interbeing ?
So at what point Geoff did this rather beautiful metaphor start to be seen as a concrete reality ?
Re: Interbeing ?
Which, Peter?PeterB wrote:
I think it dilutes a radical aspect of the Buddhas teaching.
I understand.But I am also aware that because TNH's style does nothing for me that I might be missing something.
Hence my asking what the pedigree of this concept is when viewed from a Classical Theravada pov.
Re: Interbeing ?
This metaphor was never really developed in the Indo-Tibetan tradition, where Mādhyamaka negation is employed. Someone like Ven. Huifeng would likely know the specific developments of these ideas within Chinese Buddhist thought.PeterB wrote:So at what point Geoff did this rather beautiful metaphor start to be seen as a concrete reality ?
All the best,
Geoff
-
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:29 pm
- Location: London, UK
Re: Interbeing ?
4.& 5. "Whatever living beings there may be — feeble or strong (or the seekers and the attained) long, stout, or of medium size, short, small, large, those seen or those unseen, those dwelling far or near, those who are born as well as those yet to be born — may all beings have happy minds.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .piya.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Name-and-form
"'From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-and-form.' Thus it has been said. And this is the way to understand how from consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-and-form. If consciousness were not to descend into the mother's womb, would name-and-form take shape in the womb?"
"No, lord."
"If, after descending into the womb, consciousness were to depart, would name-and-form be produced for this world?"
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
'Yes, master, we know how there is the descent of an embryo. There is the case where the mother & father have come together, the mother is fertile, and a gandhabba [the being about to be reborn] is standing present. The coming together of these three is the descent of the embryo.'
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think it can be debated either way. Who is to say there is a being now, much less in-between.
with metta
Matheesha
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .piya.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Name-and-form
"'From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-and-form.' Thus it has been said. And this is the way to understand how from consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-and-form. If consciousness were not to descend into the mother's womb, would name-and-form take shape in the womb?"
"No, lord."
"If, after descending into the womb, consciousness were to depart, would name-and-form be produced for this world?"
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
'Yes, master, we know how there is the descent of an embryo. There is the case where the mother & father have come together, the mother is fertile, and a gandhabba [the being about to be reborn] is standing present. The coming together of these three is the descent of the embryo.'
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I think it can be debated either way. Who is to say there is a being now, much less in-between.
with metta
Matheesha
With Metta
Karuna
Mudita
& Upekkha
Karuna
Mudita
& Upekkha
Re: Interbeing ?
The idea os TNH's baby. http://www.orderofinterbeing.org/aboutoi.html
My guess is that people who get into it don't care that it has no basis in the suttas.
My guess is that people who get into it don't care that it has no basis in the suttas.
Re: Interbeing ?
There are 86 posts here on Thich Nhat Hanh: Dependant Co-arising & Inter-Being
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=5460" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=5460" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---