Dry vipassana?

Discussion of Satipatthana bhavanā and Vipassana bhavana.
danieLion
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am

Dry vipassana?

Postby danieLion » Mon Nov 28, 2011 7:53 am

What exactly is dry vipassana?
DanieLion :heart:

User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
Posts: 15179
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby retrofuturist » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:02 am

Greetings,

danieLion wrote:What exactly is dry vipassana?

Satipatthana without jhana.

Metta,
Retro. :)
“Delighting in existence O monks, are gods and men; they are attached to existence. they revel in existence. When the Dhamma for the cessation of existence is being preached to them, their minds do not leap towards it, do not get pleased with it, do not get settled in it, do not find confidence in it. That is how, monks, some lag behind … (It. p 43)”

Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum) -- Open flower ~ Open book (blog)

User avatar
Mr Man
Posts: 1521
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:42 am

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby Mr Man » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:14 am

Another unnecessary label.
:)

danieLion
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby danieLion » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:17 am

retrofuturist wrote:Greetings,

danieLion wrote:What exactly is dry vipassana?

Satipatthana without jhana.

Metta,
Retro. :)

Does it work? I mean, do those who do it claim it works? Are there practitioners here?

Is this covered in the jhana threads?
D :heart:

User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
Posts: 15179
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby retrofuturist » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:31 am

Greetings danieLion,

danieLion wrote:Does it work? I mean, do those who do it claim it works?

Well, you get a fair assurance from the Buddha at the end of the Satipatthana Sutta and there's nothing there that says that it is necessarily practiced under the influence of jhana.

danieLion wrote:Are there practitioners here?

Yes.

danieLion wrote:Is this covered in the jhana threads?

It's sort of covered in any topics that talk about the so-called "vipassana jhanas".

Metta,
Retro. :)
“Delighting in existence O monks, are gods and men; they are attached to existence. they revel in existence. When the Dhamma for the cessation of existence is being preached to them, their minds do not leap towards it, do not get pleased with it, do not get settled in it, do not find confidence in it. That is how, monks, some lag behind … (It. p 43)”

Dharma Wheel (Mahayana / Vajrayana forum) -- Open flower ~ Open book (blog)

User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
Posts: 16747
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: War.loun.dig.er.ler
Contact:

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby Ben » Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:08 am

Well, actually, dry vipassana usually refers to those people who develop vipassana in the complete absence of samatha. The (Abhidhammika) students of Sujin Boriharnwanaket may consider themselves suddha vipassana yanika (One who's vehicle is insight only), but I don't think they are the only ones.
The different strands of the Burmese Vipassana sub-traditions, to my knowledge, use both samatha and vipassana at different points.
Does it work? To be honest, I don't know Daniel. I do have great confidence in the efficacy of my own tradition and I think life's too short to jump ship.
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com..

User avatar
ground
Posts: 2592
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby ground » Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:06 pm

There has always first to be a learning which applies the knowledge of conventional words and terminology and which leads to understanding based on conventional words and terminology (initial conceptual learning). This holds true whether it is the practice of vipassana or the practice of samatha that one wants to learn and there is always analysis involved.
Then the learned has to be applied to experience (actual practice). This application again implies analysis.

To some extent concentration & calmness have to be the basis for both, the initial conceptual learning and the actual practice.

So I wonder what "dry" in the expression "dry vipassana" is referring to ... Maybe the expression is a fabrication caused by scholary/intellectual confusion?


Kind regards

JackV
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:19 am

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby JackV » Mon Nov 28, 2011 4:52 pm

Ben wrote: I do have great confidence in the efficacy of my own tradition and I think life's too short to jump ship.
kind regards,

Ben


Hi Ben.

Could I enquire as to what this tradition is?
Here where a thousand
captains swore grand conquest
Tall grasses their monument.

User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 2288
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby Bhikkhu Pesala » Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:07 pm

Is Jhāna Necessary? is an article about "Dry Insight."

Venerable Ledi Sayādaw also explains how to proceed directly to insight before attaining full absorption in his Manual of Respiration (Ānāpāna Dīpanī).

Venerable Henapola Gunaratana describes it in The Jhanas in Theravada Buddhist Meditation

Venerable Sayādaw U Pandita describes The Vipassanā Jhānas, the focusing of the mind on paramattha dhammas. Usually these are spoken of as “ultimate realities,” but actually they are just the things we can experience directly through the six sense doors without conceptualization.
AIM WebsitePāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)

User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
Posts: 16747
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: War.loun.dig.er.ler
Contact:

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby Ben » Mon Nov 28, 2011 7:04 pm

Hi Jack,
JackV wrote:
Ben wrote: I do have great confidence in the efficacy of my own tradition and I think life's too short to jump ship.
kind regards,

Ben


Hi Ben.

Could I enquire as to what this tradition is?


SN Goenka:
www.dhamma.org
www.vri.dhamma.org
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: ben.dhammawheel@gmail.com..

danieLion
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am

Re: Dry vipassana?

Postby danieLion » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:08 pm

Ben wrote:Well, actually, dry vipassana usually refers to those people who develop vipassana in the complete absence of samatha. The (Abhidhammika) students of Sujin Boriharnwanaket may consider themselves suddha vipassana yanika (One who's vehicle is insight only), but I don't think they are the only ones.
The different strands of the Burmese Vipassana sub-traditions, to my knowledge, use both samatha and vipassana at different points.
Does it work? To be honest, I don't know Daniel. I do have great confidence in the efficacy of my own tradition and I think life's too short to jump ship.
kind regards,

Ben

Interesting. The person who recently told me they do "dry vipassana" loves Abhidhamma--is ALL about Abhidhamma.


Return to “Insight Meditation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine