Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Explore the ancient language of the Tipitaka and Theravāda commentaries

Moderator: Mahavihara moderator

Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Postby blackspaven » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:45 pm

Ah, thanks for pointing out the 'I'... that might have been embarassing if i'd have put a full stop on the end! :tongue:

Thanks again for all your help, I think I can go ahead with what I wanted to do now.

:namaste:
blackspaven
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Postby blackspaven » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:42 pm

Out of interest, can I assume that there's now right or wrong way for these aspects to be followed in terms of the way they're written down? The way they've been listed so far in this thread is just the way they were written; there's nothing to say if they are to be reproduced in another form that they HAVE to be listed in that specific order? Kinda seems like it would go against the nature of the path itself, but I thought i'd ask.
blackspaven
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 am

Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!

Postby piotr » Mon Oct 03, 2011 4:42 pm

Kare wrote:I find it strange that no one has suggested this simple answer to the Pali-Magadhi problem. And if I am wrong, at least I would like to see it refuted.


Thanks for your insightful remarks. I think that your solution is plausible.
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...
User avatar
piotr
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:33 pm
Location: Khettadesa

Previous

Return to Pali

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests