Shakya=Scythian?

Textual analysis and comparative discussion on early Buddhist sects and texts.

Shakya=Scythian?

Postby Kusala » Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:39 pm

Hello Dhamma friends. Some scholars suggest the Buddha's clan may have been Scythian. Is there any truth to it?
User avatar
Kusala
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: Shakya=Scythian?

Postby Kim O'Hara » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:44 pm

Hi, Kusala,
Three answers - accept any or all of them as you like :smile: because I think they are all correct.
(1) It doesn't matter. What matters is what he taught.
(2) Probably not, going by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians - but 'Scythian' is so poorly defined anyway that the answer is not going to be very meaningful.
(3) If you said which scholars and where, we might be able to give you a more reasoned response to their claims.

:namaste:
Kim
User avatar
Kim O'Hara
 
Posts: 2456
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Shakya=Scythian?

Postby jayarava » Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:38 pm

Actually no less a scholar that Professor Michael Witzel has recently proposed, in an online forum (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Indo-Eura ... sage/13470), that the Śākya tribe may well have been related to the Śakas of Iran. Anyone wishing to follow this up can consult his published essay: The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/canon.pdf
jayarava
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:17 pm


Return to Early Buddhism

Who is online

Registered users: Alex123, Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], cooran, fivebells, Google [Bot], Jacksin, male_robin, mikenz66, onaquest, reflection, skyway