Pornography

Buddhist ethical conduct including the Five Precepts (Pañcasikkhāpada), and Eightfold Ethical Conduct (Aṭṭhasīla).
User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 5584
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Pornography

Post by Kim OHara »

AnonOfIbid wrote:Porn in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
Arsenic in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
Heroin in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
Alcohol in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
AnonOfIbid wrote:Saying the PRECEPTS forbid illicit sex, and pointing to canonical texts, is a NOT a HELPFUL/SKILLFUL response.
If that's really your view, why are you posting to a Buddhist forum?
:thinking:

:namaste:
Kim
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

Kim O'Hara wrote:
AnonOfIbid wrote:Porn in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
Arsenic in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
Heroin in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
Alcohol in and of itself is not harmful. The harm comes from how we behave in to relation to it.
AnonOfIbid wrote:Saying the PRECEPTS forbid illicit sex, and pointing to canonical texts, is a NOT a HELPFUL/SKILLFUL response.
If that's really your view, why are you posting to a Buddhist forum?
:thinking:

:namaste:
Kim
CLINGING to, GRASPING for, CRAVING, DESIRING, etc... porn CAN BE harmful IF one acts on them. You can say, "The porn made me do it!" but would anyone believe you?
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Pornography

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,

Clinging, grasping, craving and desire are the acts themselves .

The objects of clinging etc. are secondary to the act of clinging itself.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

[quote="Dan74"]What are you looking for in this thread, Anon? As it progresses it seems more and more likely that retro was right in his initial comment - you have your views and you are looking for support rather than being open to other views.
[quote]

You don't know what my views are. What are you looking for in replying to this thread, Dan?
Last edited by AnonOfIbid on Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

Dan74 wrote:What are you looking for in this thread, Anon?
Are you familiar with the notions of Socratic method for arriving at "truth" the "nature of reality," civil debate, intellectual discussion, where people engage you INTELLECTUALLY without wasting time determining your "motives," "agendas," "reasons," etc.... Is that so much to ask?
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

Dan74 wrote:What are you looking for in this thread, Anon?

As it progresses it seems more and more likely that retro was right in his initial comment - you have your views and you are looking for support rather than being open to other views.
You don't know what my views are. What are you looking for in replying to this thread, Dan?
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Pornography

Post by ground »

AnonOfIbid wrote:Can one "use" it non-harmfully?
I wonder what might be called "non-harmful" about conditioning oneself to attachment and sensual pleasures in the context of the Buddha's way?
From a worldly perspective you may certainly find arguments in favor of pornography like e.g. sexually enriching a boring relationship.

Kind regards
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

TMingyur wrote:
AnonOfIbid wrote:Can one "use" it non-harmfully?

From a worldly perspective you may certainly find arguments in favor of pornography like e.g. sexually enriching a boring relationship.
Kind regards
:smile:

How many folks would consider looking at naked or sexual pictures or videos of their spouse as a pornographic act? Would it bee harmful?
User avatar
andre9999
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, US
Contact:

Re: Pornography

Post by andre9999 »

The Socratic method doesn't just mean asking random questions.

The Buddha said many times that his concern was reducing suffering. Many Buddhists' primary concern in their practice is reducing their suffering, and anything unrelated to that goal is simply not a concern.

So in your opinion, how does looking at porn reduce the watcher's suffering?
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

The second citation is too old to be relevant/useful/helpful. The first citation does not help me personally (i'm married and we do not watch porn as part of lovemaking). I also question the second citation's general utility in light of other comments I've made here.
Dan74 wrote: As to effects, here's some stuff....
Last edited by retrofuturist on Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Lengthy verbatim quote of Dan's earlier citations removed
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Pornography

Post by ground »

AnonOfIbid wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
AnonOfIbid wrote:Can one "use" it non-harmfully?

From a worldly perspective you may certainly find arguments in favor of pornography like e.g. sexually enriching a boring relationship.
Kind regards
:smile:

How many folks would consider looking at naked or sexual pictures or videos of their spouse as a pornographic act? Would it bee harmful?
Regardless whether this may meet the demand caused by desire and lust transforming a living sentient being into an object may be harmful, yes.

Kind regards
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

even consensually?
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Pornography

Post by ground »

AnonOfIbid wrote:even consensually?
I think so because it is all about your own mind.

Kind regards
AnonOfIbid

Re: Pornography

Post by AnonOfIbid »

TMingyur wrote:
AnonOfIbid wrote:even consensually?
I think so because it is all about your own mind.

Kind regards
If it's all about your own mind, then it's not about the object or it's images.
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Pornography

Post by ground »

AnonOfIbid wrote:
TMingyur wrote:
AnonOfIbid wrote:even consensually?
I think so because it is all about your own mind.

Kind regards
If it's all about your own mind, then it's not about the object or it's images.
The object is the object of your mind. There is no other object that is accessible to you. The way you are perceiving is your mind. It is also volition that causes further effects.

Kind regards
Post Reply