Pelletboy wrote:
why does the dhamma encourage monks to do jhanas up to immaterial jhanas which would cause one to miss the Sasanas?
santa100 wrote:Pelletboy wrote:
why does the dhamma encourage monks to do jhanas up to immaterial jhanas which would cause one to miss the Sasanas?
A monk after passing the first 4 "form" jhanas and reach the next 4 "formless" jhanas should not stop there according to the teaching. There's the 9th one (last one): cessation of feeling & perception, the final steppting stone toward arthantship and enlightenment. So, the formless jahnas mentioned in the Suttas are the means to an end but are not the end themselves.
ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jhana
pelletboy wrote:santa100 wrote:Pelletboy wrote:
why does the dhamma encourage monks to do jhanas up to immaterial jhanas which would cause one to miss the Sasanas?
A monk after passing the first 4 "form" jhanas and reach the next 4 "formless" jhanas should not stop there according to the teaching. There's the 9th one (last one): cessation of feeling & perception, the final steppting stone toward arthantship and enlightenment. So, the formless jahnas mentioned in the Suttas are the means to an end but are not the end themselves.
ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jhana
If one would look at the case of Asita the seer, there is the risk of being reborn in the immaterial realms after death if one does not attain the fruits of the DHamma(from stream-entry to arhatship). So why encourage it?
If one is born in higher fine material and immaterial realms then why does the dhamma encourage monks to do jhanas up to immaterial jhanas which would cause one to miss the Sasanas?
Zom wrote:If one is born in higher fine material and immaterial realms then why does the dhamma encourage monks to do jhanas up to immaterial jhanas which would cause one to miss the Sasanas?
Because with the right view attaining jhana will result either in non-returning or arahantship.
What is more, MN 64 tells that it is impossible to become a non-returner without a jhana:
It is not possible that one could, knowing and seeing overcome the lower bonds of the sensual world without coming to this path and method. It is like one come to a huge standing tree with heartwood, would cut the heartwood without removing the bark and sapwood. That is not possible, in the same manner, it is not possible that one could know, see and overcome the lower bonds of the sensual world, without coming to this path and method.
what is the path and method, to dispel the lower bonds of the sensual world? ânanda, the bhikkhu secluding the mind thoroughly, by dispelling things of demerit, removes all bodily transgressions that bring remorse. Then secluding the mind, from sensual thoughts and thoughts of demerit, with thoughts and discursive thoughts and with joy and pleasantness born of seclusion abides in the first jhana (an so on up the jhanas).
http://metta.lk/tipitaka/2Sutta-Pitaka/ ... ta-e1.html
It is stated in the Jhana book ny Bhante Henepola which I think he derived from the suttas and the commentaries that there were arhats who achieved arhatship through dry-insight alone without jhana much less those who achieved non-returnership without jhana...
Zom wrote:It is stated in the Jhana book ny Bhante Henepola which I think he derived from the suttas and the commentaries that there were arhats who achieved arhatship through dry-insight alone without jhana much less those who achieved non-returnership without jhana...
The sutta speaks for itself. Buddha says "impossible". So it's up to you to decide if the sutta lies or not ,)
Should one know all the jhanas to be liberated? Or is it enough to have just one, the first jhana? ANd did it say that knwoing jhana inevitably leads to liberation but liberation does not always accompany jhana? If the former is true, then there would not be any puthujana brahmas born because all of them wopuld be Noble Ones am i right?
Return to Samatha Meditation and Jhana
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests