Drolma wrote:Cool subject, Seer. In my tradition we're taught that meditating on emptiness generates merit
Would you happen to know what the basis of that is?
Bhikkhu Bodhi wrote:The Anguttara Nikaya (A.iv,392-95) records a fabulous alms-giving conducted by the Bodhisatta when he was born as a brahman named Velama. Lavish gifts of silver, gold, elephants, cows, carriages, etc., not to mention food, drink and clothing, were distributed among everybody who came forward to receive them. But this open-handed munificence was not very valuable as far as merit was concerned because there were no worthy recipients. It is said to be more meritorious to feed one person with right view, a stream-enterer (sotapanna), than to give great alms such as that given by Velama. It is more meritorious to feed one once-returner than a hundred stream-enterers. Next in order come non-returners, arahants, Paccekabuddhas and Sammasambuddhas. Feeding the Buddha and the Sangha is more meritorious than feeding the Buddha alone. It is even more meritorious to construct a monastery for the general use of the Sangha of the four quarters of all times. Taking refuge in the Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha is better still. Abiding by the Five Precepts is even more valuable. But better still is the cultivation of metta, loving-kindness, and best of all, the insight into impermanence, which leads to Nibbana.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... el367.html

puthujjana wrote:There is a sutta in the Anguttara Nikaya (A.iv,392-95) about merit, which I can't find on AccessToInsight...
But there is an article by Bhikkhu Bodhi which summarizes it:Bhikkhu Bodhi wrote:The Anguttara Nikaya (A.iv,392-95) records a fabulous alms-giving conducted by the Bodhisatta when he was born as a brahman named Velama. Lavish gifts of silver, gold, elephants, cows, carriages, etc., not to mention food, drink and clothing, were distributed among everybody who came forward to receive them. But this open-handed munificence was not very valuable as far as merit was concerned because there were no worthy recipients. It is said to be more meritorious to feed one person with right view, a stream-enterer (sotapanna), than to give great alms such as that given by Velama. It is more meritorious to feed one once-returner than a hundred stream-enterers. Next in order come non-returners, arahants, Paccekabuddhas and Sammasambuddhas. Feeding the Buddha and the Sangha is more meritorious than feeding the Buddha alone. It is even more meritorious to construct a monastery for the general use of the Sangha of the four quarters of all times. Taking refuge in the Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha is better still. Abiding by the Five Precepts is even more valuable. But better still is the cultivation of metta, loving-kindness, and best of all, the insight into impermanence, which leads to Nibbana.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... el367.html
with metta
retrofuturist wrote:Metta (loving-kindness), karuna (compassion) and mudita are certainly all geared towards of kusala kamma. Because they also reduce the emphasis and focus of thoughts towards ourselves, they also assist in weakening the ego.
SeerObserver wrote:But are these meditations acts of kusala kamma in and of themselves, or just "geared towards it"? Or is that what you meant by geared towards?
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings SeerObserver,SeerObserver wrote:But are these meditations acts of kusala kamma in and of themselves, or just "geared towards it"? Or is that what you meant by geared towards?
They are acts of kusala kamma in themselves, but I say "geared towards" because that's the primary benefit to be achieved, albeit not the only one.
Metta,
Retro.

Ngawang Drolma wrote:Sorry Seer, I got distracted![]()
I've heard this several times so I will find out the reasoning behind it.

Return to General Theravāda discussion
Registered users: Alex123, Ben, Billymac29, Bing [Bot], cooran, Coyote, dharmagoat, Exabot [Bot], gavesako, Google [Bot], Kim O'Hara, Majjhima Patipada, mikenz66, Modus.Ponens, onaquest, Zenainder