Leafy wrote:Psychologists try to treat this by convincing you that bad things won't happen to you...
psychologists try to rebuild the wall of denial that makes you feel safe
Leafy wrote:...so how do you face and accept impermanence without ending up completely terrified? It's not death/non-existence that I'm afraid of... it's those other, worse-than-death things that can strike out-of-the-blue and leave someone suffering so much they wish they were dead... how do Buddhists handle being constantly aware that this could happen to any of us at any time, and yet *not* be constantly terrified?
Ben wrote:Leafy wrote:Psychologists try to treat this by convincing you that bad things won't happen to you...
psychologists try to rebuild the wall of denial that makes you feel safe
That is just wrong.
Ben wrote:With a deepening level of awareness one can also see previously overwhelming and compounded mental contents such as fear with a degree of equanimity that dissipates their sway.
Hi leafy.Leafy wrote:A few years ago, I saw something horrible and terrifying happen to a member of my family, and as a result became painfully aware that I am not and will never be safe, and that horrible things can happen to anybody at any time. Sort of an unpleasant, throw-you-into-the-deep-end crash course in impermanence...
Since then, I have been almost constantly consumed with fear of horrible things happening. Psychologists try to treat this by convincing you that bad things won't happen to you, which really doesn't help once you've seen first-hand that horrible things can happen to anyone. I have noticed that Buddhism seems to teach the opposite of what psychologists try to do -- psychologists try to rebuild the wall of denial that makes you feel safe, whereas Buddhists seem to work at tearing down the wall and fully accepting impermanence. Since years of therapy have done nothing to help me (I think that wall is too smashed to fix), I am ready to try the other approach. (My doctor knows and is OK with this).
...so how do you face and accept impermanence without ending up completely terrified? It's not death/non-existence that I'm afraid of... it's those other, worse-than-death things that can strike out-of-the-blue and leave someone suffering so much they wish they were dead... how do Buddhists handle being constantly aware that this could happen to any of us at any time, and yet *not* be constantly terrified?

Leafy wrote:...
how do Buddhists handle being constantly aware that this could happen to any of us at any time, and yet *not* be constantly terrified?
Leafy wrote:A few years ago, I saw something horrible and terrifying happen to a member of my family...

...how do Buddhists handle being constantly aware that this could happen to any of us at any time, and yet *not* be constantly terrified?
Upajjhatthana Sutta - AN 5.57 wrote:
"There are these five facts that one should reflect on often, whether one is a woman or a man, lay or ordained. Which five?
"'I am subject to aging, have not gone beyond aging.' This is the first fact that one should reflect on often, whether one is a woman or a man, lay or ordained.
"'I am subject to illness, have not gone beyond illness.' ...
"'I am subject to death, have not gone beyond death.' ...
"'I will grow different, separate from all that is dear and appealing to me.' ...
"'I am the owner of my actions, heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and have my actions as my arbitrator. Whatever I do, for good or for evil, to that will I fall heir.' ...
"These are the five facts that one should reflect on often, whether one is a woman or a man, lay or ordained.
"Now, based on what line of reasoning should one often reflect [on these five reflections]...
...
"Now, a disciple of the noble ones considers this: 'I am not the only one...
Nakulapita Sutta - SN 22.1 wrote:
"So it is, householder. So it is. The body is afflicted, weak, & encumbered. For who, looking after this body, would claim even a moment of true health, except through sheer foolishness? So you should train yourself: 'Even though I may be afflicted in body, my mind will be unafflicted.' That is how you should train yourself."
...
[Sariputta:] "But why didn't it occur to you to question the Blessed One further: 'In what way is one afflicted in body & afflicted in mind? And in what way is one afflicted in body but unafflicted in mind?'
[Nakulapita:]"I would come from a long way away to hear the explication of these words in Ven. Sariputta's presence. It would be good if Ven. Sariputta himself would enlighten me as to their meaning."
[S:] "Then in that case, householder, listen & pay close attention. I will speak..."
Sedaka Sutta - SN 47.19 wrote:
..."Monks, a frame of reference is to be practiced with the thought, 'I'll watch after myself.' A frame of reference is to be practiced with the thought, 'I'll watch after others.' When watching after oneself, one watches after others. When watching after others, one watches after oneself.
"And how does one, when watching after oneself, watch after others? Through pursuing [the practice], through developing it, through devoting oneself to it. This is how one, when watching after oneself, watches after others.
"And how does one, when watching after others, watch after oneself? Through endurance, through harmlessness, and through a mind of kindness & sympathy. This is how one, when watching after others, watches after oneself."
Return to Discovering Theravāda
Registered users: Alexa [Bot], Bakmoon, Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], cooran, Coyote, Crazy cloud, Google [Bot], Helyron, male_robin, mikenz66, Modus.Ponens, piotr, porpoise, purple planet, rahul3bds, retrofuturist