I don't think he came here for your very strange mini-lecture on what you seem not to understand at all.Hanzze wrote:Dear legallybuddhist,
analyze "right" speech (don't lie) exactly.
As for better justice you would need to integrate motivation/intention into the measurement. But who would accept justice without victim and aggressor, right and wrong. Mediation, I guess is a better tool. It would bring solutions, but what if one just likes to win?
Yes; however, he grew up in Germany, which has a very good legal structure.alan wrote:Hanzze lives in a country with no legal structure.
tiltbillings wrote:Yes; however, he grew up in Germany, which has a very good legal structure.alan wrote:Hanzze lives in a country with no legal structure.
You did, and as for all the rest, you are in no place to lecture any lawyer here.Hanzze wrote:tiltbillings wrote:Yes; however, he grew up in Germany, which has a very good legal structure.alan wrote:Hanzze lives in a country with no legal structure.
Who tells you that I grow up in Germany
tiltbillings wrote:You did, and as for all the rest, you are in no place to lecture any lawyer here.
It is pretty much what you demonstrate.Hanzze wrote:tiltbillings wrote:You did, and as for all the rest, you are in no place to lecture any lawyer here.
What ever you believe and judge.

PeterB wrote:I am afraid that her experience on E Sangha has caused her to place several bargepoles between herself and online Buddhist forums however.
Ben wrote:Anyway, just returning to topic...
I think its interesting that the Buddha founded the oldest continuously operating legal system (the vinaya) and institution (the sangha) in the world. How about that?
I think there's great opportunity for sincere practitioners of the Dhamma who are in the legal profession to utilise their knowledge and understanding of the Dhamma in their professional lives for the benefit of themselves, their clients and their communities. I only wish my older brother and my father had contact with the Dhamma - and for that matter, all my family.
kind regards
Ben
You very naughty human being suggesting that the Buddha would have anything to do with {{{gasp}}} enforcement of any sort.retrofuturist wrote:Greetings Hanzze,
I find your comments odd, when the Buddha dispensed the patimokkha (Vinaya rules) and the means for their correct enforcement.
Metta,
Retro.
BlackBird wrote:Pretty sure that the Vinaya is a legal system. I'm also pretty sure there are a lot of ethically minded lawyers out there who put their morality before any legal dispute. I am finally, pretty sure that lawyers are not included under the Buddha's list of wrong livelihoods.
Soldiers are trained to kill.
Lawyers are trained to argue.
The comparison doesn't stack up.

Return to Theravāda for the modern world
Registered users: Bakmoon, Bhikkhu_Samahita, Bing [Bot], Dan74, diptych4, EmptyShadow, fig tree, Google [Bot], inge, jadborn, Lazy_eye, lifefool, Mindstar, Modus.Ponens, polarbuddha101, reflection, skyway, Vern Stevens